694
Accidentally ruthless (startrek.website)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] tuhriel@discuss.tchncs.de -1 points 1 year ago

And what do you do if you want to reference how fast the field moves, or why certain methods are not done anymore, but where found 'good enough' back in the days. You would still have to use the old source and cite them...

An absolute cut off doesn't teach you anything...a guidance, how to identify good sources from bad or outdated ones would be much better

[-] can@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

I don't imagine a paper of that scope would have such a restriction.

this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2023
694 points (97.8% liked)

People Twitter

5454 readers
972 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS