Merely using the word mm"premise" correctly makes one sound 200+ IQ in 2025.

Can we get these graphs for duckduckgo superimposed on this one?

You might want to stay away from higher maths and all discussions around it, like this one.

That trivial point is not the one we (you and me) are contending.

The issue is that OP hasn't actually defined the sequence, just given some properties (which does not lead to any definition or determination of the location of the number/s on the number line, by itself). Assuming that he has defined it, doesn't change anything as any other commentator can assume something different, which consistent with OP's post.

Obviously. But still maths avoids stuff like "I assume the answer is X. QED."

assumption ≠ definition

Not money per se, I believe more hands are necesary to assist/succeed Werner Koch. He is doing a critical task for the internet, and last I read, he is the only one on it.

0.101001000100001000001 . . .

Might very well be :

0.101001000100001000001202002000200002000002 ...

Real life, is different from gamified questions asked in student exams.

Defined where ?

Using "≈" and "≠" sign on internet text.
These are literally long press options on the "=" key.

The life I live is not aligned with my principles.

odf/odt/ods

.md

SimpleX

Matrix

OpenPGP

Last, certainly not least... ActivityPub