395
all 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] dhork@lemmy.world 165 points 10 months ago

What this actually proves is that Hunter Biden made good on a loan from his father, and kept track of these repayments on an actual spreadsheet.

No wonder Republicans are so upset, this might establish a precedent that people ought to repay loans, and not just leave others on the hook for them

[-] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 30 points 10 months ago

That’s what they already think. See student loans and Biden.

[-] spaceghoti@lemmy.one 40 points 10 months ago

And here I thought they were for predatory loans driving people into bankruptcy but not allowing them to offload the debt unless it's a corporation.

See Biden and student loan forgiveness.

[-] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Yes. As I said to someone else, it’s all hypocritical. The republicans only care about how they serve themselves and the narrative will always be whatever helps them get what they covet.

[-] spaceghoti@lemmy.one 2 points 10 months ago

And you think it's hypocritical that Democrats are trying to do something to help Americans struggling with student loans? Your logic is not clear.

[-] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I literally did not say that at all. I was commenting on the republican side of things.

I personally think it’s fine, and owed, to give student loan debt relief. That is not full wipe outs for everyone, it’s a helpful token that helps everyone. Businesses and wealthy always get the kickbacks but struggling people get one little bone and others throw a hissy fit.

[-] meco03211@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago

Which paradoxically differs from how they view PPP loans. Or is it hypocritically?

[-] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

It’s all hypocritical. They just want to get theirs and fuck everyone else. Whatever form that takes, well, they support it.

[-] sndmn@lemmy.ca 3 points 10 months ago

Student loans are, by definition, for education and education prevents conservatives.

[-] TechyDad@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Clearly, the Republicans must impeach Biden now. Do you know how much this could hurt Trump if "people have to pay back their debts" catches on?!!!

[-] rayyy@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago

Clarence Thomas is whistling as he passes by.

[-] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 11 points 10 months ago

Brett Kavanaugh is sobbing as he passes by.

[-] ggppjj@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

Calendar clutched, alcohol soaking into his anus.

[-] HubertManne@kbin.social 4 points 10 months ago

Not quite. Tehy want people to mostly repay loans, but clearly not rich people!!!

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 57 points 10 months ago

So... wait... if Hunter was so low on cash that his dad was having to cover his car loan, and Hunter repaid back that money... then doesn't that mean he WASN'T getting millions and millions from China?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 38 points 10 months ago

You're expecting this to be rational.

[-] ashok36@lemmy.world 52 points 10 months ago

So Hunter paid Joe about $4100 over three months when neither of them were government employees or office holders.

Next they'll bring out evidence Joe paid for hunter's orthodontics in 82 and that proves they've been in cohoots the whole time.

[-] DoomBot5@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago

No way, these people are exchanging gifts like they're family or something. What has this world become?

[-] theterrasque@infosec.pub 4 points 10 months ago

What, giving gifts to family instead of stealing from them?!?

#NotMyPresident

[-] franklin@lemmy.world 51 points 10 months ago

You mean to say their blatant attempt to finger point and shift focus away from their party's misdeeds turned out to be nothing?

Shocked.

[-] agitatedpotato@lemmy.world 50 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Let's be fair, I can see how Republicans would find it unusual or strange to pay back a debt.

[-] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 6 points 10 months ago

Or that an exchange of money can be done without needing to cover something up

[-] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 47 points 10 months ago

how much time and money have been wasted on this effort lead by conservatives?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 33 points 10 months ago

It's not wasted if it gets their constituents to vote for them.

[-] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 32 points 10 months ago

Don’t call them conservative, they don’t conserve fucking shit.

[-] Frog-Brawler@kbin.social 7 points 10 months ago

I like to refer to them as Republicunts, but I switch it to Republicants when I want to be polite.

[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 14 points 10 months ago

I call them Regressives. They're trying to speedrun back to the Dark Ages.

[-] agent_flounder@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Extremist Reactionaries or Regressives works for me.

[-] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 3 points 10 months ago

terrorists and saboteurs seem to fit more and more with each passing day

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

More of both than it would take to keep medicare, medicaid and social security solvent in perpetuity.

[-] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 4 points 10 months ago

universal healthcare would be cheaper than what we pay now.

but both conservatives and democrats dont want universal healthcare.. now go figure out why

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

I WAS actually going to say "more than the transition to universal single payer healthcare would cost, after which it would be cheaper than the current system of paying trillions to private insurers for denying as much care as they possibly can", but I could come up with a concise with better punctuation way of saying it 😁

[-] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

i like to put it this way and have people try and make it not sound terrible:

health insurance profits only come at the expense of human suffering.

repeat it. shout it. because its the truth no one wants to say out loud.

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

Haven't gotten to use this one in a while

[-] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 27 points 10 months ago

I'm not a fan of Biden. I held my nose when voting for him. But if all these investigations can't turn up ONE thing besides for Hunter's huge cock then the Biden's are way less corrupt then I thought. That's a pleasant surprise!

[-] rmuk@feddit.uk 11 points 10 months ago

How huge are we talking? Asking for a me.

[-] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 17 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Big enough that MTG, known swinger, entered pictures of it into the Congressional record. Shes got her eyes on that dick.

[-] RunningInRVA@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

So what exactly made you think he was corrupt to begin with?

[-] Pratai@lemmy.ca 18 points 10 months ago

Everything they do is a fucking joke.

[-] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago

Worthless fucking degenerates.

[-] dynamojoe@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago

It's disappointing how the selective omission of information can make something innocuous seem so damning.

[-] JustZ@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Hunter Biden's whole life was turned inside and out in 2014 when he joined the board of Burisma. The Republicans tried to make it a scandal then but he was cleared of any wrongdoing or nepotism by the Office of Government Ethics in 2014. I literally cannot even find those stories anymore because of how the media resurrected the story and saturated the public record to create a fake scandal. Like yeah, he probably got the job because of his last name, but the only reason Burisma wanted his last name is because this was a company dedicated to the sole goal of getting Ukraine off of dependence on Russian oil and for that it needed credibility in the West, who cares about that?

[-] Redfungi@lemmings.world 4 points 10 months ago

I want to comment on that website. Did it just back load 3 or 4 more articles i had to back out of to leave the site? thats fucking new... It used those weird blue bars to hide the loading i think?

this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2023
395 points (98.3% liked)

politics

19008 readers
3468 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS