304
submitted 11 months ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

Stop wearing Vision Pro goggles while driving your Tesla: U.S. transportation officials, Calif. police::Videos, many of them stunts or jokes, of people wearing Apple’s new virtual reality headset while driving Teslas in Autopilot mode prompted officials to issue warnings.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ArmoredThirteen@lemmy.ml 85 points 11 months ago

The new goggles have a feature that merges digital apps and one’s surroundings into one immersive space

Isn't this just AR? We've had that for years. Or is it somehow different from existing AR?

[-] Benaaasaaas@lemmy.world 127 points 11 months ago

Ah, you seem to have made a rookie mistake, poor people are using AR, apple users are using spatial computing

[-] Dran_Arcana@lemmy.world 62 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

It is ~slightly~ different, but in a way that's worse.

AR uses a transparent overlay over reality perceived through a translucent surface, or at most a small subset of your vision is replaced. Think sunglasses with a screen you can see through, or a small corner of your vision is blocked by a tiny screen.

In Apple's "spatial computing" cameras recreate and alter reality, nothing you see is with your own eyes because no part of the display is transparent.

[-] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 30 points 11 months ago

Exactly, it's VR with passthrough.

I have to laugh at "spatial computing" though.

[-] datelmd5sum@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago

And VR with passthrough has been a thing at least in pro grade VR for like a decade.

[-] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 6 points 11 months ago

Ima call it vr with passthrough from now on

[-] Benaaasaaas@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

AFAIK there is no strict definition for AR how current reality has to be implemented, and both transparent and reprojected have their advantages and disadvantages. For example it's much harder to "pin" augmentation on transparent AR, on the other hand latency and FOV are big issues for reprojected AR.

[-] Zron@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

You ever seen the myth busters episode where they try to drive a car through cameras and computer monitors?

It didn’t go well

[-] Benaaasaaas@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

While I completely agree that it is a very bad idea to drive with one, you have to give credit where credit is due. Apple really did an amazing job at reducing latency of the passthrough. That being said it's still added latency and it's a very very narrow FOV so please don't go driving/walking around with that thing.

[-] laughterlaughter@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Oh shit. That makes them less appealing, then.

I wish I could say this scenario is unlikely, but nowadays? Who knows! So, picture this:

  • John likes to use his Apple goggles from 11pm to 1am.
  • Hackers get into his googles and install some malware.
  • Now they can walk in front of John without being seen.

That wouldn't happen if the goggles were truly transparent.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] ArmoredThirteen@lemmy.ml 13 points 11 months ago

Oh shit I don't want to be a poor people I need to get something with spatial computing!

[-] BeatTakeshi@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

That's the point where you sell your fridge and cut on baby diapers for your kids

[-] Cosmicomical@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

AR just means augmented reality, it says nothing of how it should be implemented

[-] snek@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

I watched some reviews about it. Yes, it's basically like having an iPad screen taped to your eyes.

load more comments (12 replies)
[-] caoimhinr@lemmy.world 56 points 11 months ago

First we had the Glassholes, now there's Prolapses.

[-] breakfastmtn@lemmy.ca 56 points 11 months ago

And Jesus wept for there were no more worlds to conquer

[-] iamericandre@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago
[-] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 18 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Stop saying stop saying Jesus wept

[-] ripcord@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

I wonder if your downvoters know that this was a line from the episode

[-] iamericandre@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

Probably not

[-] moogar0880@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

World's within worlds!

[-] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 11 months ago

Speculating on the vastness of the universe, Alexander wept. Asked why, he replied Is it not worthy of tears, that, when the number of worlds is infinite, we have not yet become lords of a single one?

[-] Guntrigger@feddit.ch 47 points 11 months ago

So there was a guy in the "viral video" thread yesterday fighting tooth and nail for how harmful the video is even if it's staged, mainly on the premise thats bunch of people would copy and recreate it. They were getting downvoted to oblivion.

Here we are a day later.

[-] Fudoshin@feddit.uk 12 points 11 months ago

They were getting downvoted to oblivion.

Downvotes are a fucking curse. They were never meant for disagreement. They've just turned into low-effort echo-chamber creators.

[-] poopkins@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago

Ironically, I've been downvoted for saying this in response to somebody sympathizing with my previous downvoted comment that was expanding in support of somebody's highly upvoted comment with some background.

I think the general sentiment on Lemmy is that any comment reply must surely be in disagreement and receives an automatic downvote. Mostly I visit the comments for discourse and upvote interesting threads of conversation.

In my opinion, really there should be no downvote button.

[-] max@feddit.nl 9 points 11 months ago

It really is just Reddit 2.0 here sometimes…

[-] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

Always has been.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] laughterlaughter@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I prefer to have downvotes because they give you a better picture than, say, upvotes only.

Popular or important comments in an upvote-only system will still float to the top. And now we don't know how many people disagreed (HA!) with them.

[-] TheFriar@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago

Yup. The amount of times I saw a comment that was downvoted to oblivion for containing a shred of nuance and that required the most minute sliver of time’s worth of critical thinking getting downvoted unjustly boggles the brain. Downvotes are literally contagious for probably 50%-60% of users. When a few downvoted roll in to something slightly nuanced, the already small likelihood that people could engage with the nuance drops to absolute zero and the downvotes just keep piling up. Says quite a lot.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] macattack@lemmy.world 33 points 11 months ago

I expect nothing less from Tesla drivers

[-] Petter1@lemm.ee 18 points 11 months ago

How can people be so stupid.. At least, a VR headset is easy spottable by police and those bastards can be removed from the streets.

[-] r00ty@kbin.life 14 points 11 months ago

Dante Lentini, 21, who posted a video of himself behind the wheel of a moving Tesla while wearing a Vision Pro headset, said in an interview, “It was all just for content.”

Well, maybe when they revoke their licence they can tell them "it was all just for other people's safety".

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ohlaph@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago

Better yet, stop driving Tesla.

[-] vox@sopuli.xyz 8 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

it's basically just hololens right?
also visionos is not the first "spatial os", windows 10 was the first. (ever notice how stuff has circular glow effect around it? it's supposed to show up around the pointer while using the os in vr/ar)
Microsoft quickly abandoned the idea tho as well as basically the whole uwp platform (which was supposed to bring the same apps on pc, windows mobile, xbox and hololens)

[-] G0ldenSp00n@lemmy.jacaranda.club 8 points 11 months ago

It's camera pass-through, so while it is the same idea as hololens (overlaying windows on reality). The hololens would actually be a safer thing to wear while driving, given it fully transparent. There are not screens blocking your vision with camera feeds overlayed on top.

[-] vvv@programming.dev 7 points 11 months ago

Very important distinction. When the apple vr battery dies, or the software fails, you're suddenly blind.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] excitingburp@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Hololens is slightly more advanced. At least the last I saw it uses waveguides etc. to overlay the content over a transparent panel. Much like Google glasses, but way, way more advanced (and therefore justifiably expensive - last I saw, again, it was something like $15000). AVP is no different to a $300 Quest (plus internal cameras for iris and expression tracking and obnoxiously bad FOV) - it's 10x Apple tax.

Hololens is still alive and kicking btw, but it's exclusively enterprise.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 2 points 11 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Videos being shared across social media this week depict an almost dystopian, futuristic scene: drivers of Teslas in Autopilot mode while wearing Apple Vision Pro headsets, seemingly unaware of the road in front of them.

The new goggles have a feature that merges digital apps and one’s surroundings into one immersive space, and videos of people wearing them in strange settings have started to crop up across the internet since they were released on Feb. 2.

Dante Lentini, 21, who posted a video of himself behind the wheel of a moving Tesla while wearing a Vision Pro headset, said in an interview, “It was all just for content.”

Across social media, videos and images have circulated not just of people driving while wearing the Vision Pro headset, but also while dining at restaurants and working out at the gym.

Eric Decker, a YouTube and TikTok creator who goes by the name Airrack, posted a video poking fun at an “average day for an Apple Vision Pro owner,” showing him wearing the headset while lifting weights at the gym, getting his hair cut, going through airport security, walking down a street and even showering.

Apple has billed Vision Pro as a “spatial computing” device that allows users to watch videos, send emails and surf the internet in a immersive virtual reality.


The original article contains 783 words, the summary contains 220 words. Saved 72%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2024
304 points (96.3% liked)

Technology

60319 readers
2923 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS