cross-posted from: https://sh.itjust.works/post/30140601
Oleksandr deserted from the front line in eastern Ukraine after watching his fellow servicemen being pulverised by Russian bombardments for six months. Then, those remaining were ordered to counterattack.
It was the final straw for Oleksandr, 45, who had been holding the line in the embattled Lugansk region in the early months of the war. Even his commanding officer was reluctant to send his men back toward what looked like certain death. So when Oleksandr saw an opening to save his life, he did.
"We wanted to live. We had no combat experience. We were just ordinary working people from villages," the soft-spoken serviceman, who declined to give his last name, told AFP.
His decision is just one of many cases plaguing the Ukrainian military, which has already suffered at least 43,000 losses in nearly three years of fighting, President Volodymyr Zelensky revealed this month. The government is also struggling to recruit new troops. Together, these manpower problems present a critical hurdle for Ukraine, which is losing territory to Russia at the fastest rate since the early days of the February 2022 invasion.
The issue was put under the spotlight in September when 24-year-old serviceman Sergiy Gnezdilov announced in a scathing social media post that he was leaving his unit in protest over indefinite service. "From today, I am going AWOL with five years of impeccable soldiering behind me, until clear terms of service are established or until my 25th birthday," he wrote.
Figures published by the Ukrainian general prosecutor's office show that more than 90,000 cases have been opened into instances of soldiers going absent without leave or deserting since Russia invaded in 2022, with a sharp increase over the past year.
Oleksandr said that after leaving the frontline, he remembered little from the year he spent at home in the Lviv region owing to concussions he suffered while deployed. He recounted "mostly drinking" to process the horrors he witnessed but his guilt was mounting at the same time. He ultimately decided to return after seeing young Ukrainians enlist or wounded troops return to battle -- despite pleas from his family.
His brother was beaten during the historic Maidan protests in 2013 that toppled Ukraine's pro-Kremlin leader, and later died. His sister was desperate. "They're going to kill you. I would rather bring you food to prison than flowers to your grave," he recounted his sister telling him during a visit from Poland.
It was guilt, too, that motivated Buch, who identified himself by a military nickname, to return to battle. The 29-year-old deserted after being wounded in fierce fighting in southern Ukraine in late 2022 during the liberation of Kherson city. "Just staying under constant shelling gradually damages your mental state. You go crazy step by step. You are all the time under stress, huge stress," he said of his initial decision to abscond.
In an effort to address manpower shortages, Ukrainian lawmakers in August approved an amnesty for first-time offenders who voluntarily returned to their units.
Both the 47th and 53rd brigades in December announced they would welcome back servicemen who had left the front without permission, saying: "We all make mistakes." Prosecutors said in early December that 8,000 servicemen that went absent without leave or deserted had returned in November alone.
Still, Siver, commander of the 1st Separate Assault Battalion, known as Da Vinci, who also identified himself by his military nickname, said the number of Ukrainian troops fleeing the fighting without permission was growing. That is partly because many of the most motivated fighters have already been killed or wounded.
"Not many people are made for war," said Siver, describing how his perceptions of bravery had been reshaped by seeing those who stood their ground, and those who fled. "There are more and more people who are forced to go," he told AFP, referring to a large-scale and divisive army mobilisation campaign.
But other servicemen interviewed by AFP suggested that systemic changes in military culture -- and leadership -- could help deter desertions.
Buch said his military and medical training as well as the attitudes of his superiors had improved compared to his first deployment, when some officers "didn't treat us like people". Siver suggested that better psychological support could help troops prepare for the hardships and stress of battle.
"Some people think it's going to be like in a movie. Everything will be great, I'll shoot, I'll run," he said. "But it's different. You sit in a trench for weeks. Some of them are knee-deep in mud, cold and hungry." He said there was no easy solution to discouraging desertion, and predicted the trend would worsen. "How do you reduce the numbers? I don't even know how. We just have to end the war," he said.
Said president reneged on core election promises (getting closer to the EU), then faced protests, then decided he didn't like the protests and tried to become a dictator while ordering Berkut to shoot at protestors.
Which only increased the number and resolve of protestors, so the president went AWOL. He was then impeached -- the Rada has the authority to do that, and had the votes, but the procedure was cut short, arguably unconstitutionally so, yes. Be that as it may: There were elections soon after. That's the fun thing about democracies, you can heal fuckups by having the people be the judge.
Ukraine banned a political party early on in the war that just over 10% of the population supported in 2019, you mean.
It generally doesn't help your case when your party chairman is under investigation for high treason and happily partakes in a prisoner exchange. He's in Russia now.
Meanwhile, Germany is in the process of banning a party that currently polls at just under 20%. And yes of course the AfD should be banned they're Nazis, their influence and poll numbers in fact are a requirement for the ban: Back when the constitutional court had to decide about the NPD they said "they're small and irrelevant, thus not a present danger".
...I'll just assume you're American. You see shifts in the stock market and conclude that that is, for some reason, why people fight. You consider your own nation to be so exceptional that its stock exchange influences the decisions of people half-way around the globe. Ukrainians fight because they know what it's like to be a colony of Moscow. Because in the end you'd rather die in a trench giving Moscow hell than to die in a gulag building Moscow's weapons, or in a meat assault against Moscow's next victim.
Have you ever wondered what happened to all those men in the occupied territories? Sent to the front with fucking Mosin-Nagants. Such is life as a colony of Russia.
Euromaidan was a confluence of a lot of different factors. It's virtually impossible to quantify and categorize it under one umbrella term. Some call it a coup, some call it a revolution.
I think it's complicated. For example, there was a a genuine discontent among the population- with a lot of emphasis on the item you mentioned, the decision to not move closer to the EU. But there was more at play. Far-right organizations orchestrated and escalated the protests and intentionally provoked more violence. They understood, as many on the far-right do, that violence begets more violence. And violence is a great way to start a chain-reaction that topples the establishment.
It's something that's been increasing in frequency, some successful and some failing. Ie Jan 6th in the US and Jan 8th in Brazil. both right-wing storming of the capital in an attempt to disrupt the democratic process. In the US and Brazil, where there are stronger and more stable Democratic institutions... the establishment remained intact.
In Ukraine, it toppled like a house of cards.
Here's some leftist reading material
https://jacobin.com/2022/02/maidan-protests-neo-nazis-russia-nato-crimea
https://voxukraine.org/en/denial-of-the-obvious-far-right-in-maidan-protests-and-their-danger-today
and here's a research article looking at the violence that led to the eventual dismantling of the government
https://www.jstor.org/stable/26532701
Lots of this was funded by opposition parties
Which likewise received a lot of funding by the US - through organizations like NED. With billions spent in Ukraine since their independence in 91, roughly $200M annually, a lot of this money ultimately trickled down to the correct sources.
So here's the rub-
You talk about your anarchist comrades, so I'm guessing you're a leftist. But what Euromaidan was, if we're going try boil down a complex multifaceted event into a single sentence: a far-right coup supported by the US that toppled a democratically elected government and allowed a new government to be appointed unconstitutionally. That same government immediately started cooperating with the CIA after which Russia invaded literally only a couple days later.
Do you see why I think Ukraine is not some beacon of democracy? Of course Russia is a hellhole. But Ukraine is a banana republic. It's like Guatemala in the 50s or Cuba before the revolution. It's a government propped up for a purpose and it will be disposed of when it's no longer useful. And that moment is coming soon.
So if I put myself in the shoes of some joe schmoe, why should I risk my life and my family's life for this? It's a joke. The bigger the lie, the more people believe.
We're seeing such a large right-wing resurgence all over the globe that even self-identified leftists are supported right-wing causes. We're starting to see this in the US, for example, with the left becoming progressively more and more anti-immigrant. I don't know. I think we're doomed, if I'm being honest
Wasn't me but I'm also an Anarchist so w/e.
The fuck. A coup would not have resulted in elections. A far-right coup would not have resulted in the likes of right sector and svoboda losing seats. The "US support" narrative is complete BS, the type of work the US did in Ukraine is above board, also, the EU is way more involved.
Your whole line of reasoning here is contingent on wanting to prove the "US is exceptionally powerful and evil" narrative, shared by both the Kremlin and certain portions of the US left (or at least they think they're leftists).
You know what? Don't talk to me, it probably won't do a thing. Talk to people from Ukraine.
It doesn't want to be. Its people do not want it to be one, and they're willing to fight for it. And before you get confused, now: If Ukraine ever was anyone's banana republic at any point then Moscow's.
...there's not a single far-right party with a seat in the Rada. It's completely ALDE and EPP, with Opposition Platform being banned (those would be S&D if they weren't Russian stooges).