1138
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] vox@sopuli.xyz 0 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

i have no idea what this brand is supposed to be but... tbh i don't see anything wrong with the right one
logos are supposed to be simple-ish, use minimal amount of colors and be scalable and it sure does a better job with it's reduced color palette and vector shapes
the one on the left should be reserved for e.g. illustrations

[-] phorq@lemmy.ml 4 points 8 months ago

I kinda agree with it from an ease of printing perspective and easy perception from a distance, but they completely changed the proportions and got rid of the contrasting dark blue/red color-scheme that would catch people's eyes. Looking at them side by side I'm still not convinced they're even the same company, and that's a failure for brand recognition in my mind which is the only reason logos even exist.

this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2024
1138 points (97.6% liked)

People Twitter

5447 readers
1737 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS