[-] xcutie@linux.community 9 points 1 month ago

Dicky McDickface

[-] xcutie@linux.community 3 points 4 months ago

Frag mal deine Großeltern. In deren Jugend hat ein Döner nur 2 Reichsmark gekostet.

[-] xcutie@linux.community 14 points 4 months ago

Sure they could, but why would they?

[-] xcutie@linux.community 1 points 5 months ago

Hollies - Long dark road?

[-] xcutie@linux.community 26 points 5 months ago

Is this "Don't be evil!"?

[-] xcutie@linux.community 8 points 7 months ago

Would it not just be the easiest way to put your scripts under /etc/network/if-up.d/? Then they get run once that connection is brought up.

[-] xcutie@linux.community 1 points 11 months ago

I guess lately no press is good enough press for them.

[-] xcutie@linux.community 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Joe - just for quick edits on a text file

[-] xcutie@linux.community 1 points 1 year ago

I just debuged it like every other of my scripts that failed. Again, I didn't need any special knowledge of the init process, just general (and for me: very limited) knowledge.

The answer to your other questions: I don't thing I ever did that.

[-] xcutie@linux.community 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I find everything so complicated with systemd.

SysV was just intuitive for me and my knowledge. There was just one directory with all the startup scripts in it. And they were run in their alphanumerical ordner. Just that simple. If I wanted to change the order in which the scripts started, I just had to rename the file. You don't want a script to run at all? Just remove it.

I assume, systemd has many advantages for a knowledged user. But for me, it still is just a hassle.

[-] xcutie@linux.community 2 points 1 year ago

IceWM. Just the bare minimum I need. But nothing more.

view more: next ›

xcutie

joined 1 year ago