214
Broadcom lays off VMware employees after closing its $69 billion acquisition of the company (www.businessinsider.com)
submitted 1 year ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
19 comments fedilink hide all child comments
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] lemann@lemmy.one 67 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Well, sounds like VMWare is dead now then.

Hope those new ex-C suite billionaires enjoy the damage they've done to a previously reputable brand and product 🤷‍♂️ glad I went with libvirt for virtualization instead 4 years ago when rebuilding my homelab

Edit: fix virtualization spelling error

[-] canis_majoris@lemmy.ca 56 points 1 year ago

VMware has been dying because of the Broadcom acquisition since last year. They basically looked at all the fortune 500s that used the tech and said "hey guys, our new business plan is to jack up the price 500% because your stack is dependent on us" and ever since there's been a ton of positions for migration to cloud services and OpenStack.

[-] Wahots@pawb.social 6 points 1 year ago

Companies shouldn't be going all in on one piece of software anyways. Mine is going to all Azure, and I can see the pain train coming from miles away when they decide to jack up pricing or tank service. Kind of surprised to see so many companies putting all their eggs into one basket.

[-] CameronDev@programming.dev 23 points 1 year ago

Its most likely the non-technical employees being laid off. The accountants, lawyers and sales. Broadcom already has those departments, they dont need duplicates. The developers will probably stay though. i'm sure vmware products will continue to be just as unreliable as they have always been...

Its kinda suprising how bad virtualisation front end software is. I use libvirt at home as well, virt-manager locks up and crashes frequently, and throws obscure errors if i get the config wrong.
VMware workstation at work will crash weekly, taking down the entire host machine. Esxi/vcenter also seems to require constant admin to keep it alive, and even still requires a lot of downtime.

[-] ShunkW@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Years ago, I had a job where we were moving from Citrix to esxi. I was so excited because I had bought into the hype and Citrix had annoyed me to no end. 4 months into the migration project, we hit a major roadblock. Open a ticket - no response. Reach out to our contact for escalation after a week - no response. Our director reached out to the high level person on the VMware side of the deal - no response.

At least with Citrix we usually got a response within 24 hours with information or being told they were escalating. We stuck with Citrix because our director at least didn't fall into the sunk cost fallacy.

[-] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago

Esxi/vcenter also seems to require constant admin

It's weird how I've worked in Large-scale Enterprise shops for more than the last decade, and ESX since about 4 has required absolutely no break-fix other than patching and whatever the underlying hardware needed. We're talking thousands of VMs, and flawless metro-vmotion of hundreds of hot-and-running streaming VMs at times, and over years. To see what you've written, it could be a very different product from the one I've used, as I've seen none of what you mention.

I hope you can see the same reliability one day, from the product where you've migrated.

[-] CameronDev@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

I dont do the admin side of it, but as a user we see frequent outages (had one today :( ). I hope to one day I see the same reliability youve experienced :(

[-] themoonisacheese@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

My experience as well. Yes there are problems sometimes but across 1k+ hypervisors that's going to happen.

[-] plz1@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Disagree on vCenter/ESXi. Having a competent design, build, and initial deployment are usually the success factors. I've had ESXi hosts and vCenter that only need to go offline for mandatory security patching, and even then, it's easily covered by vMotion.

Agree that VMware Workstation is awful.

[-] CameronDev@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

I had nothing to do with the design and build, or current management. It could well be that my experience is unique. But its not been positive unfortunately. :(

[-] Veedem@lemmy.world 55 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Man, a guy I know who has worked for and evangelized VMWare for years and he’s been oddly quiet on Mastodon today. Guess it’s time to reach out.

Update: His job is safe.

[-] reddig33@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Yes, that’s what always happens after a merger. Not sure why everyone is acting so shocked.

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 10 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:

Many VMware employees learned Monday that their positions will be eliminated following Broadcom closing its acquisition of the company.

Employees whose positions were eliminated received an email on Monday viewed by Business Insider that said, "Broadcom recently completed its acquisition of VMware.

As part of integration planning, and following an organizational needs assessment, we identified go-forward roles that will be required within the combined company.

We want to make this transition as smooth as possible, including offering you a generous severance package and providing you a non-working paid notice period," the email continued.

VMware had already begun job cuts prior to the acquisition closing, BI previously reported.

In the past year, several top VMware executives have left the cloud computing company.

The original article contains 333 words, the summary contains 121 words. Saved 64%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] Kid_Thunder@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

Non-paywall/Nagwall/Whatever that stupid thing was Archive.org link.

[-] redditReallySucks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago

The price is nice but I don't get why they don't round it. Same with activision acquisition.

[-] dmalteseknight@programming.dev 32 points 1 year ago

Well the difference between 69 billion and 70 billion is 1 billion.

[-] ChapulinColorado@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Tom Scott’s video on 1 million dollars vs 1 billion dollars highlights how crazy 1 billion dollars really is for those that need easy to understand comparisons like me.

https://youtu.be/8YUWDrLazCg?si=EVLrBrWSVYptf3r8

[-] andrew@lemmy.stuart.fun 6 points 1 year ago

Damn, this must be why I'm not a billionaire. I keep forgetting to do this.

[-] iamanurd@midwest.social 12 points 1 year ago

I can believe that they didn’t add 420 million to it…

this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2023
214 points (98.2% liked)

Technology

60123 readers
3648 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world