[-] verstra@programming.dev 23 points 2 weeks ago

Can someone explain why this is bad? It seems like normal behaviour of corporations.

Or has spotify previously committed to being a fair market?

[-] verstra@programming.dev 19 points 1 month ago

What's this building? I suspect this might be a crime against architecture as a field.

[-] verstra@programming.dev 20 points 2 months ago

I agree, this is an anti-pattern for me.

Having explicit throw keywords is much more readable compared to hiding flow-control into helper functions.

[-] verstra@programming.dev 20 points 4 months ago

They've lost potential revenue, but that is not the same as if amazon would come to their house and had stolen their only rucksack prototype.

Potential revenue is not your property.

It still sucks though.

[-] verstra@programming.dev 25 points 8 months ago

A we the baddies?

[-] verstra@programming.dev 23 points 8 months ago

Im interested to see lemmyui on this list.

[-] verstra@programming.dev 18 points 10 months ago

Ah yes, the enshitification

[-] verstra@programming.dev 16 points 10 months ago

why do you provide a link to creative commons license? Ive seen such links few times on lemmy.

[-] verstra@programming.dev 22 points 1 year ago
[-] verstra@programming.dev 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Barges into a lemmy thread

Gives a strong, but quite abstract opinion criticizing abstractions

Refuses to elaborate further

view more: ‹ prev next ›

verstra

joined 2 years ago