614
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] bloodfart@lemmy.ml -1 points 5 hours ago

No.

I haven’t held my nose for a democrat for going on fourteen years and I’m not going to start now.

I’m politically active far beyond voting and have spoken face to face with several representatives. They don’t care or listen.

No amount of voting reform will fix the fundamentally unjust American political system.

I have been doing the work and will continue to do so. Voting for PSL in this election is part of that work.

If you’re reading this, don’t fall for the “oh if only we had star or ranked choice” fiddlefarting around the edges garbage. We live in under a fundamentally unjust political system and especially when both major parties are advocating in support of genocide there is no reasonable argument for performing the calculus required to declare one the lesser evil.

Walk away from omelas.

[-] YeetPics@mander.xyz 2 points 2 hours ago

[Nobody cares]

[Jill Stein is a vapid, forgettable cunt with 0 plans for governance or policy change]

[You supporting her only makes you look like the same type of human-garbage]

Hope this helps 🫶

[-] bloodfart@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 hours ago

I’m literally suggesting people vote for a party and candidate different than stein.

Did you reply to the correct comment?

[-] AllHailTheSheep@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 hours ago

it must be really nice to be privileged enough to have this viewpoint. and all for what? so you can give yourself a nice ethical pat on the back when you help siphon from the dems, and the gop comes after women and minorities? not sure what your background is but damn dude that's some fucked up shit

[-] CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works 8 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Ok I've heard all kinds of different reasons someone might be privileged, but doing work on the ground for years and laying the groundwork for real activism rather than whatever the hell you call this terminally online bullshit, is now what you people call privilege?

This shit is why Occupy died.

[-] AllHailTheSheep@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 hours ago

ground activism is great! but this person's comment pretty much sums up to "whichever if the two candidates win in November, I won't be effected enough to consider not tossing my vote into the trash to prove a point," as do all 3rd party arguments. that's privileged.

many many people quite literally have their lives on the line with this election, it's extremely disrespectful to put them all in danger for some self centered, ill-thought out attempt at morality.

[-] aesthelete@lemmy.world -1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Occupy died because of "terminally online bullshit"? I guess that terminally online bullshit is either more effective than what you're suggesting or your analysis sucks.

[-] CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 hour ago

One whole paragraph followed by a comment like that implies someone is usually talking about the whole episode going on and not just the keywords you singled out.

[-] chaogomu@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago

Maybe they just like the GOP but don't want to admit that they like them.

They also completely disregard the fact that the Voting System itself causes the very problems they have with the political system.

First Past the Post is 100% the reason why we vote against a party, rather than for a candidate.

That combined with the Permanent Apportionment Act of 1929 have caused all sorts of problems. That too is something to advocate against. But one thing at a time.

[-] bloodfart@lemmy.ml -2 points 4 hours ago

What background do I need to have in order to be allowed to recognize that the mathematics of lesser evils don’t make any sense?

Is there some amount of subjugation I can be under that allows me to have a materialist analysis?

Literally me: Don’t encourage these scumbags, don’t wait another moment to stand up for what you know is right, voting is the easiest way to make your voice heard!

You: wow, must be nice!

If youre reading this, don’t listen to people who try to mobilize identity politics against you. They don’t know or care who you are and would hate you more if you were a minority speaking out.

[-] chaogomu@lemmy.world 3 points 57 minutes ago

What background do I need to have in order to be allowed to recognize that the mathematics of lesser evils don’t make any sense?

A mathematically illiterate one.

See, we live under a system of First Past the Post, otherwise known as Plurality.

It's a system that forces a two party system. Not as a conscious choice, but as a consequence of the very system itself.

Here's the kicker. Plurality voting actively punishes you for supporting a third party.

If you siphon votes away from the lesser of two evils, the greater evil wins.

It's a pretty simple concept. And since we are just weeks away from the election, anyone who is actively pushing for third parties is automatically suspect.

Because the problems with Plurality are not some newly discovered quirk. They've been studied for centuries, but most extensively by Kenneth Arrow in the 70s.

What I'm saying is that most of the money given to support Third Parties, comes from people who are on the opposite side of the spectrum from those Third Parties.

Simply put, Trump and company throw money at the Greens and Socialists to siphon support away from the Dems, so that Trump and company can win with fewer votes.

So you, advocating for a third party, are mathematically indistinguishable from a Trump supporter.

[-] bloodfart@lemmy.ml -1 points 44 minutes ago

Wow if third parties are so powerful then how come you’re not voting for one too?

It seems like a great way to force the major party of your choice to pay attention to your politics.

[-] chaogomu@lemmy.world 3 points 41 minutes ago

I'm not voting Third party because I'm not a Trump Supporter.

But you may be one. Mathematically speaking.

[-] bloodfart@lemmy.ml 2 points 29 minutes ago

My vote isn’t going to be counted for trump, and is for a party in opposition to his program.

You have a funny way of figuring out if someone is a trump supporter. Is it perhaps based on the old “with us or against us” chestnut?

You should know before you keep pushing that line, I will not vote Harris. If there was no party for socialism and liberation, I’d vote a different third party. If there were no third parties, I’d write a candidate in.

If you want to pick up a Harris vote, look elsewhere.

[-] chaogomu@lemmy.world 1 points 24 minutes ago

But you're publicly advocating for others to drop their support of Harris in favor of a third party.

Which is mathematically identical to telling people to vote for Trump. So I name thee a Trump supporter, because that's the only person who benefits from your actions.

[-] bloodfart@lemmy.ml 1 points 14 minutes ago

Where?

My top level reply is an attempt to get Green Party voters who are starting to not feel so good to switch over to psl.

Also it’s not mathematically identical because my third party vote isn’t counted for trump.

I’m kinda surprised you care. Your party has written us off, do you not agree with their decision?

this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2024
614 points (96.1% liked)

politics

19047 readers
4000 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS