113
Brick-Interleaved Layers (www.youtube.com)

3D prints still suffer from bad layer adhesion due to their 2.5D slicing and printing approach. I investigated if a novel slicing method that interleaves the layer could improve the strength of 3D prints.

all 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] IMALlama@lemmy.world 45 points 10 months ago
[-] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 29 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Jesus, in hindsight, this is such an obvious and great design trick to increase strength that I'm surprised it didn't become more popular earlier.

[-] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 10 points 10 months ago

Love his empirical testing and experimentation.

[-] LazaroFilm@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

This makes a lot of sense. I could see this being used for printed buildings and it would be a cull circle.

[-] BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

it would be a cull circle.

I don't care what you say, I ain't going in that circle with you!

[-] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 6 points 10 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://piped.video/watch?v=5hGm6cubFVs

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[-] Kata1yst@kbin.social 5 points 10 months ago

Now we just need half-width extrusions on the outer wall!

[-] p1mrx@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago

The thumbnail shows a hexagonal tiling, which is like a brick-laying pattern but rotated 90 degrees, so the "half bricks" are on the top and bottom, not the sides.

Maybe it would still work to orient the hexagons so the zig-zag part is on the walls, and then fill in the gaps with half-height half-width walls. Although "half" isn't exactly correct; the hexagons give you ugly trig numbers.

[-] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

You don't need any ugly trig. You can just use a magic number. The magic number in question is 0.8660254, which is the ratio between the width of the longways (point-to-point) to shortways (flat-to-flat) dimensions of a regular hexagon. If you need half of that, divide it by 2 afterwards.

[-] p1mrx@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago

magic ⇏ ¬ugly

[-] jkrtn@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago

What is that? You do two half widths for each perimeter and it increases strength?

[-] Kata1yst@kbin.social 4 points 10 months ago

Just an offhand idea. If you look at the print in the thumbnail, you can see that while this clever brick-interleaving has eliminated the straight lines along the xy plane, the Z axis still has straight lines. Eliminating that so you have a "brick-interleaving" in all axis seems the most optimal.

[-] tortiscu@feddit.de 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Well you need either that or the video's idea. I think yours could be easier to implement and it requires fewer z-movements (and no reordering, can't remember if the video did that)

[-] jkrtn@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago

Oh, I see what you're getting at, interesting. I hope these land in a slicer sometime, it would be interesting to try out.

this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2024
113 points (95.2% liked)

3DPrinting

15797 readers
56 users here now

3DPrinting is a place where makers of all skill levels and walks of life can learn about and discuss 3D printing and development of 3D printed parts and devices.

The r/functionalprint community is now located at: or !functionalprint@fedia.io

There are CAD communities available at: !cad@lemmy.world or !freecad@lemmy.ml

Rules

If you need an easy way to host pictures, https://catbox.moe may be an option. Be ethical about what you post and donate if you are able or use this a lot. It is just an individual hosting content, not a company. The image embedding syntax for Lemmy is ![](URL)

Moderation policy: Light, mostly invisible

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS