[-] shnizmuffin@lemmy.inbutts.lol 8 points 3 days ago

Towerfall is a massive hit at my annual holiday party. Specifically the Nintendo Switch version (with 6-player maps).

[-] shnizmuffin@lemmy.inbutts.lol 5 points 3 days ago

Crisis Point 3: Resurgence Factor

[-] shnizmuffin@lemmy.inbutts.lol 10 points 5 days ago

"We're doing Sega Channel again, but it'll work this time, goddamnit!"

- SEGA Execs., probably

132

lol, lmao.

[-] shnizmuffin@lemmy.inbutts.lol 75 points 6 months ago

We will continue to use Bugzilla, moz-phab, Phabricator, and Lando.

Although we'll be hosting the repository on GitHub, our contribution workflow will remain unchanged and we will not be accepting Pull Requests at this time.

The cool thing about distributed version control is that it's distributed. It sounds like GitHub will just be a public remote, rather than the place where active development happens.

[-] shnizmuffin@lemmy.inbutts.lol 90 points 7 months ago

I mean, turning on Penis sounds pretty low-effort to me.

[-] shnizmuffin@lemmy.inbutts.lol 109 points 10 months ago

Ingress and egress costs are real and those assholes attached images to their spam. Hundreds of posts coming in at 700kb a pop does damage if you're relying on a cloud provider to store your shit. Then, it gets accessed by all your users.

Billing alarms go bing bing bing.

[-] shnizmuffin@lemmy.inbutts.lol 67 points 10 months ago

Preface: I appreciate the sentiment, fuck Microsoft.

  1. Projects typically aren't "hosted" on code repositories like GitHub.
  2. Because the underlying version control technology, git, is meant to be distributed - it's super weird to draw that line in the sand. It's like saying "show me TXT files written with SublimeText, I hate Notepad++!"
  3. I get that you might want to, like, judge a developer for using github? But, like... features are features. Build minutes are build minutes. If you fork a repo and use GitLab to manage it, does that make the project better?
[-] shnizmuffin@lemmy.inbutts.lol 61 points 11 months ago

totally ignoring matters such as their usage stats

The author asked multiple devs about these things - they all had the same reply: Can't talk about it because NDA.

more importantly the content itself that is now flat-out missing from Reddit. Go to any old thread and you’ll see the “this content has been removed by” (whichever of the automated software to remove posts was used in that case) messages.

That's not the stated objective of the article, which was "Exploring Reddit’s third-party app environment."

Honestly it reads like a shill to promote Reddit as in “hey, all that fuss was for nothing - you should totally come back now”.

No, it doesn't. You don't call it an "APIcalypse" if you're shilling for Reddit. You don't pull out the most critical quote right at the top if you want to shill for Reddit. ("I don’t believe Reddit’s leadership... cares about developers anymore.") You don't mention Lemmy, or Threads, or Tildes if you're shilling for Reddit.

You admit that you're biased; good, thank you. This article isn't.

[-] shnizmuffin@lemmy.inbutts.lol 70 points 1 year ago

They understand that git is a Distributed Version Control System, right?

view more: next ›

shnizmuffin

joined 2 years ago