485
submitted 2 days ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Summary

Tesla reported its first annual decline in deliveries, with 1.79 million vehicles delivered in 2024 compared to 1.81 million in 2023.

Fourth-quarter deliveries (495,570) fell short of analyst estimates, causing Tesla shares to drop 7%.

Challenges included rising competition in Europe and China, declining sales despite price cuts, and growing inventory of Cybertrucks.

Analysts cited CEO Elon Musk’s political involvement as a potential distraction.

While Tesla plans to release lower-cost autonomous vehicles in 2025, its lack of affordable EVs and intensified competition have strained its market dominance.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 183 points 2 days ago

Bear in mind - Tesla is massively overvalued.

[-] Pulsar@lemmy.world 132 points 2 days ago

I think Tesla is fairly valued.

[-] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 76 points 2 days ago

Holy hell that really puts things in perspective 😮

[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Could you explain it to me? (no sarcasm) It seems to be saying that the stock prices are way out of balance to what it's worth. Are there regulations around that?

Edit: I'm talking about the Market Cap part. I don't understand how the value can be that high compared to all of the other companies, especially China.

[-] CountVon@sh.itjust.works 61 points 2 days ago

Market capitalization is just simple math, multiplying a company's stock price by the number of shares that have been issued. Tesla has issued roughly 3.2 billion shares and is currently trading at around $550, which makes their current market cap about $1.75 trillion dollars.

I don’t understand how the value can be that high compared to all of the other companies, especially China.

On its face it seems utterly nonsensical that Tesla is worth as much as all other auto makers combined, when Tesla only accounts for something like 5% of total US car sales. There are two reasons I can think of why this is currently so:

  • Tesla accounts for roughly half of all US electric vehicle sales, and electric vehicle sales are roughly 10% of all US vehicle sales. If electric vehicles largely replace ICE vehicles and if Tesla maintains that share of EV sales, then Tesla will be an extremely valuable company. Investors might be betting on a) electric vehicles and b) Tesla continuing to the win the lion's share of electric vehicle sales.
  • Tesla investors are irrational. Personally, my money is on this one. I think long-term Tesla is going to get crushed by cheaper and better-built EVs, probably from China but also possibly from other existing car manufacturers. Sometimes I'm tempted to short Tesla's stock based on this belief, but to quote John Maynard Keynes: "Markets can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent."
[-] Cornelius_Wangenheim@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It's more that Tesla is a bubble. The thing with bubbles is that it's actually completely rational to buy into them while they're inflating. As long as you get out before they pop, you can make a ton of money.

[-] obviouspornalt@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 1 day ago

All of that, plus an additional bit of irrationally, since SpaceX is private, some investors are in Tesla with the idea that some future corporate action will cause Tesla shares to eventually include SpaceX ownership as well.

[-] Glemek@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Rational might be stretching it a bit. There's a reason this is called the Greater Fool Theory.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greater_fool_theory

It's rational on an individual level because you can know it's a bubble, know the company is overvalued and yet still conclude that the best move is to buy. It's risky, but the question is if the risk/reward ratio is better or worse than the alternatives. In the case of TSLA, you'd have made well over 10x your money if you had bought in 2019. It's why bubbles keep happening despite everyone knowing they exist and will pop eventually.

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago

I subscr to the theory that Tesla is valued not as an automotive stock but as a tech stock. Companies like Toyota and VW are valued wildly different from companies like Google and Amazon and tesla has long pushed for everyone to think of it as far more like apple than like Honda, with quite a bit of success. That's why Elon does his whole Tony stark/Steve jobs routine and swears full self driving and other revolutionary tech. Because otherwise you have to look at his vehicles as the gilded Yugos they are that do have some really great aspects, but ones that are now being done by companies like Hyundai that can actually assemble a car well

[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 15 points 2 days ago

Thank you for explaining it so well. I thought that was what it was, but it seems insane to be valued that much higher to investors. Turns out, it probably is insane.

[-] idunnololz@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

And remember if you want to try to cash in on this information "Markets can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent"

[-] khannie@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

The entire circle represents total value for all car makers. Area taken up is their ratio of the total. It's geographically colour coded.

[-] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Tesla makes a lot more profit per car sold than the other OEMs, and part of the stock price assumed continued growth which would mean even more record profits.

In 2023, Tesla made more net profit than Ford and GM combined on their 1.8m vehicles compared to their 10.6m. Tesla also had really strong growth until this year, and extrapolating the growth and the profits they make led to a higher price. (edit: and in 2022 GM/Ford combined were just slightly above Tesla)

Tesla also has their energy division which is growing rapidly and has better margins than the cars (>100% YoY growth in 2024 and potentially > 100% in 2025)

Nowadays though, it's more on the future potential of FSD/Robotics which is a huge wildcard.

People don't see Ford or GM or Toyota massively expanding so they don't get a higher P/E ratio. In actuality, they've got years of suffering ahead of them during the transition.

Then you have companies like Nissan failing being one of the first domino's in the EV transition, and VW getting destroyed in China causing massive layoffs (25%) and a planned 700k vehicle reduction in 2025.

I'm not saying they deserve the price they have today, but it's more than just cars sold to get to a number, it's looking at future potential.

[-] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 25 points 2 days ago

Yep, no problems here whatsoever.

[-] nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca 16 points 2 days ago

You need another of these to go with it that shows these companies in terms of revenue.

[-] PumpkinEscobar@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago

Seriously, I’d love to see this chart, earnings chart and PE ratio chart to really see the whole picture

[-] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I don't have a chart for you but

2023 net profit

Toyota - 31.82b

VW AG- 17.331B

Tesla - 14.999b

BMW - 12.165B

GM - 10.1b

Ford - 4.347B

BYD - 4.16B

Edit: Just to preempt this, yes Tesla is suffering a lot more this year with the EV price wars, for the first 3 quarters, they're at 4.78b this year, whereas GM for example is at 8.97B. GM doesn't make a lot of profits (if any) on their EVs, but they still have ICE vehicles to fall back on whereas Tesla doesn't.

[-] JWBananas@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago
[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago

So the graphic shows the overvalued stock as proof of it being fairly valued?

[-] kautau@lemmy.world 48 points 2 days ago

My guess is there’s an invisible /s there

[-] pennomi@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago

It takes a lot of guts to omit the /s these days. You can never be quite sure who’s funny and who’s just an idiot.

[-] thefartographer@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

Por que no los both?

[-] thefartographer@lemm.ee 15 points 2 days ago
[-] kautau@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

I think most did

[-] Ioughttamow@fedia.io 4 points 2 days ago

Felt it in me bones

[-] windowsphoneguy@feddit.org 8 points 2 days ago

The graphic doesn't draw any conclusions, does it?

[-] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 days ago

Not at all. The billionaire oligarchs are in on the plan. They're using Tesla to get even more rich. They'll pull out/short just before something happens to cause Tesla to lose all it's value.

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

It's more like a variant game of chicken. The longer everyone stays in the higher the value goes, but once people start bailing you better hope you sold enough for it to be worthwhile. The big investors set the game but they're also the most constrained because if they pull out entirely or quickly they can pop the bubble and they may not be able to sell their shares fast enough to get all their money before shares plummet.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Technically that thing has already happened. Or, is still happening I guess.

[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 days ago

Truly Elon is a Savant of our time to build such an incredibly successful company while failing to even capture an appreciable proportion of actual sales. Real "voice of a generation" level shit.

[-] psivchaz@reddthat.com -1 points 2 days ago

What on Earth are you talking about? Someone posted a thing above that shows Tesla at #3 in profits.That's pretty big. The dude sucks, and he's openly tossing money around trying to influence elections, and he is a known liar and fraud. The company is way overvalued. You don't have to exaggerate and say Tesla fails at selling cars to criticize him.

[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago

But Tesla does fail at selling cars. They're an unprofitable company that sells far fewer cars than their bloated valuation justifies.

[-] SeaJ@lemm.ee 6 points 2 days ago

Their revenue is about half of Ford's.

[-] NewNewAccount@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Shocked Ferrari is worth more than Volkswagen. I wonder how much of that is F1-related.

[-] mkwt@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Now do one that counts vehicles delivered.

[-] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 56 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I mean, all that proves is that the Stock Market is completely irrational and always has been and using as a metric for whether or not "the economy" is doing good has always been a fucking farce.

Tesla isn't the only massively overvalued company in existence at the moment, just the biggest and most obvious example.

Theranos was valued at around $9 billion before it all came out that it was a scam.

[-] baldingpudenda@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

Damn, I remember that reddit post about the lab rat being told to falsify evidence or lie. I have a friend who's in the industry and he was going crazy about it.

[-] BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 17 points 2 days ago

The day that bubble bursts will be hilarious. I'll probably grab popcorn and livestream Twitter for Musky's meltdown

[-] uberdroog@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

It took some work, but I got them out of my 401k. So many funds have TSLA stock.

this post was submitted on 02 Jan 2025
485 points (98.8% liked)

News

23730 readers
4576 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS