126
How active is Lemmy now?
(discuss.online)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2025
126 points (90.9% liked)
Fediverse
28819 readers
372 users here now
A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).
If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!
Rules
- Posts must be on topic.
- Be respectful of others.
- Cite the sources used for graphs and other statistics.
- Follow the general Lemmy.world rules.
Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Just say 40,000. Which is a pathetic number, but perfectly fine for the type of niche communities budding up here and there across all the domains connected together here.
40k users is huge. Remember, lemmy is not profit driven. We don't need to grow at all costs, we can grow naturally and sustainably.
40000 is enough to be a functioning social media. most fediverse softwares don't have that much. Sure, it is not enough to have discussions over non mainstream stuff, but there are still enough people for a variety of topics.
....I kinda like it right now. Some communities of less than a 1000 have much more human responses. It nice. And not just from one server.
There are huge subreddits that are basically dead or just filled with spam. The ratio of active/passive users on Lemmy must be much much larger. A Lemmy community with 100 active members almost feels like a subreddit with 10 000 members.
The density of quality users and interactions on Lemmy nowadays reminds me of Reddit’s earlier days
A Lemmy community with 100 active members is more likely to be 100 active humans than a subreddit with 10,000 members is, based on the last time I went to Reddit: it was so, so clear that everything was either ChatGPT, or a repost of shit even I had already seen, or was just otherwise obviously not an authentic human sharing something interesting.
So yeah, not entirely surprising.
It might also be that we were some of the prolific posters on reddit. I heard somewhere that the top couple percent of posters on reddit used to make a majority of the new posts. And the rest lurk
That's probably true, though I'm not sure who has ever actually made a legitimate determination since you'd have to remove the non-humans from the numbers first and, well, Reddit isn't going to tank their MAU numbers by ever releasing that kind of stat.
It's also not helped once you hit a certain size and the nature of scale takes over and the level of toxicity goes up: even in small groups, when a new person shows up and asks the same question for the 20th time, they start taking shit for it. If you're in a BIG group, it turns into a giant dogpile, and people stop asking questions because who the hell likes that kind of response, so you end up with a lot of people who are subscribed to something, but none of whom actually contribute at all.
We're actually at about 43k
43.001k! I just joined with my own instance in my over engineered lab 🧪
Welcome!
I would have, but they asked in millions and I was being cheeky.
I don't find it pathetic, I'm quite happy with it. Sure, I'd be happy to get more but in no rush.