[-] tmRgwnM9b87eJUPq@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

You will not have that problem with Tesla though. All chargers are 150kW+.

[-] tmRgwnM9b87eJUPq@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

Just to add: they should not be chained, but they should run in parallel.

[-] tmRgwnM9b87eJUPq@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

The car indeed has mobile data. A Tesla has a permanent 4g connection.

[-] tmRgwnM9b87eJUPq@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Hmm you’re right about autopilot mainly being used on highways and those roads are a lot safer. I’ll edit my main comment

[-] tmRgwnM9b87eJUPq@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

You’re totally right.

There is a manual door handle, which is not supposed to be used.

Most guests in my car naturally tend to go for the manual handle instead of the button, when not instructed.

So the people who claim to be locked are either looking for money or are total dumbfucks.

[-] tmRgwnM9b87eJUPq@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

You’re right about that. The software is quite epic, compared to other EV manufacturers, like BMW.

The route planning for 1000+ km road trips is almost perfect.

[-] tmRgwnM9b87eJUPq@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The system works with AI signaling phone usage by driving.

Then a human will verify the photo.

AI is used to respect people’s privacy.

The combination of the AI detection+human review leads to a 5% false negative rate, and most probably 0% false positive.

This means that the AI missed at most 5% positives, but probably less because of the human reviewer not being 100% sure there was an offense.

[-] tmRgwnM9b87eJUPq@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Just to clarify the result: the article states that AI and human review leads to 95%.

Could also be that the human is flagging actual positives, found by the AI, as false positives.

[-] tmRgwnM9b87eJUPq@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago

The system we use in NL is called “monocam”. A few years ago it caught 95% of all offenders.

This means that AI had at most 5% false negatives.

I wonder if they have improved the system in the mean time.

https://nos.nl/artikel/2481555-nieuwe-slimme-camera-s-aangeschaft-om-appende-bestuurders-te-betrappen

[-] tmRgwnM9b87eJUPq@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

We have a couple of these cameras in The Netherlands.

We found it quite intrusive to look into people’s cars. Therefore the computer will flag photos, of possible offenses, and a person verifies them.

Unfortunately the movable camera has a huge lens and it’s reported to a waze-like app before they are even finished setting it up.

[-] tmRgwnM9b87eJUPq@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Although the manufacturing process might simplify, negative impact on our planet will most definitely increase.

[-] tmRgwnM9b87eJUPq@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

The main reason is to be on the users Home Screen, just one tap away from being on the app. Also, push notifications, pulling people back into the app.

Also there is a security benefit. Phones are protected quite well, so it is safer to keep a user signed on the device and maybe only a PIN or biometrics in front of the app to open it. The apps run in an isolated space, making it even safer.

Lastly there can be a performance benefit. Websites are written in HTML, CSS and JavaScript which is compiled on demand, while apps can be written in languages which are pre-compiled.

view more: next ›

tmRgwnM9b87eJUPq

joined 1 year ago