786
submitted 6 days ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Summary

Churches across the U.S. are grappling with dwindling attendance and financial instability, forcing many to close or sell properties.

The Diocese of Buffalo has shut down 100 parishes since the 2000s and plans to close 70 more. Nationwide, church membership has dropped from 80% in the 1940s to 45% today.

Some churches repurpose their land to survive, like Atlanta’s First United Methodist Church, which is building affordable housing.

Others, like Calcium Church in New York, make cutbacks to stay open. Leaders warn of the long-term risks of declining community and support for churches.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] cows_are_underrated@feddit.org 66 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Some churches repurpose their land to survive, like Atlanta’s First United Methodist Church, which is building affordable housing.

That's something more churches should do. They always preach about "helping the poor" but most don't give a fuck.

[-] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 22 points 6 days ago

If every church took in two homeless people, there would be no homeless in America...

[-] soul@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago

They're more than happy to take in everyone's dollars, though. Can't get enough of those.

[-] Malfeasant@lemm.ee 2 points 6 days ago

Reverend Larry:

I DO want your money, because god wants your money.

[-] nickiwest@lemmy.world 16 points 6 days ago

One of the best things my family church did to reach out to the community was running a low-cost daycare center in our tiny rural town. It helped local families, bolstered the church's finances, and brought new families into the church.

Unfortunately, it was an Assembly of God church with toxic teachings that I'm still working through decades later. So ... straights and roundabouts, I guess.

[-] solstice@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

People often make the argument that churches do a lot of community service and charity work. Why, then, do you need to include the fairy tale nonsense of mystical deities? We can totally have organized groups of volunteers that do nice things for people, WITHOUT the mythological element involved.

[-] nickiwest@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

I've since left the church and I don't disagree with you. It shouldn't be necessary to involve religion in providing needed services to a community.

But I also haven't seen a lot of non-religious organizations offering practical services directly to the people who need them the most.

Don't get me wrong: there are a lot of great nonprofit organizations that do amazing work. But they aren't necessarily offering subsidized daycare or affordable housing on a scale that meets the needs of the communities where they operate. And very few of them are reaching out to people in rural areas. Churches still have something of a monopoly in those places.

I think this is largely due to the fact that faith communities have more cohesion than secular groups. All of the small secular groups I've been involved with have fallen apart after a year or two because the bonds that hold them together are simply not as strong as those in churches.

The whole bit about giving 10% of your income to the church as a duty to God is a fantastic racket. It means that the true believers think that God is keeping a ledger, and therefore they are more likely to support their church financially. So people in churches are literally more invested in their religious community, which gives their church the resources to provide services as social outreach.

And that's not even getting into the power structures within the church and the role of a pastor as leader (that was missing from all of the secular groups I had experience with). Or the organizing power of a group of dedicated little old church ladies.

There are a lot of elements that churches are better at harnessing. And I haven't encountered a good solution for creating a secular organization with the same kind of strength.

[-] kmaismith@lemm.ee 1 points 5 days ago

Strictly speaking, you don’t. Several denominations tried to throw out the mysticism in the 60s to significant backlash of the congregations. Mainstream denominational seminaries are actually pretty open minded from what i hear.

The triune mysticism can be looked at as an act by many denominations, it can’t be dropped because not enough of us skeptics engage with the religious systems locally to justify changing theology. If official positions becoke “well the trinity isn’t actually…” they risk loosing significant numbers of members. Changing that requires skeptical people to earnestly engage with churches and their congregations.

[-] alzjim@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

Those poor children. Churches and religion should be no where near education.

[-] brlemworld@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago

Almost like taxing them would have been better for society all along.

this post was submitted on 29 Dec 2024
786 points (98.6% liked)

News

23738 readers
2970 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS