685
We live in the dumbest timeline
(sh.itjust.works)
Eurofighter Typhoon shenanigans
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 13 Dec 2024
685 points (99.6% liked)
NonCredibleDefense
6788 readers
756 users here now
A community for your defence shitposting needs
Rules
1. Be nice
Do not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.
2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes
If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.
3. Content must be relevant
Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.
4. No racism / hatespeech
No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.
5. No politics
We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.
6. No seriousposting
We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.
7. No classified material
Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.
8. Source artwork
If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.
9. No low-effort posts
No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.
10. Don't get us banned
No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.
11. No misinformation
NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.
Join our Matrix chatroom
Other communities you may be interested in
- !militaryporn@lemmy.world
- !forgottenweapons@lemmy.world
- !combatvideos@sh.itjust.works
- !militarymoe@ani.social
Banner made by u/Fertility18
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
technically this one wasn't actually classified, it's just "NATO restricted" so if you live in a NATO country (or even some allied countries iirc) you can access it freely as if it was declassified, you just can't send it to China or Russia.
Like you can just freely Google that manual or purchase a physical copy without any sort of checks.
That isn't what NATO Restricted means, at least not in the US—I'm not going to attempt to delve into Hungarian law. It falls under the category of Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) established by Executive Order 13556, and codified in DoD Instruction 5200.48
This information is not freely available to the public, and must be cleared for release according to the procedures detailed in the aforementioned documents, which specify that it should only be disseminated for official government purposes.
Yeah, so it's not classified.
Unclassified is still a classification level and doesn't imply that it is meant for broader dissemination; CUI would need approval to be shared. People like you are why everyone has to suffer through annual training every year.
This hit me hard and now I'm angry. But it explains why I have to speed run sexual harassment and security training every year even though it seems like a capybara would know better than to do the things being warned against.
I feel like you're taking this a bit too seriously.
You literally know nothing John snow, and your ignorance is apparent to anyone with even passing experience in this space. I know this because I only have passing experience in this space related to dumbass cyber security rules.
I really don't get why everyone is taking my comment extremely seriously.
Oh I don't anymore, I just wrote this before I caught up on you being a waste.
Good to hear, remember this is NCD, and you should except people to make jokes and be a bit silly.
That's literally what classified means, that it has a classification. That classification is NATO Restricted.
As the other reply mentioned, it's "Controlled Unclassified Information" so it's in the name, unclassified.
That's not what that means. You've been told what it means.
Yes, and, like my first comment t said, it's technically not classified.
...technically, it's not not classified, it's unclassified...
...does unclassified require something to have first been classified?..semantically, certainly, but technically i have no idea...
You're still wrong and at this point, getting fucking annoying
Sure, whatever, if it means that much to you.
That's how we enforce Rule 7. By actually knowing what classified means.
Troll
Lol no