40
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by hanrahan@slrpnk.net to c/collapse@lemmy.ml

Homo sapiens has evolved to reproduce exponentially, expand geographically, and consume all available resources. For most of humanity’s evolutionary history, such expansionist tendencies have been countered by negative feedback. However, the scientific revolution and the use of fossil fuels reduced many forms of negative feedback, enabling us to realize our full potential for exponential growth. This natural capacity is being reinforced by growth-oriented neoliberal economics

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

The obvious is simple and has been there the entire time:

Wolves. We need to genetically engineer fast breeding, hyper intelligent, rapidly growing wolves to curtail the human population.

There is no possible way this could go wrong and I'll take no notes.

[-] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 3 points 5 months ago

No need, we'll do it ourselves

https://theintercept.com/2023/10/29/william-nordhaus-climate-economics/

Terrible numbers get thrown around. But scientists mean what they say. Kevin Anderson, professor of energy and climate change at the University of Manchester in the U.K. and Uppsala University in Sweden, asserts that “something like 10 percent of the planet’s population — around half a billion people — will survive if global temperatures rise by 4 C.” He notes, with a modicum of hopefulness, that we “will not make all human beings extinct as a few people with the right sort of resources may put themselves in the right parts of the world and survive. But I think it’s extremely unlikely that we wouldn’t have mass death at 4 C.”

Johan Rockström, director of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research in Germany and a leading researcher on climate tipping points and “safe boundaries” for humanity, projects that in a 4 C warmer world, “it’s difficult to see how we could accommodate a billion people or even half of that.”

Hans Shellenhuber suggests that if we get to around 2c or thereabouts, 4c is inevitable becase of cascading tipping points we won't be able to stop.

[-] maketotaldestr0i@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago

plagues fit the role better

this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2024
40 points (97.6% liked)

Collapse

3237 readers
2 users here now

We have moved to https://lemm.ee/c/collapse -- please adjust your subscriptions

This is the place for discussing the potential collapse of modern civilization and the environment.


Collapse, in this context, refers to the significant loss of an established level or complexity towards a much simpler state. It can occur differently within many areas, orderly or chaotically, and be willing or unwilling. It does not necessarily imply human extinction or a singular, global event. Although, the longer the duration, the more it resembles a ‘decline’ instead of collapse.


RULES

1 - Remember the human

2 - Link posts should come from a reputable source

3 - All opinions are allowed but discussion must be in good faith.

4 - No low effort posts.


Related lemmys:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS