387
submitted 5 days ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/news@lemmy.world

They found more pipe bombs in a bedroom inside Mr. Spafford’s house, loosely stuffed in a backpack that bore a patch shaped like a hand grenade and a logo reading “#NoLivesMatter,” prosecutors said.

No Lives Matter is a nihilistic, far-right ideology that largely exists on encrypted online messaging apps like Telegram

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 5 days ago

I wonder what the holdup was, taking over a year to move on information, and then only on the pretense of a sawed-off shotgun as a reason. It seems really, REALLY cautious.

I wonder if neighbor was being pressed to "infiltrate" the circle. Something's really off here.

[-] Kite@sh.itjust.works 19 points 5 days ago

The way the guy talked, he seemed to imply he knew about a lot of other people involved in that movement. Perhaps the FBI was just really making sure all of their i's were dotted and t's were crossed so nothing goes wrong with bringing him in and getting him to divulge a lot of information. Or.. the guy has already blown off half of a hand making his explosives. Maybe the FBI was waiting in the hopes he'd blow the rest of himself to kingdom come and they wouldn't have to deal with him lol.

[-] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 14 points 5 days ago

I imagine that the hold up was trying to find out who his friends are and what they were preparing for.

The neighbor reported that Mr. Spafford had told him that he and his friends were “preparing for something” that he “would not be able to do alone,” the court papers said.

My suspicion is that he and his friends were planning on taking out Harris (and maybe others) if she won the election. Since Trump won, they are moving now before he and his friends can dispose of evidence.

[-] foggy@lemmy.world 15 points 5 days ago

My guess is legality of methods obtaining info.

I can have "on good authority" that you're doing XYZ, but that doesn't mean I can go snooping in your private shit. I need probable cause.

That's not really an issue for an agency that can have secret warrants issued.

[-] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 3 points 4 days ago

Correct, but they still have to convince a judge to issue that secret warrant.

The judge would require probable cause, which doesn't have to be slam dunk evidence, but it does still have to be obtained legally.

OP was saying that the FBI could easily wiretap, but in order to make the evidence legally permitted in court, they'd still need probable cause to get the secret warrant that would allow them to do the wiretap.

It's sort of a loop-hole-in-a-loop-hole with the courts.

Usually the FBI just has to use the non-legal wiretap to point them to a good source of probable cause. Then they issue that to the judge, get their secret warrant, then make the non-legal wiretap legal.

[-] obviouspornalt@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 4 days ago

Also parallel construction is a thing

[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

He and nobody who lived with him had any outstanding warrants, otherwise they probably would have sent in the national guard and we'd be seeing Tankies defend him on the front page tomorrow.

this post was submitted on 31 Dec 2024
387 points (98.5% liked)

News

23738 readers
2953 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS