Are you using a third-party client? I don't see this feature on the default Lemmy web interface.
It's fine for patrols, but it wouldn't accomplish much in an actual conflict. They carry a few Kinzhals and otherwise only a few torpedoes AFAIK. Compared to the German """Frigates""" and RN frigates carrying Harpoons and more, it isn't a strong match-up. The USN also tends to have at least one amphibious assault ship in the Baltic at any given time.
I guess you did nazi the joke I was trying to make.
I think for this administration we should refer to them not as the "czar" of something, but rather the "hauptamptleiter".
I'm not saying this is Russia's fault -- I'm pointing out that this exhaustion is a longtime goal of propaganda.
Amusingly, the Baltic fleet doesn't have anything larger than a frigate.
This is by design. As cited here: https://jordanrussiacenter.org/blog/propaganda-political-apathy-and-authoritarianism-in-russia
Russian propaganda derives its effectiveness from political apathy rather than its ability to persuade. Because citizens understand that their actions cannot affect the autocrat’s policies, they invest only minimal resources in acquiring political information or thinking about politics at all. This state of affairs, in turn, leads to a very superficial processing of information. Citizens use narratives imposed by the Kremlin as frameworks for interpreting political events, but do not incorporate them fully and do not formulate consistent political opinions. In other words, propaganda works because citizens are not interested enough in politics to form consistent opinions to challenge—or support—authoritarian rule.
And it isn't new either. From 1922: https://www.jstor.org/stable/6376?seq=2
Consequently to-day the average citizen confesses he really does not know what the facts are in this and many other important issues. He has been deluged with facts, near-facts and falsifications put forth by interested parties, so that he has a mass of undigested and conflicting ideas on these subjects, or else has become frankly partisan to one view.
Social housing would fix this. End of story.
Same. It seems weird not to mention that in the article, since it`s a very popular use case for them.
I'm not sure what Honda gains from this other than production capacity. I suppose that depends on how closely merged the companies will be -- they may only share platforms rather than go full badge engineering.
Why are these tankers not subject to sanctions if their ownership is so well-known that Lloyd's can report on it with absolute certainty?