235
Are there any "famous" Lemmy users?
(lemmy.world)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2024
235 points (91.5% liked)
Ask Lemmy
27277 readers
1430 users here now
A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions
Rules: (interactive)
1) Be nice and; have fun
Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them
2) All posts must end with a '?'
This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?
3) No spam
Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.
4) NSFW is okay, within reason
Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com.
NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].
5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions.
If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.
6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online
Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.
Partnered Communities:
Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
You were banned from World News because of transphobic bigotry, as you know.
No. You asked a deliberatly transphobic question, to define a REAL women (implying some women are not real). Then banned me because I refused to fall for your trick.
It is impossible to objectively mod your own arguments. You are Judge Judy and executioner.
This would be a lot more believable if you didn't make a post earlier today suggesting Biden is a pedophile and didn't have a bunch of deleted antivaxxer posts in the modlogs (and one suggesting the live broadcast of the moon landing was fake).
Whoops.
I thought the charge was being transphobic?
All the other examples listed are highlight faulty logic, not expressing an opinion.
Saying A does not imply B.
In our particular case, saying a governing body should clarifying it's classification rules to avoid future incidents does not imply hate towards any particular person or group of people.
Sorry, not going to argue with you about this right-wing shit again. Go find someone else to be bigoted around.
You are being overly antagonistic and seem unreasonably attached to labeling me as right wing.
You post too often and inaccurately for conversations like this not to occur again. I've already corrected your posts twice today and further interactions could be mistaken for a grudge.
I don't like blocking people because I'm here to hear a variety of opinions, but it's probably better for everyone if I do so.
As a parting thought, I'll leave you with the definition of a bigot and let you reflect.
Yep. Sounds like you.
I definitely let the moderator power go to my head by banning people for being bigots in the communities I moderate what with that being against the rules in those communities.
I mean really, the temerity- the gall of me enforcing rules just because I'm a moderator.
You seem to be the one who is keeping this argument going since you were the one who replied to me.
oh boy, here we go again. please continue proving my point.
You mean like continuing an argument for no reason?
And yet you're doing the very thing you accused me of doing. So I guess we're two peas in a pod.
Cool. Let me know when I'll be healthy enough to get one.