469
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by mozz@mbin.grits.dev to c/dataisbeautiful@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] MacStache@programming.dev 30 points 2 months ago

I've never understood why there is a voting system where the one with most votes can lose.

[-] meeeeetch@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago

They usually justify it by saying it's to prevent the tyranny of the majority (two wolves and a sheep biting on dinner).

But a case could be made that it's a way to keep the elite entrenched.

[-] MacStache@programming.dev 4 points 2 months ago

Kinda makes sense. Would make more if the number of terms were the limiting factor. Two and you're out for life. Sement that, no alleviating factors.

Who knows, maybe they even have that in place already.

[-] Triasha@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

That rule was added in the 1950's.

[-] Triasha@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

The founders were a gentleman's club. Which is basically a fraternity. They made up rules that made sense to a bunch of frat boy farmers with enlightenment libraries.

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

I wouldn’t call them farmers. Partly because a variety of wealthy professions were represented and mostly because the ones who called themselves farmers didn’t do any farming, they forced enslaved people to farm for them.

[-] Triasha@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago
[-] CableMonster@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 months ago

It was a compromise so the smaller states were willing to join the United States. Same reason there are two senators for each state.

this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2024
469 points (96.1% liked)

Data Is Beautiful

6778 readers
30 users here now

A place to share and discuss data visualizations. #dataviz


(under new moderation as of 2024-01, please let me know if there are any changes you want to see!)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS