593

Summary

Key leaders of the “Abandon Harris” movement, which encouraged voters to oppose Kamala Harris due to U.S. support for Israel during the Gaza war, are now expressing unease about Trump’s incoming administration.

Many in the movement, including prominent Muslim leaders, voted for Trump hoping he would bring peace to the Middle East.

However, concerns are growing over his Cabinet picks, such as Mike Huckabee and Tulsi Gabbard, which some see as troubling for Muslim communities.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Allonzee@lemmy.world 216 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I voted for Harris. I voted for Biden. I voted for Clinton.

I still wouldn't warn a single one of them if they were about to get hit by a bus.

Its harm reduction. They don't solve anything. They just keep us treading water sinking slowly whereas Republicans start taking a hammer to the hull to open up new holes.

[-] MellowYellow13@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

Those are all neoliberals, nothing good would come of them being president, and the voting results speak for themselves. Neoliberalism wont work in this country anymore, if you want to beat republicans, elect progressives.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 69 points 1 week ago

I voted for Harris. I voted for Biden. I voted for Clinton.

I still wouldn’t warn a single one of them if they were about to get hit by a bus.

American Democracy in a nutshell. You get two choices, they're both awful for different reasons. One of them wants to see you executed for your religious beliefs/sexual preferences/nation of origin. The other is continent to sell bunker buster bombs to some raving psychotic mass murderers overseas. Nobody is going to do shit about climate change, though, so we're all on the clock in the long run.

Its harm reduction.

It increasingly feels like the closest thing to harm reduction the US achieved was the time Trump fucked up his COVID response and a bunch of his senior leadership choked to death on their own lung fluid.

[-] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 14 points 6 days ago

There’s only one man who’s done any meaningful harm reduction in your country and your judicial system is charging him with terrorism.

[-] ochi_chernye@startrek.website 1 points 5 days ago

I generally agree with your point, but the MIC is a bad example; both parties are equally happy selling bombs to murderers.

[-] ubergeek@lemmy.today 47 points 1 week ago

bunch of his senior leadership choked to death on their own lung fluid.

[-] Dearth@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago

There was roughly 20 different elected positions on my ballot.

The real problem with American politics is everyone is so focused on the POTUS that they ignore the politicians who have an actual measurable effect on their quality of life.

I challenge anyone to look up your local town hall and see when the next city council meeting is. Go to it and see what they talk about and vote on. Notice the other people who go.

Many cities have public meetings for police oversite too. They're even less attended than city council meetings

[-] logi@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

Another massive problem is the voting system which could barely be designed better for forcing a two party system on you. There is no room for someone getting 30% of the vote and of course they should then have about that much influence.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago

I challenge anyone to look up your local town hall and see when the next city council meeting is. Go to it and see what they talk about and vote on. Notice the other people who go.

I've been to a few city council meetings. When you're there as part of an organization lobbying for a particular policy, you can at least see the terms of the debate and understand who to lobby, what the blockades are, and why a seemingly good-idea isn't getting through. But if you're just sitting in on meetings, its like tuning into CSPAN at a random point in the day. You've got no historical context. You don't know who you're listening to or why they're talking. And there's a ton of maneuvering going on behind the scenes that you can't glimpse because you're not really a part of it.

Add to the problem, a lot of people aren't really wedded to their communities. I live in a neighborhood in which people move in and out every five years or so, chasing a better job or looking for better schools or trying to find more garage space for their giant cars or cashing out on a sudden jump in their home price. Trying to get them engaged in a fight over the ten-year-plan for mass transit is basically impossible because most of them won't be here in ten years.

I don't say this to discourage anyone from going. But this isn't something you can just bootstrap your way into. You really need a community of more knowledgeable and engaged people to introduce you to what is going on and why. Otherwise, you're just listening to a couple of people argue over the preferred way to renovate municipal drainage on the opposite side of town for an hour.

[-] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 12 points 6 days ago

I gotta keep moving because my rent keeps going up. Let's hope I find that cheaper basement

[-] Tower@lemm.ee 17 points 1 week ago

It increasingly feels like the closest thing to harm reduction the US achieved was the time Trump fucked up his COVID response and a bunch of his senior leadership choked to death on their own lung fluid.

Herman Cain approves this message.

[-] Atrichum@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

American Democracy in a nutshell. You get two choices, they're both awful...

The democratic process doesn't start on election day.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago

Yeah, it starts when someone has a billion dollars and wants to influence government.

[-] DMCMNFIBFFF@lemmy.world 0 points 6 days ago

10 million Democrats x $100/each - $1 billion

People are more powerful than they think.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago

I'm not giving another dime to the Democratic Party so it's more like 9,999,999 Democrats.

I wouldn't even be in the party if we didn't have closed primaries in my state.

[-] DMCMNFIBFFF@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

fair enough.

1 million American leftists x $100 to Bernie Sanders or AOC in the primaries = $100 million

and

1 million American leftists x $100 to Green party = $100 million

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

I already donated a hundred bucks to Bernie.

