[-] TheFrirish@jlai.lu 3 points 2 days ago

I mean depending on the instance it's quite bad here as well

[-] TheFrirish@jlai.lu 3 points 2 days ago

Great I wonder when will it be available in Nixos unstable

[-] TheFrirish@jlai.lu 6 points 3 days ago

I'd like to know what the removed comments said although I highly suspect that they were along the lines of saying something like this is a war crime blah blah blah. Yes I have seen Ukraine commit a few war crimes (mercy killings and such) but it pales in comparison to what the Armed forces of Russia have done. I'm too lazy to find a list but between beheadings, shooting down prisoners, torturing and shooting civilians, Mass graves....

Ukraine is fighting with it's hands tied while Russia is free to engage in any way it wants. Is this a "dirty" tactic? Yes but it's necessary against such an enemy.

[-] TheFrirish@jlai.lu 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

As long as the title is in line with the videos content I don't mind but whenever I see the word "slams" it grinds my gears

[-] TheFrirish@jlai.lu 6 points 6 days ago

I choose my distro based on if KDE will crash or not.

So far on my hardware only NixOS has not got that issue out of the box.

[-] TheFrirish@jlai.lu 141 points 4 weeks ago

but getting blind drunk in the street every night for them is fine. Ridiculous.

80
submitted 4 weeks ago by TheFrirish@jlai.lu to c/world@lemmy.world

SYDNEY, Sept 12 (Reuters) - Australia said it will fine internet platforms up to 5% of their global revenue for failing to prevent the spread of misinformation online, joining a worldwide push to rein in borderless tech giants but angering free speech advocates.

The government said it would make tech platforms set codes of conduct governing how they stop dangerous falsehoods spreading, to be approved by a regulator. The regulator would set its own standard if a platform failed to do so, then fine companies for non-compliance.

The legislation, to be introduced in parliament on Thursday, targets false content that hurts election integrity or public health, calls for denouncing a group or injuring a person, or risks disrupting key infrastructure or emergency services.

The bill is part of a wide-ranging regulatory crackdown by Australia, where leaders have complained that foreign-domiciled tech platforms are overriding the country's sovereignty, and comes ahead of a federal election due within a year.

Already Facebook owner Meta (META.O), opens new tab

has said it may block professional news content if it is forced to pay royalties, while X, formerly Twitter, has removed most content moderation since being bought by billionaire Elon Musk in 2022.

"Misinformation and disinformation pose a serious threat to the safety and wellbeing of Australians, as well as to our democracy, society and economy," said Communications Minister Michelle Rowland in a statement.

"Doing nothing and allowing this problem to fester is not an option."

An initial version of the bill was criticised in 2023 for giving the Australian Communications and Media Authority too much power to determine what constituted misinformation and disinformation, the term for intentionally spreading lies.

Rowland said the new bill specified the media regulator would not have power to force the takedown of individual pieces of content or user accounts. The new version of the bill protected professional news, artistic and religious content, while it did not protect government-authorised content.

Some four-fifths of Australians wanted the spread of misinformation addressed, the minister said, citing the Australian Media Literary Alliance.

Meta, which counts nearly nine in 10 Australians as Facebook users, declined to comment. Industry body DIGI, of which Meta is a member, said the new regime reinforced an anti-misinformation code it last updated in 2022, but many questions remained.

X was not immediately available for comment.

Opposition home affairs spokesman James Paterson said that while he had yet to examine the revised bill, "Australians' legitimately-held political beliefs should not be censored by either the government, or by foreign social media platforms".

The Australia Communications and Media Authority said it welcomed "legislation to provide it with a formal regulatory role to combat misinformation and disinformation on digital platforms".

322
submitted 6 months ago by TheFrirish@jlai.lu to c/opensource@lemmy.ml

The successor of Openboard, Heliboard finally comes out in 1.0 my favorite open source keyboard out there.

[-] TheFrirish@jlai.lu 51 points 9 months ago

I mean the sentiment in the comments in that thread is not at all positive. The damage the tankies/hexbear/lemmygrad has done to the reputation of lemmy is not negligible.

imho It's important to help people stear away from those places when they join lemmy except if that is their intention.

[-] TheFrirish@jlai.lu 42 points 1 year ago

should have been an ad blocker it's 2023.

[-] TheFrirish@jlai.lu 52 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I might get flack for this but I despise them for their greenwashing. removing the headphone jack to sell their own Bluetooth headphones was mmmmmmh move at best.

[-] TheFrirish@jlai.lu 37 points 1 year ago

What the hell is wrong with people in this comment section? yeah if the genders were reversed blah blah blah be pragmatic and enjoy that pussy ffs.

[-] TheFrirish@jlai.lu 34 points 1 year ago

what's beyond me is that 95% of people won't care. We will of course but most will just put up with it.

1
submitted 1 year ago by TheFrirish@jlai.lu to c/france@lemmy.world

Dans un rapport, l’ONG fait état, entre autres, de passages à tabac, d’arrestations arbitraires et de vol d’argent et d’effets personnels de la part des forces de sécurité.

Les forces de sécurité tunisiennes ont commis « de graves abus », ces derniers mois, contre les migrants subsahariens, qui devraient inciter l’Union européenne (UE) à « cesser son soutien » à ce pays dans la lutte contre l’immigration irrégulière, plaide l’ONG Human Rights Watch (HRW) dans un rapport, mercredi 19 juillet.

HRW précise avoir recueilli plus de 20 témoignages de « victimes de violations des droits humains aux mains des autorités tunisiennes », selon un communiqué qui dénonce les agissements « de la police, des militaires, des gardes-côtes ». « Ces abus documentent des passages à tabac, des arrestations et détentions arbitraires, des expulsions collectives, des actions dangereuses en mer, des évictions forcées, le vol d’argent et d’effets personnels », selon HRW.

Parmi les personnes interviewées, neuf sont reparties dans leurs pays à bord de vols de rapatriement en mars et huit sont encore en Tunisie. Sept autres font partie d’un groupe de « 1 200 Africains noirs expulsés et transférés de force par les forces de sécurité tunisiennes aux frontières avec la Libye et l’Algérie début juillet », affirme HRW.

Parmi les personnes interviewées, neuf sont reparties dans leurs pays à bord de vols de rapatriement en mars et huit sont encore en Tunisie. Sept autres font partie d’un groupe de « 1 200 Africains noirs expulsés et transférés de force par les forces de sécurité tunisiennes aux frontières avec la Libye et l’Algérie début juillet », affirme HRW.

A la suite d’affrontements ayant coûté la vie à un Tunisien le 3 juillet, des centaines de migrants subsahariens ont été chassés de la ville de Sfax (centre-est), principal point de départ pour l’émigration clandestine vers l’Europe, avant d’être transférés vers des zones inhospitalières près de la Libye, à l’est, et l’Algérie, à l’ouest. Les témoignages recueillis par l’ONG montrent qu’ils ont été laissés sans eau, ni nourriture, ni abri, en plein désert.

« Electrochocs »

Selon le rapport, « la majorité des abus documentés ont eu lieu après le discours, le 21 février, du président Kaïs Saïed, dans lequel il pourfendait l’immigration clandestine, dénonçant l’arrivée de “hordes de migrants” venus, selon lui, “changer la composition démographique de la Tunisie” ».

Les personnes interrogées assurent avoir subi des violences dans des postes de police, où certains « ont subi des électrochocs ». D’autres ont dénoncé des « arrestations et détentions arbitraires basées sur leur couleur de peau », sans contrôle préalable de leurs papiers. Plusieurs se plaignent « d’abus lors d’opérations d’interception et de sauvetage près de Sfax », disant avoir été « frappés, volés, laissés à la dérive sans moteur et insultés », selon HRW.

L’ONG, qui a écrit au gouvernement tunisien fin juin sans recevoir de réponse, exhorte l’UE à stopper ses aides à la lutte contre l’immigration clandestine en Tunisie « jusqu’à une évaluation de leur impact pour les droits humains ». « En finançant les forces de sécurité qui commettent des abus, l’UE partage la responsabilité pour les souffrances infligées aux migrants, réfugiés et demandeurs d’asile », a souligné Lauren Seibert, une chercheuse de HRW citée dans le rapport.

L’UE et la Tunisie ont conclu « un partenariat stratégique », dimanche, qui prévoit l’octroi par Bruxelles de 105 millions d’euros à Tunis sous forme d’équipements et pour financer un « retour volontaire » de 6 000 Subsahariens.

2
submitted 1 year ago by TheFrirish@jlai.lu to c/world@lemmy.world

Nearly 10 months after Iran’s so-called “morality police” disappeared from the streets during mass protests over the death in custody of Mahsa Amini, the Iranian police announced July 16 that they had resumed patrols targeting “immoral clothing.” Amateur videos and first-hand reports from our Observers in Iran indicate that the patrols had resumed in the days before the announcement. But with many Iranian women having gotten used to going out with their heads uncovered in recent months, it remains unclear whether the patrols will be able to stop them.

Amini, 22, was arrested by members of Iran’s Guidance Patrol on September 13, 2022 for allegedly not wearing a headscarf, and died three days later. Her death sparked months of mass protests that resulted in more than 500 deaths, thousands of injuries, and tens of thousands of demonstrators arrested.

Now the Iranian regime is cracking down.On July 16, Saeed Montazer Al-Mahdi, spokesman for the Iranian police, announced that the morality police would resume conducting morality patrols. “Following massive demand by several groups of people, and the urging of the president and the head of the judiciary to achieve a safer society and enforce family values, police patrols will, from today, alert persons wearing immoral clothing and, if they insist, report them to the courts.”

The protests, under the slogan “Woman, Life, Freedom,” led many Iranian women to refuse to wear the Islamic hijab in public, defying Iran’s mandatory hijab laws. Guidance Patrol units stopped patrolling, and Iran’s regular police had to focus on breaking up the protests, not enforcing hijab rules.

In this video posted on Twitter the man filming says the woman in black is an officer of Iran's Gasht-e-Ershad morality police making an arrest in the Gisha neighbourhood of north Tehran on July 15, 2023.

Many Iranians on social media report seeing police conducting morality patrols on the streets in recent days. They have posted images showing women with their heads uncovered being stopped by women in black chadors accompanied by uniformed male police officers. Police vehicles are visible in the images, along with unmarked white vans.

Most of the posts on social media report seeing the patrols merely order women to put on a headscarf, but there are also videos suggesting arrests are being made.

Montazer Al-Mahdi did not specifically mention the Guidance Patrol (known as Gasht-e-Ershad in Persian), and it was unclear whether the new patrols are being conducted by regular police or personnel from the religious police unit. Iran’s attorney general had announced in January that the Guidance Patrol was being disbanded, but it was denied by state media.

Iranian authorities have for months been using traffic-surveillance cameras to detect women drivers and passengers without hijabs, and using the vehicles’ licence plates to identify the women and summon them to court to pay fines.

“Young women aren’t afraid of arrest or fines”

Niusha [not her real name], an Iranian woman in Tehran who has refused to wear Islamic clothing in public places for more than a year, explains what is now happening on the streets of Iran:

“I go outside as I please, wearing a T-shirt and shorts. However, I have seen patrols of the morality police in several places in Tehran in the north and in the city centre, although I have not seen or heard of them arresting anyone yet.

I have seen their female officers in black chadors as usual. But now they are in white vans, whereas their vehicles used to be white and green [official colours of Iranian police vehicles].

On the other hand, I know many women who have been summoned to court. The Islamic Republic agents have reported them to the authorities for not wearing Islamic dress in public places and the women have been brought before a judge and are now waiting for their verdict.

The caption of this video posted on Twitter 17 July 2023 says it shows officers of Iran's morality police checking women for hijab violations in the western city of Kermanshah.

And the number of threatening text messages to women drivers in cars has increased. Traffic cameras are used to check whether the women in the car are wearing an Islamic hijab or not, and if not, they send a text message and fine the car owner, sometimes impounding the car for a while.

But middle-class families who have to go to work every day need their car, and some of them might fold. One of my friends, who has not once worn a headscarf in the last few months, put one in her car as a precaution.

”This video posted on Telegram shows Iranians in the city of Rasht protesting following the arrest of three women on 16 July 2023 for not wearing Islamic hijab on the street.

On July 17, media outlets close to the state claimed a judge in the Tehran province sentenced a woman to work in a morgue in Tehran for not wearing a headscarf in her car.

The Islamic Republic has once again set out to push back Iranian women with the help of police forces, but many political analysts call this latest act a shot in the Islamic Republic’s own knee.

For the extremists, enforcing Islamic hijab is the last bastion before the regime's collapse

Tara [not her real name] is a political analyst in Iran. She has been arrested several times for her criticism of the Islamic Republic. She is also one of the Iranian women refusing to comply with the Islamic dress code imposed by the mollahs in Tehran. She explains why, just two months before the anniversary of Mahsa Amini’s death and amid an unprecedented crumbling of legitimacy for the regime, the Islamic Republic is adding fuel to the fire after decades of economic, environmental, political, diplomatic and human rights crises.

“As far as I can tell, there is a struggle between different political factions in Iran. There are extremists, including Ahmad-Reza Radan, Iran's newly appointed police chief, who want to reintroduce the morality police. They have the upper hand. But there are other blocs who, for whatever reason – maybe fear of more mass protests – disagree. Some hardline websites such as Tasnim News and Javan [two media outlets close to Iran’s powerful Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, the IRGC] have denied the morality police are being redeployed, saying the amateur images showing such patrols are 'fake'.

For the extremists, enforcing Islamic hijab on the streets is critical, the last bastion before the regime's collapse. It’s a way of showing that the regime is still in control. That is why the hardliners have recently organised rallies by their supporters to protest the regime's lack of initiative to enforce Sharia law in public spaces.

We should not forget that we are approaching the anniversary of Mahsa Amini's death. Maybe they think that with such a strong presence on the streets they can stop people from marking this day in the coming weeks. But I think that will backfire on them in the end.”

-2
submitted 1 year ago by TheFrirish@jlai.lu to c/android@lemdro.id

I guess this has been said before but I want to reiterate it here.

The 3 button navigation is simpler, much faster than gestures and less prone to input errors than gessure navigation.

It's easier to use the phone one handed when using 3 buttons especially considering the size of phones nowadays.

The only real downside to the 3 button bar is the space it takes away from the screen. I can't deny you get better immersion due increased screen size and gestures being intuitive (for me at least.

With that said I understand that depending on the brand the feel of gestures and their quality can vary (like between a pixel phone and a xiaomi device), but in terms of efficiency (and maybe slightly improved battery life due to less animations) and simplicity the 3 button navigation is still miles ahead.

4

Welcome guys,

I'm allowing myself to post this since I'm a contributer especially for the Philippines area. I hope more people will join us and we can have a healthy community.

view more: next ›

TheFrirish

joined 1 year ago