570
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] celsiustimeline@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 41 minutes ago
[-] badbytes@lemmy.world 2 points 33 minutes ago

God works in mysterious ways.

[-] cultsuperstar@lemmy.world 24 points 4 hours ago

Politicians make laws on the basis of "I'll never be in that situation". But then a son or daughter comes out as LGBTQ+ and all of a sudden laws need to change. A daughter has been raped and all of a sudden laws need to change. They don't make laws to help us. They make laws to control us and sweep away things they don't like.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 7 points 1 hour ago
[-] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 2 points 41 minutes ago

Where's the law to sweep him away?

[-] Thteven@lemmy.world 1 points 9 minutes ago

I'm sure there's plenty, the trick is getting someone to enforce them.

[-] tb_@lemmy.world 6 points 1 hour ago

A daughter has been raped and all of a sudden laws need to change.

Nah, they can afford to fly their daughters out.

[-] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 22 points 7 hours ago

You know what this reminds me of? There was some cheap ass webcomic in the very early 2000s that had an Amish protagonist. I only remember a single comic where the main character is watching TV and has some pundit say that poor and homeless should be shot. Then our Amish hero sets the pundit's house on fire rendering him homeless.

The pundit declares himself poor without his house and is promptly shot by his own followers because they made good his beliefs on shooting the poor and homeless. It was actually kinda funny.

But that being said, it amazes me just how often people forget the lessons of the past. The great depression seriously changed America's views on poverty being an entirely individual failing for many, many decades. Even into the Nixon administration he had to remind everyone that he was a New Dealer and wasn't going to roll back any of that shit. They had to wait until baby boomers, who did not grow up in the depression and were the ungrateful beneficiaries of the numerous programs in its wake, were the main voting block before beginning to roll that shit back.

It's also kinda incredible just how the libertarian and conservative propaganda apparatus really nullified most criticism of this shit. While that was always case even back in the 1930s, it was never to this extent.

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 8 points 7 hours ago

Remains me of when Spawn put the Leader of the KKK in Black face and they lynched him.

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 5 points 7 hours ago

The apocalypse makes fools of us all.

This is why I don't really like to punish people or hold grudges, what comes around tends to go around.

[-] ulkesh@lemmy.world 39 points 12 hours ago

That’s a shame. Thoughts and prayers.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 30 points 13 hours ago

ITT a whole lot of people talking shit while their local governments are doing the exact same thing. This is a map from 2015. It's only gotten worse since then.

If what's happening in Florida disgusts you then check your own laws first.

[-] Tedesche@lemmy.world 7 points 9 hours ago

It’s not a political thing, it’s an urban vs. rural thing. Cities tend to have more robust services for the homeless, so naturally homeless people wind up gravitating there.

They’ll find a way to suspend the law so it doesn’t affect victims of the hurricanes and then reinstitute them again later.

[-] crystalmerchant@lemmy.world 6 points 10 hours ago

"Banned sitting in public"??

[-] Tja@programming.dev 5 points 7 hours ago

"Loitering"

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 7 points 10 hours ago

I didn't see that one but I wouldn't be surprised. They keep coming up with inane stuff that only applies to those people.

[-] DrunkEngineer@lemmy.world 25 points 16 hours ago
[-] Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world 78 points 21 hours ago

Maybe running a political party off of hate wasn't such a good idea.

[-] skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de 39 points 14 hours ago

Not to ever be a Florida apologist in my entire life, but hating homeless people crosses party lines.

https://apnews.com/article/california-newsom-homeless-los-angeles-san-francisco-5b2b3aca9ca56efb444a717d278c1fd9

California dems jumped at taking away homeless camps. Not helping them, just destroying the camps. Claim victory, homeless move a few blocks over, or the next town over, without their stuff. It's like a South Park episode.

[-] Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world 1 points 26 minutes ago

I'm not saying that the democratic party is good on this front. I'm saying that the republican party, the ruling party of Florida is built on hate, and it's biting them in the ass.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] FanciestPants@lemmy.world 55 points 20 hours ago

This is why we need to ban hurricanes.

[-] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 15 points 14 hours ago

Nah, we gotta nuke the hurricanes.

[-] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 11 points 13 hours ago

It's a win-win. We destroy the hurricanes, and we also reduce our nuclear stockpile. I can see no flaws in this proposal. Checkmate, peaceniks!

[-] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 2 points 55 minutes ago

What if to stop the hurricanes, we put our nuclear stockpile underneath a steam engine.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2024
570 points (99.5% liked)

News

23105 readers
3350 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS