534

Will anyone actually buy this argument?

top 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 90 points 8 months ago
[-] isthingoneventhis@lemmy.world 20 points 8 months ago

Seeing this episode when it came out vs in 2023 really hit different. It never dawned on me how finely honed their comedy was that season.

[-] freebee@sh.itjust.works 0 points 8 months ago
[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -1 points 8 months ago

Basic Cable

South Park: Season 23, Episode 9

[-] gregorum@lemm.ee 69 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I’d like to think that this is all some massive gambit by the FCC to get all these assholes on record so they can build some massive RICO case to take them all down in a massive price fixing and defrauding scheme.

But I am high right now.

[-] underwire212@lemm.ee 61 points 8 months ago

Believe it or not, the same study actually said giving me a million dollars is also a good thing

[-] NotMelon@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I accidentally send you 2 million could you please send back 1 million?

[-] wabafee@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

How many gift cards is that?

[-] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 8 months ago

please take in your hand a pen and a piece of paper

please be in front of your computer right now

[-] Smeagol666@lemm.ee 3 points 8 months ago

If you do not pay us the IRS, we will put you under the rest.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Omg I got one a few months ago from the "Medicare Police". Most hilarious stuff I've heard in a long time.

[-] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 8 months ago

You will be behind the bars!

[-] underwire212@lemm.ee 2 points 8 months ago

WHY DO YOU REDEEM

[-] afunkysongaday@lemmy.world 53 points 8 months ago

"See when I slap you in the face that's actually a really nice thing of me to do. Because if I don't slap you in the face I'd kick you in the groin really hard instead. Do you want to get kicked in the groin? No? That's what I thought."

[-] RegalPotoo@lemmy.world 44 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

CW: DV >!"we'll have to raise prices if early termination fees are banned" has a real "look how you made me hurt you" abuser vibe.!<

I'm imagining the logic is something like "predatory fees generate $xx million in revenue a year, so if we lose that revenue source we will have to put our other fees up to compensate, because as a multi-billion dollar company our shareholders will get all butthurt if our profit drops by a fraction of a percentage point next year"

[-] rxmc@lemmy.world 40 points 8 months ago

Cable companies say they'll will raise the price without early termination fees? Oh please. They'll do that whether there's early termination fees or not. They're just threatening to bump it up on the schedule.

[-] smegger@aussie.zone 34 points 8 months ago

Only if they buy the argument that it's too difficult to explain what the hidden charges are for so they shouldn't have to.

[-] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 30 points 8 months ago

Yes, Republicans.

[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 29 points 8 months ago

"Early termination fees are good because without them, we will just do something worse."

[-] wewbull@feddit.uk 3 points 8 months ago

Which is better because then they are being upfront about the charges, and more people can tell them to fuck off.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -1 points 8 months ago

Something better, as the price would be overt and transparent rather than arbitrary and hidden.

[-] cm0002@lemmy.world 24 points 8 months ago

What are these Cable TV companies smoking? I want some!

[-] theodewere@kbin.social 26 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

high grade monopoly is a tough habit to kick

[-] Trashcan@lemmy.world 17 points 8 months ago

Early termination fees are not that horrible. They can give you a monthly cost where some of the costs for installing it might be distributed over they contact period. Fine and ok

But i should still be able to cancel my contract without jumping through 11 loops and queues.

If you sign up for a given contract, that's what you have agreed upon. It sucks if you only have one option and they can set a ridiculous price. So if you want to regulate pricing, that's a different matter. Cancelling is something else altogether.

[-] SupraMario@lemmy.world 20 points 8 months ago

What costs to install equipment? Most homes are already wired for their services. The lines they roll out to new users are usually subsidized by taxes and running coax into a house is not that expensive.

[-] Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 8 months ago

Doesn't stop them from charging.

[-] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 8 points 8 months ago

You mean the installation which was provided for free as a “limited special offer” for new members but is actually already accounted for in the price?

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

If you sign up for a given contract

Listen, it says clear as day down here in the fine print that I get a pound of flesh closest to your heart. I don't see what you're complaining about, a contract is a contract.

[-] r00ty@kbin.life 16 points 8 months ago

Cable companies "We'll raise monthly prices if you ban termination fees"

Lol, they're going to raise them anyway!

[-] bruhduh@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

CEO's always think in quarters, they said "we don't raise monthly prices (in this quarter) if you don't ban termination fees"

[-] _number8_@lemmy.world 15 points 8 months ago

early termination fees for anything are complete made up bullshit

[-] Alph4d0g@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 8 months ago
[-] Humanius@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Thanks for adding the link to the article, but it might be more convenient if you also add the link to the post description.
Currently this comment is showing up at the bottom of the thread for me.

[-] Alph4d0g@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 8 months ago

Fair! I intended to have it in the original post but it didn't take. Likely my error.

[-] Zellith@kbin.social 9 points 8 months ago

Yar har, fiddle de dee!

[-] kromem@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

Not like there's a parallel market in cell phone contracts before and after T-Mobile's branding as an 'uncarrier' to showcase that this is complete bullshit or anything...

[-] Got_Bent@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

Getting yourself involved with a cable company is worse than borrowing money from your local waste management representative. Easy to get in, impossible to get out.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Me, the cable company: "If you don't let me charge people an assortment of fines and fees after they've signed up for service, then I'll increase our base rate before they sign up."

Consumers, looking at the high price of cable: "Fuck, I can't afford this. Guess I won't sign up."

Me, the cable company: "Regulations are destroying my business!!!"

[-] BudgieMania@kbin.social 1 points 8 months ago

a threat that doesn't pass even the slightest sniff test, any significant raise in prices would leave them open for a competitor to undercut them.

[-] Im_old@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago

For what I understand, a lot of places in US have only a single provider available, so no competition. And when towns try to run their own broadband infrastructure they get sued by Internet companies.

[-] Num10ck@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

luckily theres also 5G wireless home internet and starlink, usually also telecom land options as well.

[-] afunkysongaday@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

Yet another problem the free market will surely solve aaaaany minute now.

[-] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

You mean the one other provider in the area? They raised prices too because it's be easier to pump existing customers for more than entice people to switch.

[-] Twentytwodividedby7@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Yes, eliminating a revenue source in one area means they will just price for it elsewhere.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Oh look. The "We'll hurt people a different way if you stop us from hurting them this way!" argument.

I wonder who else has made that argument? Oh yeah the Mafia and Cartels.

[-] Paragone@lemmy.world -1 points 8 months ago

those who are lobbied will buy whatever argument they are paid to buy.

_ /\ _

this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2024
534 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

58706 readers
4112 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS