544
submitted 2 weeks ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 75 points 2 weeks ago

And yet this country chose to elect a president who has in no uncertain terms said he will dissolve Obamacare which will only give more money and power to the CEOs of shitty healthcare companies.

[-] Jomega@lemmy.world 50 points 2 weeks ago

To be fair, people tried to shoot him too.

[-] GhiLA@sh.itjust.works 20 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)
[-] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago

But the reason many voted for him, or simply didn't vote at all was because the traditional poloticians weren't helping either. Kind of a "banging my head against this wall hasn't worked, let try this other wall."

[-] frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

More like "I didn't bother educating myself on these two walls but when I was growing up in the 80s 'R' next to a name meant financial security to my daddy, so now that the economy isn't great I need to vote R."

[-] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

I am sure there were plenty of those, but they always do that. So nothing new there. And I don't blame them honestly. When both choices suck, why invest a ton of time and energy into researching. The way businesses pass work onto us these days means everyone is short of time and energy.

[-] klemptor@startrek.website 1 points 2 weeks ago

Ding ding ding!

[-] CitizenKong@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

More like "let's blow myself up together with the wall, that'll show it!"

[-] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, nothing like trying to reign in the oligarchs who are over pricing everything by installing a bunch of oligarchs as your defacto government. That'll surely fix the problem.

[-] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

I don't think the people who crossed over or stayed home expect trump to fix anything. That just wanted to send a message that they were not okay with what the dems were doing. And they didn't have many options.

[-] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

You are assigning far too much thought to how people voted this go around. I think it's more basic than that. I think it's just straight up apathy. Along with a good bit of confusion that was juiced by one of the richest men on the planet. Who just so happens to own one of the largest social media platforms that has ever existed.

Conspiracy theorists fall into the hole of trying to boil down complicated problems to just one singular factor. But it's not. It's very very complicated and there's a lot of things that need to be done to fix it. My personal hope is that one of those will be that this absolute win by the Republican party and Trump in particular will be the the ax that takes down the Democratic party and allows us to build a new one in its place. But that's kind of a pipe dream I think. Old dogs die hard. Plus there's nobody out there who wants to step up and push the Democratic party out of the way. Bernie would be the obvious choice but he doesn't seem interested in taking leadership role in a brand new party to oust the old one.

Bernie is too old. His time has passed. Some point to AOC. But I'm not feeling it really. Who knows though. Trump sort of came out of nowhere and took over the republican party.

[-] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 weeks ago

Obamacare is a pretty huge handout to insurance companies anyway.

[-] superglue@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 2 weeks ago

I am too young to have experienced what it was like Pre Obamacare. But as I understand it, insurance companies used to be able to drop you if you cost too much. What is the point of their existence then? What is the point of buying insurance if they can just drop you if you cost too much.

[-] klemptor@startrek.website 1 points 2 weeks ago

The point of their existence is - and has always been - to line their own pockets. Thassit.

[-] Spaceballstheusername@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

How so. I always thought the things like forcing them to keep children till they're 26 and not being able to drop people for pre existing conditions were good for consumers.

[-] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago

It also mandated people buy coverage and let them have 20% overhead which is absurdly high. Marketplaces added subsidies for buying insurance, which is ultimately a benefit to the insurance company. It also expanded Medicaid, which pays out tons to insurance companies through HMO plans. It also gave them justification to raise rates, as they now had to cover more things.

Covering kids until 26 is nice, but it's basically free from the insurance company perspective. Covering pre-existing conditions is a negative, but there's still room to increase premiums from it. The overall affect of the bill was positive for insurance companies.

[-] gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 weeks ago

It also mandated people buy coverage

Which got dropped fast, which I think is good, myself, for the reason you stated next:

and let them have 20% overhead

[-] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

It's only saving graces were the payment assistance and blocking the insurance companies from denying coverage due to pre-existing conditions. Though the insurance companies found other ways to deny coverage.

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip -3 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, the only good thing about Trump possibly destroying the ACA is that I may provide the impetus to replace it with something better. I somewhat doubt that, but there's a chance, especially if we start seeing a lot more hate towards health insurance companies.

[-] prof_wafflez@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

No - I’m not letting this logic fester or gain traction. Trump and republicans do not want to replace the ACA. That’s a complete and total fantasy. Democrats took decades to get the ACA enacted, so once it’s gone it’s probably gone for decades. If republicans gave a damn they would’ve helped fix what is wrong with the ACA, but they’d rather full repeal with no plan to replace. Listen to what any of them say or do, they wear it as a badge of honor.

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 weeks ago

I meant after they destroy it and democrats, or whoever, take back power. Obviously Republicans aren't going to replace it with anything good.

[-] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 weeks ago

They had zero actual plan to replace it with anything last time they took it away, they didn't even really pretend to even have one.

[-] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

This won't work if Trump warps our government in order to install himself as president for life.

[-] sudo42@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

If caught, this guy could be convicted of a felony. He has also shot someone on “5th Avenue”. Likely this guy could get elected president and avoid serving any time. There’s precedent.

this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2024
544 points (98.2% liked)

News

23649 readers
2405 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS