487

Figure skater Valieva disqualified in Olympic doping case. Russians set to lose team gold to US (apnews.com)

submitted 11 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

90 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Russian figure skater Kamila Valieva was disqualified from the 2022 Olympics on Monday, almost two years after her doping case caused turmoil at the Beijing Games.

The verdict from the Court of Arbitration for Sport means the Russians are set to be stripped of the gold medal in figure skating’s team event. The United States finished second and is set to be named Olympic champion instead.

The International Olympic Committee decided not to present any medals for the event in Beijing, where the 15-year-old Valieva was the star performer hours before her positive test for a banned heart medicine was revealed.

CAS said it upheld appeals led by the World Anti-Doping Agency, which asked the court to disqualify Valieva from the Olympics and ban her. A Russian sports tribunal had cleared her of any blame.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] rikudou@lemmings.world 125 points 11 months ago

Russians and doping, name a more iconic duo.

[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 130 points 11 months ago

Russians and killing political opponents

[-] snausagesinablanket@lemmy.world 31 points 11 months ago

Russians and faulty windows.

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] rikudou@lemmings.world 27 points 11 months ago

Touché.

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] kyle@lemm.ee 8 points 11 months ago

Russians and killing their own citizens

[-] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago

Russians and a lack of ethical morality.

[-] PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works 121 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Man I feel bad for her. She was only 15 and probably didn’t have much of a say in the matter. It’s the right call, but still, I do feel for her.

[-] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 49 points 11 months ago

Imagine if she coulda won without potentially risking her health with drugs, too.

[-] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 55 points 11 months ago

She probably had no choice in the matter and trusted her coach and medical team to do the right thing.

Kids in the Olympics is a double edged sword.

[-] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 15 points 11 months ago

Indeed. Shoulda said something like:

Right. Imagine too if she could’ve won even without the drugs she was supplied (by those who may have paid little mind to their potential long-term health impacts on her).

[-] circuscritic@lemmy.ca 48 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

This reminds me of when Trump called a race horse a junkie after winning the Kentucky Derby and being disqualified for a failed drug test. As if the horse was tying off and shooting up in the stable outhouse.

While this child has more agency than a horse, it's not like she had a choice in the matter.

Is it right for her for be DQ'd? Yes, but she's still a victim.

Don't lose sight of the fact that she's was a child made to take drugs by her own government.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

This reminds me of when Trump called a race horse a junkie after winning the Kentucky Derby and being disqualified for a failed drug test.

Wait...

Trump literally compared himself to a racehorse yesterday to show how he has good genes (because his uncle was an MIT professor and apparently the brother of a winning racehorse is just as good as a winning racehorse).

[-] circuscritic@lemmy.ca 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

So now even our Kentucky Derby winner, Medina Spirit, is a junky. This is emblematic of what is happening to our Country. The whole world is laughing at us as we go to hell on our Borders, our fake Presidential Election, and everywhere else!

https://web.archive.org/web/20210509170756/https://www.donaldjtrump.com/desk/desk-8pttbep59x/

load more comments (2 replies)

[-] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago

It's definitely for the best so a coach doesn't do it to another minor.

[-] brezel@kbin.social 118 points 11 months ago

i will never understand why anyone lets russia compete in anything. they just always lie and cheat.

load more comments (9 replies)

[-] Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world 78 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

That took a long fucking time. Opposed to the US sprinter who tested positive for a non-performance enhancing drug (weed) and was giving a suspension just 9 days after initial test results. Keeping her from even going to her games.

This girl had tested positive for performance enhancing drugs and was still allowed to compete. So they could take the next two years to get their shit together. Look I know she was 15 and probably had a choice on where to take them, but that doesn't justify the wildly different responses.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/sports/sha-carri-richardson-could-miss-olympics-after-failed-drug-test-n1272960

Spelling

load more comments (5 replies)

[-] robocall@lemmy.world 49 points 11 months ago

Imagine winning the gold medal two years after you lost it. Imagine trying to explain the celebration party to people and them not caring or believing you.

[-] drbluefall@toast.ooo 18 points 11 months ago

I imagine that does undercut the excitement on some level.

Like, it's an amazing achievement nonetheless, but like... the wind's already gone. Sail's empty.

[-] Coreidan@lemmy.world 40 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Ban Russia forever. They deserve it.

The only title they are worthy of is “weak” and/or “cheater”.

[-] maness300@lemmy.world 32 points 11 months ago

I don't think they should be banner "forever", but definitely increasing lengths the more this goes on.

They should also have to pay a lot of concessions to other nations if they want back in.

[-] rasmus@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

We can ban Russia but let individuals that met and test international standards compete

[-] urist@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I see you've spawned a heated argument. I know this post is old but I have a different take:

Don't ban Russia. It's just athletics, it's not that big of a deal. All athletes should get the chance to compete even if they live in countries that encourage their cheating. Ban the cheaters and their coaches when they are exposed.

Perhaps ask Russia to pay a fine if they wish to continue to send athletes. This would dissuade them from forcing their young adults/teens to alter their body chemistry.

The Olympics is supposed to be somewhere every country can participate.

load more comments (1 replies)

load more comments (14 replies)

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 38 points 11 months ago

Should have happened during the Olympics, but the IOC gave the Russians the win.

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 30 points 11 months ago

Yeah, like you don't get that moment back, standing on the podium while your national anthem plays.

[-] pjwestin@lemmy.world 26 points 11 months ago

I feel really bad for this girl. Disqualifying her was the right move, but I highly doubt a fifteen-year-old representing Russia in the Olympics was given much choice as to whether she wanted to use performance enhancers or not. On top of that, she got four year ban from professional skating, which basically robbed her of her peak professional years. Her career was basically destroyed by something that was, best case senerio, a mistake she made at fifteen or, wost (and more likely) case, something that was forced on her by her trainers/managers.

[-] YeetPics@mander.xyz 19 points 11 months ago

Wow this is the first time ever I've heard of Russia cheating on something because they couldn't win from skill alone.

[-] Stovetop@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 11 months ago

A Russian caught doping? At the Olympics??

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] aniki@lemm.ee 13 points 11 months ago

Boycott these worthless games.

[-] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

I strongly disagree. The Olympics are one of the best things humanity does. Are the people running it corrupt scum? Pretty much. But the Olympics are one of the only times the whole world comes together to at least attempt to do something positive.

Also, have you ever watched the 49 kg (108 lb) women’s weightlifting competition? They look like ants lifting multiple times their body weight. It’s fucking awesome.

[-] aniki@lemm.ee 5 points 11 months ago

I'd rather not reward the IOC with my patronage and eyeballs viewing the blatant consumerism and capitalistic nature of what should be a wonderful event. The IOC takes home billions and the athletes get nothing.

Sorry, I vote with my wallet and my principles.

[-] deranger@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 months ago

I don’t think either of you is wrong. One of you is talking about the concept of the Olympics and the other the IOC.

load more comments (5 replies)

[-] Kata1yst@kbin.social 12 points 11 months ago

Man, all these world class athletes from Russia have these horrible heart conditions at such young ages!

Must be something in the water...

[-] DerpyPoint@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

I can't imagine how the Canadian team is feeling with their medal chances on limbo over these two years

[-] Fades@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Just another dirty Russian cheater, second only to china’s culture of cheating/theft.

This poor girl was undoubtedly forced into taking the meds, ruining her future.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 6 points 11 months ago

Why on earth would they try doping? They know that people are tested, I don't get how they think that's going to work. They either need to stop cheating, or they need to get much better at it.

load more comments (4 replies)

[-] disconnectikacio@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

If you play any game with ruskies you learn this: ruskies always cheating, stealing, scamming.

load more comments

this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2024

487 points (97.7% liked)

World News

39385 readers

2268 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.