There was a time I would have asked if this was written by an AI, but I'm used to getting much more coherent output from AI nowadays. Who the F wrote this crap? It barely counts as English.
Probably? Now?
That's pretty much how everything on the Internet works, FYI. Lemmy is just upfront about it
A lot of them were lawyers.
I'm not seeing the downside here
You're not wrong, but realistically, there's no chance of it happening.
Yes, we should have gone with the alternative of letting millions of people die of thirst.
/s, because otherwise somebody will somehow think I meant this literally
Pretty biased take. The guy WAS toxic, I had dealt with him before. He'd just jump on any comment concerning sync to get on his soapbox, regardless of whether it was relevant. The community's better off without that nonsense.
Not quite missing, but she said she had received strike 2 of 3, and the 3rd one is really bad. So she's going quiet to avoid any potential stuff from happening.
https://www.hackingbutlegal.com/p/naomi-wu-and-the-silence-that-speaks-volumes
You see stupid, I see intentional irony
Depends which country you're talking about
Why? The author explains what longtermism is, at least their perspective of it, but then makes the jump to 'in conclusion, it's bad for humanity' without ever quite touching on WHY it's bad (having a few key followers with questionable ethics is insufficient, you can do that about ANY major belief)
wahming
joined 1 year ago
For sale: Baby shoes, still worn