413
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Maddie@sh.itjust.works 228 points 1 year ago

This leaky headed geriatric piece of shit can go fuck himself

[-] Tremble@sh.itjust.works 35 points 1 year ago

Obama was mediocre but refreshing because he was actually present in many ways

[-] GladiusB@lemmy.world 61 points 1 year ago

I don't know if I would consider him mediocre. His policies may not have been the greatest. However the nation's esteem while he was in office was unparalleled. There are always blind spots, but he was well spoken and inspiring. No President or most of Congress has even come close in the past 30 years.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] kaffiene@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago

As a non American I thought he was better than most you've had since, maybe Carter

[-] PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah, Obama was really popular on the international stage. But domestically, he was milquetoast at best. Still better than Biden by miles, but he was 100% a centrist who ran as a liberal. Hell, on the international stage, he was considered conservative. Because the USA’s political spectrum had always leaned pretty far right, so a moderate conservative seems liberal by comparison.

The issue is that the republicans adopted a party policy of “we don’t care what it is. If Obama wants it, we’ll oppose it.” Not because they were against whatever Obama’s policy was, but because they had spent so long vilifying him to their voter base. It was suddenly political suicide for a Republican to agree with Obama. After all, they had been telling their voters that Obama was a Muslim, a terrorist, a satanist, a communist, a socialist, unamerican, coming for your guns, and any other insults they could think up.

So when Obama won the election, they suddenly had to vehemently oppose a man who was… Slightly right of center? This meant the pendulum had to swing way past the moderate right and landed squarely in fascist territory.

If Obama had actually been any of the things they accused him of, they probably would’ve been more moderate when opposing him. But since he was a centrist, they suddenly had to pander to the racists, the misogynists, the xenophobes. Those groups had always been conservative… But Obama was the first time in a long time that conservatives started saying the quiet part out loud, and pandering directly to those groups.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Diplomjodler@feddit.de 21 points 1 year ago

Never ceases to amaze me how US politics is so full of incoherently babbling clowns.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Reddfugee42@lemmy.world 194 points 1 year ago

"Things were fine before minorities started being able to express themselves without pushback." - old white guys

[-] taggart_mccallister@lemm.ee 83 points 1 year ago

Exactly. When people say Obama hurt race relations it's because those white people hated seeing black people succeeding where only whites could, triggering them into hating them more.

[-] vitamin@infosec.pub 140 points 1 year ago

What he meant to say was that Republicans would have continued to pretend to not be racist and stuck to their wink wink dog whistles, but electing a black man president drove them so insane that they regressed 50 years and returned to being openly racist.

[-] LordOfTheChia@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

drove them so insane

This Onion story/video from right after Obama's ~~2016~~ 2012 win is very relevant and oddly prescient:

https://youtu.be/jjonGtrCyVE

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] spider@lemmy.nz 105 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Electing ~~Obama~~ Trump has 'taken us back 40 or 50 years on race relations'

fixed that for ya, Rudy

[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 39 points 1 year ago

Like, this is the laziest attempt at projecting I've seen in a while. It's like watching someone become more bigoted as their facilities deteriorate from dementia, and it's just sad to watch.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Rakonat@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 97 points 1 year ago

That's a funny way to say you hate black people, Rudy.

[-] Naja_Kaouthia@lemmy.world 96 points 1 year ago

What in the demented word salad hell did I just read?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] eran_morad@lemmy.world 91 points 1 year ago

These cunts really lost their shit when we elected a black guy.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 70 points 1 year ago

Yeah, because all those tiki torch marches happened under Obama? Hmmm... good people on both sides? Well all the Black Lives Matters protests... no? Not Obama either?

[-] jonne@infosec.pub 50 points 1 year ago

See, if you just hadn't scared those white people by electing a black president, things would've been so much better!

[-] schema@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago

It's basic abuser mentality. "Because a black person has dared to become president, you forced us to be more racist and divisive."

[-] sndmn@lemmy.ca 68 points 1 year ago

Does he think Obama is still the president?

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] hperrin@lemmy.world 62 points 1 year ago

I think it’s time we send Rudy to live on a farm upstate.

[-] TacoNissan@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

I live upstate and we don't want him up here

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 58 points 1 year ago
[-] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 46 points 1 year ago

Thats not fair. Theres more to conservatism than Racism.

Theres also the misogyny, and xenophobia, hatred for the lower classes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works 58 points 1 year ago

Even from a right/conservative view of things this makes no sense. Obama was a fucking legal scholar. He'd learned CRT in the context of law and brought it to bear not at all in a social context.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ook_the_librarian@lemmy.world 49 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Maybe it took Guiliani back 40 years. He was at about 1920 before but he seems closer to 1880 now.

[-] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 47 points 1 year ago

Can he fall down an escalator already? Fucksake.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] FrankTheHealer@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago

This feels like an onion article

[-] Rapidcreek@reddthat.com 40 points 1 year ago

He's as much a history buff as a computer security expert

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago

Yeah, because all the creepy weirdos on the right absolutely FREAKED OUT that a "Kenyan usurper" was selected by We, The People to run the country.

Remember how ecstatic all these freaks were when OJ won just the EC? The memes of showing how OJ - King of the Birthers - was eclipsing Obama?

I'm sure none of those feelz from the right had anything to do with racism.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] mriguy@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago

“We would have all stayed under our rocks if YOU hadn’t forced us to freak out by electing a black guy”.

[-] athos77@kbin.social 31 points 1 year ago

The right-wing reactionary response to Obama's election set race relations back.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] joel_feila@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago

So his racisism is Obama's fault.

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] frezik@midwest.social 25 points 1 year ago

Why does Rudy think he has an opinion worth listening to on this matter?

Or anything else, really.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 22 points 1 year ago

Hey Rawstory, less reporting on what they say, more reporting on what they did, thanks.

[-] BeautifulMind@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

Translation: when we elected Obama it upset the racists so badly they had a great big meltdown about it

[-] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

Wait...it was just about ten years ago that they were saying racism was over because we had a Black president. Make up your mind, Rudolph.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2023
413 points (90.9% liked)

politics

19246 readers
2813 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS