282

Joe Biden regrets having pulled out of this year’s presidential race and believes he would have defeated Donald Trump in last month’s election – despite negative poll indications, White House sources have said.

The US president has reportedly also said he made a mistake in choosing Merrick Garland as attorney general – reflecting that Garland, a former US appeals court judge, was slow to prosecute Donald Trump for his role in the 6 January 2021 insurrection while presiding over a justice department that aggressively prosecuted Biden’s son Hunter.

With just more than three weeks of his single-term presidency remaining, Biden’s reported rueful reflections are revealed in a Washington Post profile that contains the clearest signs yet that he thinks he erred in withdrawing his candidacy in July after a woeful debate performance against his rival for the White House, Trump, the previous month.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Erasmus@lemmy.world 108 points 6 days ago

Mr. I’m only gonna be a one term President seems to have a short memory, yet again.

Him and his staff misled and dragged their feet about his intentions early in then he went full out with ‘no I’m gonna run fuck you all’ and it turned into a disaster.

This is just one of the problems with the current Democratic Party. No one will work with and groom the upcoming young members to take control. The older party members literally do not have a clue what it means to step aside for the good of the party and the good of the country.

[-] Xanthobilly@lemmy.world 42 points 6 days ago

I wish this comment was higher. Biden betrayed the party and its chances of defeating Trump the moment he won the 2020 election and chose to not start preparing the nation on Jan 20th 2021 for a younger generation to lead. Merrick fucking Garland was the other, related, and just as large mistake. That one is totally on him.

[-] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 17 points 5 days ago

And Kamala has just never been a great candidate, but he could have taken actions to try to boost her prominence. Instead he saddled her with no-win issues throughout and jealously guarded any successes for himself. And the one big bad issue I remember that he didn't dump on her (the rail strike), he farmed out to Pete Buttigieg to be the face of the administration (even though it wasn't a DOT issue). It was almost like the goal was to sabotage any potential locus of political power that wasn't Biden and his inner circle.

I don't think a better grooming would have helped Harris when she wasn't willing to be not-Biden in any way other than being coherent, but it certainly didn't help and seems indicative of their lack of intention to ever transfer power.

[-] Xanthobilly@lemmy.world 11 points 5 days ago

An open primary would have helped.

[-] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 days ago

A massive look back (Whenever we have the ability for free press again after Trump) on the consistent self sabotage of Clinton-Biden-Harris would become a new The Prince for future generations of leaders.

"It's better to be feared as a leader than to be loved as one."

"It's better to not shoot yourself in the foot and then declare you're good for a 10K, after saying the last 4K was your last."

[-] Asafum@feddit.nl 28 points 6 days ago

The older party members literally do not have a clue what it means to step aside for the good of the party and the good of the country.

"They young care too much about disrupting our economy (making it more fair which means less for my ~~owners~~ donors) we can't have that."

[-] kandoh@reddthat.com 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I have a fun test for you, it will inform you if your information ecosystem is informing you or misinforming you

Mr. I’m only gonna be a one term President seems to have a short memory, yet again.

You clearly remember this as a big promise during Biden's 2020 campaign - but can you actually find evidence of him saying this, ever?

Can you find anything official - with a name attached to it - of the Biden campaign saying anything about only serving for one term?

[-] Xanthobilly@lemmy.world 16 points 6 days ago

Google gives a bunch of examples. Did he actually say it to the press? Perhaps not. Was it discussed and was his age recognized as a liability within his campaign in 2020? Absolutely yes.

[-] kandoh@reddthat.com 10 points 6 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

They all, all reference the exact same quote each article.

“If Biden is elected,” a prominent adviser to the campaign said, “he’s going to be 82 years old in four years and he won’t be running for reelection.”

The adviser argued that public acknowledgment of that reality could help Biden mollify younger voters, especially on the left, who are unexcited by his candidacy and fear that his nomination would serve as an eight-year roadblock to the next generation of Democrats.

By signaling that he will serve just one term and choosing a running mate and Cabinet that is young and diverse, Biden could offer himself to the Democratic primary electorate as the candidate best suited to defeat Trump as well as the candidate who can usher into power the party’s fresh faces.

None of that was official, it was all just the campaign's attempt to shore up an issue they had without an actual commitment and you fell for it.

[-] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 10 points 5 days ago

None of that was official, it was all just the campaign’s attempt to shore up an issue they had without an actual commitment and you fell for it.

That's not a failure of the media, that's a deception by the campaign. Unless you think the media lied about a prominent advisor saying that, they did their job.

If they were off the reservation, there should have been a firing, but just because they're putting out statements through unofficial side channels doesn't make it not a message from the campaign.

[-] kreskin@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

off the reservation

that phrase was used to describe native americans who ventured outside of the confines of the reservations they had been forced into. You can imagine what happened to them if caught. That phrase has a dark, dark, history.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago

Well, then they should've repudiated it a lot sooner (i.e. during the 2020 campaign), because to allow the misconception to exist is tantamount to confirming it.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

None of that was official, it was all just the campaign’s attempt to shore up an issue they had without an actual commitment and you fell for it.

Vote for us! We lied to you!

Yeah, great look.

[-] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 5 days ago

I am amazed of the mental gymnastics.

"Can you find proof of this?"

"Yes, dozens of reputable sources give proof."

"Well that's not good enough, what I meant was you're a moron for never thinking a 78 year old man with dementia would be great for 8 years as the hardest job in America."

[-] SulaymanF@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

His campaign unofficially put that out in 2020, since he was near the bottom of the primary rankings. Campaigns that desperate start to float ideas as a trial balloon, to see if it would help or not. That’s how this works; a suggestion given by campaign staff that he can formally deny if it hurts his campaign or embrace if it’s helping. Once he started to gain ground in the primaries he backed off of the idea. He did many of these trial ideas.

this post was submitted on 28 Dec 2024
282 points (90.8% liked)

News

23722 readers
3334 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS