1028
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] allo@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

"You do not mention the path of the electron at all, Heisenberg. But yet when you look in a cloud chamber the electron's track can be observed quite directly." "Don't you think that it's strange to say that there is a path for the electron in the cloud chamber, but there is no path for the electron in the atom?" ~Einstein

Yeah weird it would then be pure probability with no causes when it's inside the atom because that's what matches the mathematical framework of Quantum Physics while when it's in a cloud chamber ITS EXACT LOCATION AS A DISTINCT OBJECT IS CLEARLY VISIBLE. So yeah I'm with reality instead of that mathematical framework and don't see any issue with the same concept of 'having a form' applying to entanglement ~which 100% blows up Bell's theorem before it gets to multilocation.

Bell's Theorem ---> ๐Ÿ’ฅ

Possibility of Hidden Variables ---> ๐Ÿ‘

this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2024
1028 points (93.8% liked)

People Twitter

5080 readers
1905 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying.
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS