843
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] gmtom@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago

I mean, he /could/ be right. He probably isn't but he could be.

Nano technology doesn't refer exclusively to like nano robots it could also just be infused with nano particles of something.

[-] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 7 points 7 months ago

Well, there's a lot of particles that are "nano" in size. And "nano" isn't a size; nano is a unit prefix.

Even the earth is smaller than 1 nano parsec. So the meaning is irrelevant when earth is a nano "particle" (on the parsec scale).

Meaningless jibber jabber.

[-] gmtom@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

And “nano” isn’t a size; nano is a unit prefix.

Even the earth is smaller than 1 nano parsec.

Thank you for the pointless pedantry

[-] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 months ago

Pointless pedantry is a specialty of mine. I'm happy to be appreciated.

[-] NoFood4u@sopuli.xyz 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Pedantic. When people say micro-scale/nano-scale they mean "measured in micrometers/nanometers". So a nanoparticle is a particle with a size that makes nanometers the most convenient unit.

this post was submitted on 20 May 2024
843 points (98.3% liked)

People Twitter

5407 readers
420 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS