265
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] giantofthenorth@lemm.ee 84 points 1 year ago

Love that most of the world's governments came together and said "collective punishment is bad, we should make it illegal during times of war" and shit like this can still fly within any first world country.

[-] hydrospanner@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

This sort of collective treatment seems awful "communist" for a system that claims to hate it so much.

Almost like they're okay with it when it means forcing their will and their hardship onto a group that is powerless to resist...

[-] FunkyMonk@kbin.social 82 points 1 year ago

Yahuh... now do one for police unions.

[-] superduperenigma@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago

Police should have to carry professional insurance just like doctors carry malpractice insurance.

Change my mind.

[-] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 13 points 1 year ago

I don't think it will work at all. I think it would make the problem much worse, not better.

Think about that for a second: Police are never convicted, and rarely officially sanctioned. They always get away with it. Insurance will never pay out, so the cost of insuring officers will be next to nothing.

But, now we have an insurer with a vested interest in clearing the officer of wrongdoing, lest they be forced to pay a claim.

[-] Stern@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

We have a insurer with a vested interest in ensuring the officer doesn't fuck up in the first place. Insurers don't want claims at all, because whether they win or lose thats still money being spent, albeit more in the latter case.

Rates would go up due to the numerous claims against Officer McShooty (even if defended) and he wouldn't be able to afford it. He goes to another department? If they have insurance he's still in the system so...

[-] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 1 points 1 year ago

I think what would actually happen is the the insurer would demand Officer McShooty sue these claimants for harassment, defamation of character, and receive the bulk of any awarded damages.

The overwhelming majority of absurd lawsuits, (like where an aunt sues her nephew for hugging her too hard) aren't brought by the named plaintiff, but by the plaintiff's insurer. The aunt isn't actually suing the nephew. The aunt's medical insurance sues the nephew's homeowner's or liability insurance.

I saw a video awhile back that presented a related argument. If everyone had life insurance, and those life insurance companies were all prepared to sue on our behalf, we would never have another wrongful death at the hands of a cop. Our insurers would sue the everyloving fuck out of the department to avoid being stuck with that bill. Facing formidable legal repercussions, police departments would finally have an incentive to clean house.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz 59 points 1 year ago

Or they could just find the vandal with the security cameras they no doubt installed in every single hallway to protect themselves against their own customers should they have to go to court 🤷

Oh wait, I forgot, we're trapped in tyranny.

[-] ShittyRedditWasBetter@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

I've been to several schools with zero cameras in residential buildings. I do not think they are as common as you think.

[-] skyspydude1@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Hell, my school basically only had cameras in a few very specific areas inside any of the buildings on campus. The only ones I was aware of in our departmental building were, understandably, keeping an eye on the doorway into the explosives labs.

[-] PlantDadManGuy@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

But that would require actual work and investigation! Why would they bother when they can just add on another $100 to everybody's rent bill for "repairs"

[-] Lycerius@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago

The HRE ain't gonna do shit since it hasn't existed since 1806.

[-] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 year ago

Voltaire would argue that even then it didn't

[-] Lycerius@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

😆 And he'd be right for all intents and purposes!

[-] Bootheal0179@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago

This happened to me in college. The dorms were “locked” over the holidays and student residents were not allowed to even access the dorm building, when we returned back to school after new year’s, the hallway and apartment doors had been vandalized. The university passed the bill on to each of the residents of the building, even without any way we could have stopped it, since campus police would’ve arrested anyone found attempting to get into our dorms.

[-] CoderKat@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago

Happened to me, too. Some unknown people caused damage to a common room and they billed everyone in the building. I tried to email about it, but they didn't budge. I felt I had to pay it because the university threatens to withhold transcripts and stuff if you have outstanding fines.

[-] Bootheal0179@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Exactly what they did to me. I fought them on it. It was basically a shakedown racket and to get my diploma I decided it was better to pay and hold a grudge and have it written on my tombstone for posterity.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] JackbyDev@programming.dev 26 points 1 year ago

How do they know it is done by someone within that community and not some random person?

[-] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 year ago

My solution would be this:

Have a running total for damages caused by vandals and call it a “Vandalism Lottery”. When someone is caught vandalizing in the community, they win the lottery, but instead of getting money, they pay whatever that lottery amount is up to. $700,000? To bad! Work the rest of your life to pay it off.

And to keep it fair, the starting amount should be no less than $20,000.

On top of that, they should be required to clean up any identified vandalism for at least the next year.

It should NEVER be at the loss of residents, students, or taxpayers to recoup damage caused by idiots.

And yes, I'm salty because vandals caused over $50,000 to a brand-new waterfront park we had open this past year, and the Vandalism Lottery would have been a wonderful prize to the jackasses who got caught!

[-] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 1 year ago

Even this I disagree with. It sounds like a good idea until the total cost is substantial, and they don’t want to foot the bill. So they watch for someone who does anything that can be misconstrued as vandalism and force them to foot the bill.

Not to mention, fining someone for $100 in damage nearly a million is honestly more unethical than the vandalism.

There’s a reason we don’t do this type of thing in the legal world, it’s easily taken advantage of, and unethical as fuck.

[-] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

So they watch for someone who does anything that can be misconstrued as vandalism

Vandalism serious enough to be brought to court would be enough to win the lottery. If it's something petty, like doodling on a park bench with a pencil, then they don't win, but they should still do XX months of community cleanup.

As an alternative to the lottery, how about we charge the scumbags 2x the actual cost to repair the damage they caused. And 1 year community cleanup as a sign of goodwill.

Either way, the cost to society far outweighs the current cost of committing these crimes. Flip it around and see what happens.

[-] cozycosmic@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Are you proposing that doodling on a bench with pencil should warrant months of community service?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 year ago

How do you think it works in condo buildings and residential co-ops?

[-] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 47 points 1 year ago

They generally try to find a responsible party and bill them, file an insurance claim, use the general maintenance budget, and special assessments as a last resort.

[-] harmonea@kbin.social 21 points 1 year ago

This. They should be going through insurance for this.

Of course, the insurance rates would rise, and they'd still be passing on that increase to the residents, but residents would be slightly less bitchy about it since the extra layers of opacity would make it seem like "just more of the usual greed and inflation."

[-] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

Insurance is only needed if things get really bad. What should happen is just having like 2 weeks of janitor time dedicated to powewashing graffiti in their annual budget.

[-] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Or in the wider world with public infrastructure and taxpayers

[-] wieson@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Mask out the vandalised area and put up a posting "free space available for graffiti art, email your sketch to blabla to get it approved "

[-] Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago

The problem with this is it takes a while to normalize and self regulate. It demonstrably works, but it takes a long time for the dickheads and edgelords to stop making poorly drawn swastikas every day. Longer than any institution is willing to commit to anything.

[-] jayrhacker@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago

Approximately 30 days before students are charged, a notice will be sent to community members in an effort to identify the responsible individual(s) for additional investigation.

Ah, so if you don't rat out the vandals, you have to pay

[-] FuntyMcCraiger@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago

Weird that you wouldn't snitch on the dude who smears poop on the walls.

I'd like to think everyone would give you a pass for that.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Yeah I have a feeling this is more about paint on walls and that kind of thing. The phantom shitter has no friends.

[-] sadreality@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

That assumes you know who did lol

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

What a great way to ensure you'll never get donations from some specific alumni

[-] uis@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago
[-] Koppensneller@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Holy Roman Empire.

[-] Tenbot@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

The Holy Roman Empire.

[-] Duplodicus@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago
[-] Malfeasant@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago
[-] peereboominc@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

Just send them all the bills you have because "this acacemic year, you are implementing a You Pay For Me Policy".

[-] Quik@infosec.pub 4 points 1 year ago

In fact, you could right away send them bills for every incident you don’t exactly know that they didn't cause it…

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2023
265 points (95.8% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

35759 readers
923 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-At this time we permit content that is infuriating until an infuriating community is made available.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS