view the rest of the comments
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
I'm sure even more would be needed in my hypothetical scenario. Bozeman (Montana) has around only 58,459 total, and so yeah, the kind of strain on infrastructure to suddenly add huge numbers to a place like that would be incredibly disruptive.
In all seriousness, during the peak of the pandemic, I entertained the notion (mostly in my head, some of it shared with my family, but not too serious about it) of moving to Bozeman or maybe the surrounding area and working from there. Or maybe buying/renting a very small place and spending part of the time there.
But it seems like the cost of living went up there a lot during that time, too, and places like public parks were overrun, because many others had similar ideas. Also, the cost of living was already above average. I was under the impression it was fairly low, but that was very wrong. So yeah, in all honesty, not that this would ever happen anyway, but people would have to be spread around between the 4 states.
Even combining several of these states together would be a huge win, even if they stay deeply red. It would curtail the over-representation that qons and rural interests get. Throw Nebraska, Kansas, and Idaho in there, too, maybe.
Ha no kidding - I also entertained (still do a bit) the idea of moving to WY. I do really like the idea of flipping these low population places. A long term effort to encourage people to do it really would be worthwhile I think.
Combining some of them also makes a ton of sense for combating overrepresentation, especially because most of the time these low-pop states are very similar to their low-pop neighbors. Just wish there were a more politically plausible solution. DC/PR statehood seems more likely but not exactly likely either. Probably easiest is still just working to bring over some blue-collar high school educated rural voters.