It didn't work.

[-] LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Yes give them more money, they're doing such great things with the money that's already given to them.

[-] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

It started well into the election cycle after Biden refused to honor his one term pledge.

No time for a primary now! Oops didn't mean to! /$

First Past The Post voting has got to go, or else the USA is toast. A shame the democratic party believes themselves to be more important then the country itself.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 59 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Harm reduction is bad?

Obviously, it's not ideal, but one has to act according to the real life conditions... And in 2024, our only two options were "harm reduction," and literal fascism with literal concentration camps.

Fuck you if you didn't choose harm reduction.

[-] MellowYellow13@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

Neoliberalism and harm reduction wont work anymore. What the fuck do you think America has been doing the past three decades? If you want to beat republicans, you need to elect progressives, otherwise fascism will keep on rising.

[-] Allonzee@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

To be fair to them, we're just delaying collapse. It is a choice.

I agree with them that there's no saving this constitutional structure. In one sense it's cowardly, because there's no escape from this capitalist slaughterhouse hellscape without collapse. Collapse is necessary. Trump will certainly usher that in faster.

But Im too much of a softy to let the blood that always has to spill be on my hands.

This country was irreparable since Reagan, a zombie nation oligarch piggie bank. My vote was a cowardly one for a few more years of quiet orderly slaughter, NOT peace.

But we lost, so the slaughter will be loud and bigger than it's ever been, so maybe it's time for revolution if we want our kids to have anything left.

Because in 4 years the DNC WILL anoint someone to meet Trump's economy in the middle, and even I may not be able to stomach voting for that.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago

Kamala was in a weird place as well.

Normally it's easy for people to hold their noses for an incumbent. But if Kamala won. Shed run again in 2028.

Which would mean from 2012 to 2032, there wouldn't have been a fair Dem primary.

20 fucking years...

Party leaders don't understand that when you take primaries away, it hurts general turnout. Because regardless of who wins, the primary is the time for the eventual candidate to get their finger on the pulse and see what voters want.

Which is reliably that the Dem candidate moves left.

Without a primary they move right and turnout goes down.

We have literally decades of data that shows this, but it's not what the donors want and the present DNC wants donations more than votes.

Hopefully Winkler gets chair in a few months and that changes.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago

Some More News did a good summary of how the Democrats win when they have a primary - and move to the left - but lose when they don't.

[-] Allonzee@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The DNC would rather have Trump as POTUS than Sanders or AOC.

With Trump, the bribe money keeps flowing to both party machines, They are both paid to keep this sociopath owned economy safe from the people.

[-] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 days ago

AOC voted to protect the rail corporations from a union strike.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I think there's some truth in thinking that continuing to elect milquetoast corporatist neoliberal candidates just builds up more extremism and discontent as people continue to suffer under option A of 2 - so when eventually a neocon breaks through they tend to be bonkers. It's why I'm so fucking disappointed in Starmier as he's clearly going to do fuck all and likely hand the next election to the torries.

That said, that's a pretty fucking abstract view and there's always a chance we get lucky. I voted for Harris but I was really hoping we'd get Senator Harris who actually gave a shit and, even if I knew for certain she'd be underwhelming I'd still fucking vote for her because Trump was worse on every issue and would directly cause a lot of additional human suffering. Women would be forced into unwanted pregnancies, trans people would be suppressed or worse - deaths would come from increased incidents of suicide and self-medication, and, lastly, (and I know a fuck ton of pushback on this point here) more Palestinians would die as Trump accelerated genocide.

So yea, I really regret that we are constantly dealt such bad hands but harm reduction is always a good thing to pursue in the absence of better actions.

Seriously though, when Biden dropped out fuck absolutely everyone who defended the DNC anointing Harris instead of running a snap primary.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] djsoren19@yiffit.net 13 points 1 week ago

If you're only voting for harm reduction year after year and doing nothing to try and organize grassroots opposition to the lesser evil, yes constantly voting harm reduction is bad. It's how you allow lesser evils to grow into the larger evils of the current DNC, who care more about fundraising than winning.

[-] aesthelete@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

If you’re only voting for harm reduction year after year and doing nothing to try and organize grassroots opposition to the lesser evil, yes constantly voting harm reduction is bad.

The thing is that this is everyone in America. The left has practically no grassroots organization and expects online complaints about the DNC to magically accomplish something, and the right has astroturfed horse shit that that is on board with whatever the corporatist GOP wants to do.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ATDA@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

That been my realization. I voted for harm reduction for what 12 year now like a lot of us and have little to show for it if not less. Yes the other side is a factor but they also seem more successful in their braindead idiot agenda too.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] myrrh@ttrpg.network 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Fuck you if you didn’t choose harm reduction.

...thirty years of choosing harm reduction brought us to this point...

...i held my nose and voted against fascism, but if you want to blame someone, blame the f*cking fascists and blame the thirty years of harm reduction which enabled them: pluralities win, that's how american democracy works...

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (22 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2024
593 points (95.1% liked)

politics

19271 readers
1627 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS