140
submitted 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) by Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

How about ANY FINITE SEQUENCE AT ALL?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] SwordInStone@lemmy.world 54 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

No, the fact that a number is infinite and non-repeating doesn't mean that and since in order to disprove something you need only one example here it is: 0.1101001000100001000001... this is a number that goes 1 and then x times 0 with x incrementing. It is infinite and non-repeating, yet doesn't contain a single 2.

[-] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 hours ago

This proves that an infinite, non-repeating number needn't contain any given finite numeric sequence, but it doesn't prove that an infinite, non-repeating number can't. This is not to say that Pi does contain all finite numeric sequences, just that this statement isn't sufficient to prove it can't.

[-] AccountMaker@slrpnk.net 8 points 5 hours ago

That was quite an elegant proof

[-] Thavron@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 hours ago

Doesn't the sequence "01" repeat? Or am I misunderstanding the term.

[-] Sconrad122@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

A nonrepeating number does not mean that a sequence within that number never happens again, it means that the there is no point in the number where you can predict the numbers to follow by playing back a subset of the numbers before that point on repeat. So for 01 to be the "repeating pattern", the rest of the number at some point would have to be 010101010101010101... You can find the sequence "14" at digits 2 and 3, 104 and 105, 251 and 252, and 296 and 297 (I'm sure more places as well).

[-] SwordInStone@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

yeah, but non-repeating in terms of decimal numbers usually mean: you cannot write it as 0.(abc), which would mean 0.abcabcabcabc...

[-] lazynooblet@lazysoci.al 6 points 6 hours ago

What about in the context of Pi?

[-] Azzu@lemm.ee 1 points 6 hours ago

But didn't you just give a counterexample with an infinite number? OP only said something about finite numbers.

[-] Strobelt@lemmy.world 14 points 6 hours ago

They were showing that another Infinite repeating sequence 0.1010010001... is infinite and repeating (like pi) but doesn't contain all finite numbers

[-] Azzu@lemm.ee 2 points 3 hours ago

You mean infinite and non- repeating?

[-] SwordInStone@lemmy.world 8 points 5 hours ago

"2" is a finite sequence that doesn't exist in the example number

[-] wheresmysurplusvalue@hexbear.net 4 points 5 hours ago

https://github.com/philipl/pifs

πfs is a revolutionary new file system that, instead of wasting space storing your data on your hard drive, stores your data in π! You'll never run out of space again - π holds every file that could possibly exist! They said 100% compression was impossible? You're looking at it!

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 3 hours ago

https://github.com/philipl/pifs

I enjoyed this linked text:

If you compute it, you will be guilty of:

  • Copyright infringement (of all books, all short stories, all newspapers, all magazines, all web sites, all music, all movies, and all software, including the complete Windows source code)
  • Trademark infringement
  • Possession of child pornography
  • Espionage (unauthorized possession of top secret information)
  • Possession of DVD-cracking software
  • Possession of threats to the President
  • Possession of everyone's SSN, everyone's credit card numbers, everyone's PIN numbers, everyone's unlisted phone numbers, and everyone's passwords
  • Defaming Islam. Not technically illegal, but you'll have to go into hiding along with Salman Rushdie.
  • Defaming Scientology. Which IS illegal--just ask Keith Henson.
[-] AnnaFrankfurter@lemmy.ml 10 points 8 hours ago

Not just any all finite number sequence appear in pi

[-] ped_xing@hexbear.net 19 points 11 hours ago

0.101001000100001000001 . . .

speech-r I'm infinite and non-repeating. Can you find a 2 in me?

[-] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 4 points 7 hours ago

Are you trying to say the answer to their question is no? Because if so, you're wrong, and if not I'm not sure what you're trying to say.

[-] ped_xing@hexbear.net 2 points 5 hours ago

The conclusion does not follow from the premises, as evidenced by my counterexample. It could be the case that every finite string of digits appears in the decimal expansion of pi, but if that's the case, a proof would have to involve more properties than an infinite non-repeating decimal expansion. I would like to see your proof that every finite string of digits appears in the decimal expansion of pi.

[-] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 0 points 5 hours ago

Well that's just being pointlessly pedantic, obviously they fucking know that a repeating number of all zeros and ones doesn't have a two in it. This is pure reddit pedantry you're doing

[-] ExFed@lemm.ee 0 points 4 hours ago
[-] ProfessorOwl_PhD@hexbear.net 1 points 6 hours ago

Are you Pi?

[-] flashgnash@lemm.ee 5 points 9 hours ago

You can't prove that there isn't one somewhere

[-] Danitos@reddthat.com 6 points 8 hours ago

You can, it's literally the way the number is defined.

[-] mukt@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 hours ago
[-] cosecantphi@hexbear.net 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

It's implicitly defined here by its decimal form:

0.101001000100001000001 . . .

The definition of this number is that the number of 0s after each 1 is given by the total previous number of 1s in the sequence. That's why it can't contain 2 despite being infinite and non-repeating.

[-] xigoi@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 9 hours ago
[-] flashgnash@lemm.ee 1 points 5 hours ago

Because you'd need to search through an infinite number of digits (unless you have access to the original formula)

[-] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 63 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

A number for which that is true is called a normal number. It’s proven that almost all real numbers are normal, but it’s very difficult to prove that any particular number is normal. It hasn’t yet been proved that π is normal, though it’s generally assumed to be.

[-] prime_number_314159@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

I love the idea (and it's definitely true) that there are irrational numbers which, when written in a suitable base, contain the sequence of characters, "This number is provably normal" and are simultaneously not normal.

[-] lily33@lemm.ee 125 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

It's almost sure to be the case, but nobody has managed to prove it yet.

Simply being infinite and non-repeating doesn't guarantee that all finite sequences will appear. For example, you could have an infinite non-repeating number that doesn't have any 9s in it. But, as far as numbers go, exceptions like that are very rare, and in almost all (infinite, non-repeating) numbers you'll have all finite sequences appearing.

[-] orcrist@lemm.ee 2 points 6 hours ago

Exceptions are infinite. Is that rare?

[-] ProfessorScience@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

Rare in this context is a question of density. There are infinitely many integers within the real numbers, for example, but there are far more non-integers than integers. So integers are more rare within the real.

[-] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 3 points 7 hours ago

Very rare in the sense that they have a probability of 0.

[-] cynar@lemmy.world 5 points 7 hours ago

There are lot that fit that pattern. However, most/all naturally used irrational numbers seem to be normal. Maths has, however had enough things that seemed 'obvious' which turned out to be false later. Just because it's obvious doesn't mean it's mathematically true.

[-] LodeMike@lemmy.today 5 points 10 hours ago
[-] weker01@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Can you prove this? Or link a proof?

[-] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 55 points 16 hours ago

The jury is out on whether every finite sequence of digits is contained in pi.

However, there are a multitude of real numbers that contain every finite sequence of digits when written in base 10. Here's one, which is defined by concatenating the digits of every non-negative integer in increasing order. It looks like this:

0 . 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ...
[-] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 10 points 13 hours ago

Yes.

And if you're thinking of a compression algorithm, nope, pigeonhole principle.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 26 Dec 2024
140 points (99.3% liked)

Asklemmy

44157 readers
1317 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS