186
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/world@lemmy.world

Mr. Ernst and Mr. Krutikhin noted that, unlike in other oil infrastructure such as pipelines, a lot of complex machinery and sophisticated engineering goes into refineries, and they can take several months to fix. Some analysts say the repairs could take longer than usual because sanctions prohibit Western sales of certain components to Russia.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Altofaltception@lemmy.world -3 points 9 months ago

Please explain how burning a refinery reduces burning?

[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 2 points 9 months ago

Prevent crude oil from being refined, and it's not useful, so people don't burn it. The quantities passed through the refinery are far greater than the amount present at it on any given day, so one less refinery means a whole lot less consumption.

[-] Altofaltception@lemmy.world -2 points 9 months ago

Oh so what you're saying is that the US burning Iraqi oil fields in the Gulf war(s) was for environmental reasons.

That's really progressive.

[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 2 points 9 months ago

Burning an oil well directly burns oil which people would otherwise burned, while raising prices and encouraging additional extraction. I'll also note that Saddam Hussein had people light the oil wells on fire before the US moved in.

An attack on a refinery prevents oil from being burned, and can't burn oil that's not there. I'd prefer to see them shut down in a planned matter, but this is better than keeping them going.

Different things are different. Deal with it.

[-] Altofaltception@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Burning oil to prevent people from burning fossil fuels is certainly a take.

Carbon is carbon. Burning crude oil puts carbon in the air just like burning petroleum does. The difference is now you've driven energy costs up while wasting the resource.

Edited to add: so if Saddam burning oil fields in Kuwait was bad, are we also going to admit that Ukraine burning oil refineries in Russia is also bad? Or is it only bad when our enemies do it?

[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 1 points 9 months ago

An attack on the midstream is fundamentally different from burning oil at the well in terms of how it affects how much carbon goes into the atmosphere; it results in oil not being extracted and burned.

this post was submitted on 15 Mar 2024
186 points (97.4% liked)

World News

39402 readers
2302 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS