1249
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by girlfreddy@lemmy.ca to c/news@lemmy.world

In an interview with the Guardian from his home base in Burlington, Vermont, Sanders urged the Democratic president to inject more urgency into his bid for re-election. He said that unless the president was more direct in recognising the many crises faced by working-class families his Republican rival would win.

“We’ve got to see the White House move more aggressively on healthcare, on housing, on tax reform, on the high cost of prescription drugs,” Sanders said. “If we can get the president to move in that direction, he will win; if not, he’s going to lose.”

The US senator from Vermont added that he was in contact with the White House pressing that point. “We hope to make clear to the president and his team that they are not going to win this election unless they come up with a progressive agenda that speaks to the needs of the working class of this country.”

Sanders’ warning comes at a critical time in American politics. On Monday, Republicans in Iowa will gather for caucuses that mark the official start of the 2024 presidential election.

Biden faces no serious challenger in the Democratic primaries. But concern is mounting over how he would fare against Trump given a likely rematch between them in November.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] hglman@lemmy.ml 53 points 11 months ago

So odd how dems always fumble it away.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 46 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Eh, Obama went hard on election stuff and so did Bill. This hubris seems recent and tied to a belief that Trump isn't a serious candidate.

[-] Blackmist@lemmy.world 25 points 11 months ago

Did the same thing with Dubya.

"That other guy is terrible" is a really bad way to go into an election.

Neither side knows how to fix things, but one of them lies and says it does. Being the incumbent doesn't help either, because if you do say you know how to fix things the obvious reply is "well why haven't you done it then?"

[-] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Neither side knows how to fix things, but one of them lies and says it does.

I would argue both sides know how to fix things but neither one is willing to do ALL the work required ... especially when it comes to re-regulating Wall St, taxing the rich across the board (like they were post-WW2), and clamping down on the billions of dollars donated through super PACs that essentially buys elections.

[-] shiroininja@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

It's not like hes won before, right? /s

[-] echoct@lemmynsfw.com 18 points 11 months ago

It's almost like it's on purpose... Like the offense and defense of the capital class...

[-] normalexit@lemmy.world 17 points 11 months ago

Surely the people that own everything wouldn't use the government to get what they want.

[-] ICastFist@programming.dev 3 points 11 months ago

Of course not! It's the best democracy in the world, anyone can buy it!

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

What, regulatory capture is real? Surely voting harder will fix that.

[-] rusticus@lemm.ee 16 points 11 months ago

That's because the corporatists that control the messaging want some periodic austerity to keep the working class in line. "You should be happy with what we give you" or something like that.

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago
this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2024
1249 points (98.1% liked)

News

23669 readers
3569 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS