130
submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by Ragdoll_X@lemmy.world to c/dataisbeautiful@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] bjorney@lemmy.ca 0 points 8 months ago

I mean I'm speaking from first hand experience in academia. Like I mentioned, this obviously isn't the case for people running prohibitively costly experiments, but is absolutely the case for teams where acquiring more data just means throwing a few more weeks of time at the lab, the grunt work is being done by the students usually anyways. There are a lot more labs in existence that consist of just a PI and 5-10 grad students/post-docs than there are mega labs working cern.

There were a handful of times I remember rerunning an experiment that was on the cusp, either to solidify a result or to rule out a significant finding that I correctly suspected was just luck - what is another 3 weeks of data collection when you are spending up to a year designing/planning/iterating/writing to get the publication?

this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2024
130 points (100.0% liked)

Data Is Beautiful

6733 readers
1119 users here now

A place to share and discuss data visualizations. #dataviz


(under new moderation as of 2024-01, please let me know if there are any changes you want to see!)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS