[-] tanja@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 4 days ago

Wake up babe, new bottom surgery just dropped

[-] tanja@lemmy.blahaj.zone 34 points 3 months ago

Both.

Both is good.

[-] tanja@lemmy.blahaj.zone 81 points 4 months ago

There are GPU-locked apps?

Wtf

[-] tanja@lemmy.blahaj.zone 153 points 6 months ago

Nice

Good to see one of the two big packaging hubs do something against malware

11
submitted 6 months ago by tanja@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml
30

Hey there 👋

I'm looking for filament recommendations (preferably PLA) which glows in the dark, specifically, the ones which glow the brightest/the longest.

I.e. the GITD filament with the most particles (I think)?

Any recommendations?

[-] tanja@lemmy.blahaj.zone 46 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Ain't no one getting excited about any kind of capitalism any more 🤮🤢

[-] tanja@lemmy.blahaj.zone 55 points 7 months ago

Trans Jesus is canon ✨🏳️‍⚧️

[-] tanja@lemmy.blahaj.zone 24 points 8 months ago

Benutzername prüft aus

[-] tanja@lemmy.blahaj.zone 38 points 8 months ago

It simply makes no sense that it only blocks Chinese citizens specifically.

I don't want anyone to buy/own housing which goes uninhabited for a long time while there are so many homeless people who need a place to call home.

It's difficult to imagine a person struggling to buy/rent an apartment/house, and for them to get mad about nationalities, rather than the fact that housing needs to be an "investment opportunity" over being recognized as the basic human need that it really is.

I hardly care if it's Chinese people, Wallstreet, some Big Tech corporation, or just individual landlords driving up prices.

Housing must be accessible to all people, if a society wants to call itself civilized.

This bill going against Chinese citizens, rather than all foreigners tells you all you need to know about the real motivations behind it.

[-] tanja@lemmy.blahaj.zone 31 points 9 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Just because these people can't vote yet doesn't mean they shouldn't have rights or be treated with dignity and respect like the rest of society.

I'm disappointed with people arguing that literally banning smartphones would somehow improve the social situation for anyone.

Just because you cannot see bullying or collect statistics about it quite as easily, does not mean it disappears. I'd argue the opposite: blocking others online is trivial compared to doing the same in-person.

We also have to acknowledge that some children simply are more introverted, and will want to stay more secluded than others. Forcing them to behave in other ways seems counterproductive.

Just because some parents (understandably) struggle with raising their kids shouldn't mean that they're all doomed to what amounts to nationwide collective punishment.

I for one support children's rights, at least on this one point.

Edit:
Exact circumstances can, and will very, as every child is unique. Therefore, we should allow for case by case decisions. Luckily, the de facto situation already has the parents deciding, which makes sense in most cases IMO.

And taking away the phones of other people won't stop online bullying either (e.g. spreading rumors without the victim's knowledge).

[-] tanja@lemmy.blahaj.zone 49 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Based

Genau so, und nicht anders

Über Menschenrechte und Inklusion ist nicht zu debattieren. 🏳️‍🌈✨

[-] tanja@lemmy.blahaj.zone 61 points 10 months ago

Honestly, as long as you're not going for a clickbait-like thing with lots of 😂, 😭, and 💀, when is not really justified, I don't really see an issue.

Personally I'll use ✨, ☺️, 🌸, and 🥺 regularly in my comments as I think they're cute 🥺✨

[-] tanja@lemmy.blahaj.zone 95 points 10 months ago

Rather disappointing.

I'd be in favor of a law requiring the labeling of such products, but this seems to overreach; especially when applied to animal feed.

86
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by tanja@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/linux@lemmy.ml

So I've recently taken an interest in these three distros:

All of these offer something very interesting:
Access to (basically) all Linux-capable software, no matter from what repo.

Both NixOS and blendOS are based on config files, from which your system is basically derived from, and Vanilla OS uses a package manager apx to install from any given repo, regardless of distribution.

While I've looked into Fedora Silverblue, that distro is limited to only install Flatpaks (edit: no, not really), which is fine for "apps", but seems to be more of a problem with managing system- and CLI tools.

I haven't distro hopped yet, as I'm still on Manjaro GNOME on my devices.


What are your thoughts on the three distros mentioned above?
Which ones are the most interesting, and for what reasons?

Personally, I'm mostly interested in NixOS & blendOS, as I believe they may have more advantages compared to Arch;

What do you think?

view more: next ›

tanja

joined 1 year ago