737
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 516 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Judkins said that after the finger test, a lead cybertruck engineer at Tesla said he did the video wrong.

The engineer told him the frunk increases in pressure every single time it closes and detects resistance, Judkins said. It's going to assume you want to close the frunk and maybe something like a bag is getting in the way, which would make it close harder.

Are you kidding me? You did the test wrong on a safety critical feature? No you dumbass engineer, you designed it wrong. Why in the holy fuck would you make a safety critical algorithm keep applying more pressure on subsequent attempts??? That's literally the opposite of what you do for safety.

[-] ech@lemm.ee 139 points 7 months ago

The engineer told him the frunk increases in pressure every single time it closes and detects resistance, Judkins said. It’s going to assume you want to close the frunk and maybe something like a bag is getting in the way, which would make it close harder.

What the fuck kind of idiots are leading things over there? "Something's in the way. Better crush it!" What a bunch of morons putting everyone in danger.

[-] barsquid@lemmy.world 49 points 7 months ago

"If it encounters resistance, the brushless motor increases in pressure until it closes fully." Guess the company:

  1. DeWalt
  2. Milwaukee
  3. Makita
  4. Tesla
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] barsquid@lemmy.world 99 points 7 months ago

Why the hell would it close harder if there is something in the way? That's not the correct behavior for a lid, that's the correct behavior for powered shears.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 89 points 7 months ago

We built it wrong as a joke

[-] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 53 points 7 months ago

Cybertruck owners can have a finger guillotine. as a treat

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] jonne@infosec.pub 56 points 7 months ago

I wonder if the guy that designed autopilot had the same idea. "So when the car detects resistance up ahead in the form of a crowd or wall, it will accelerate to make sure it goes through!"

load more comments (32 replies)
[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 211 points 7 months ago

Feel like this could have been demonstrated with a hot dog

[-] Fermion@mander.xyz 101 points 7 months ago

Or a chicken drumstick for somewhat similar bone strength.

[-] nokturne213@sopuli.xyz 54 points 7 months ago

Is this the dipstick that tried it with a carrot, it cut the tip off and then said he was going to try it with his finger to be sure?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)
[-] CleoTheWizard@lemmy.world 60 points 7 months ago

He did demonstrate it that way, specifically with a carrot. And it somewhat worked. The problem is they programmed it to do more and more pressure every time it fails meaning that doing the carrot first actually caused a safety issue. He only moved onto his finger because the safety feature seemed to be working.

[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 36 points 7 months ago

The engineer told him the frunk increases in pressure every single time it closes and detects resistance, Judkins said. It's going to assume you want to close the frunk and maybe something like a bag is getting in the way, which would make it close harder.

Geniuses.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] tedu@azorius.net 128 points 7 months ago

There's plenty of dumb to go around, but the word frunk by itself is the dumbest thing about this story.

[-] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 45 points 7 months ago

I figured that was a fucking typo at first

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Jerkface@lemmy.world 32 points 7 months ago

Let me guess: Front trunk? Please tell me I'm wrong.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] bcron@lemmy.world 117 points 7 months ago

Man youtubers are dumb as hell. Use a stick or something

[-] bitchkat@lemmy.world 81 points 7 months ago

He used a banana, an organic dildo, and a carrot. It snapped the carrot and then he decided to try with his arm, hand, and finger.

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[-] NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world 111 points 7 months ago

A Tesla engineer said the test was done wrong because the frunk increases in pressure every time.

"You are holding it wrong!" 🤣

[-] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 71 points 7 months ago

Of course it just keeps hitting harder when things are in the way.

Literally Tesla's response

load more comments (12 replies)
[-] Chozo@fedia.io 44 points 7 months ago

He did the test wrong because he's experimenting with "safety" algorithms that the manufacturer has provided little-to-no documentation on and is having to come up with answers on his own. Maybe he wouldn't be "doing it wrong" if Tesla hadn't over-engineered every aspect of their piece of shit truck in the first place. This thing is a solution in search of a problem, and it'll chop your fingers off until it finds it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ozymandias117@lemmy.world 40 points 7 months ago

If it increases in pressure every time, I’m now curious how many times you need to close the trunk to cut a finger off

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] slaacaa@lemmy.world 32 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

He forgot to turn on Finger Safe Mode™️ before closing the trunk

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Zehzin@lemmy.world 76 points 7 months ago

Judkins said that after the finger test, a lead cybertruck engineer at Tesla said he did the video wrong.

lmao

[-] saigot@lemmy.ca 31 points 7 months ago

Well apparently it's programmed to bypass the safety system after 3 attempts under the assumption that the user knows best.

This seems like a really dumb choice, but I can see why an engineer would want to point out that it's not incompetent engineering but an incompetent business department.

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] ShortFuse@lemmy.world 68 points 7 months ago

Judkins said that after the finger test, a lead cybertruck engineer at Tesla said he did the video wrong.

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] asteriskeverything@lemmy.world 67 points 7 months ago

You know what they say.. Don't stick your finger in crazy

[-] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 57 points 7 months ago

Bought it to begin with so his intelligence is suspect at the outset

[-] DAMunzy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 57 points 7 months ago

Title: Idiot Cybertruck Owner.

That's all you need for the title.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 54 points 7 months ago

What person with an automated cargo door closure mechanism has thought "stop protecting my stuff and just fucking close"?

I'll admit it annoys me when there's something in the way that keeps my door from latching and it reopens, but I'd rather have to clear the door and shut it manually than it force itself closed and jams the door or break my shit.

[-] Agent641@lemmy.world 33 points 7 months ago

Its just like elevators, really. You put your hand in to stop the doors closing, they open again before touching your arm. Next time they close gently on your arm. Third time, the doors snap shut and the elevator ascends without further warning, resulting in traumatic amputation.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ristoril_zip@lemmy.zip 44 points 7 months ago

Someone should tell this guy that hot dogs exist.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 43 points 7 months ago

The cybertruck is the dumbest tech product and that's after you compare it to the Vision Pro and AI pin

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] froh42@lemmy.world 40 points 7 months ago

Do we also have something like r/dontputyourdickinthat on lemmy?

[-] nutsack@lemmy.world 37 points 7 months ago
[-] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 44 points 7 months ago

I saw my first cybertruck in person the other day. It looks incredibly dumb in promotional photos, but it's astonishing how much stupider it looks in traffic surrounded by normal vehicles.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Emmie@lemm.ee 35 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

This is live example of how IQ doesn’t correlate with „success” though who knows if this funny test would even correlate with what we mean when we think of intelligence in this example

Maybe the greed for views and fanboism wins over no matter the brains

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 35 points 7 months ago

The YouTuber started the video by closing the frunk on produce like a carrot, cucumber, and banana before the update was installed. The frunk chopped all of the produce when it was placed in the frunk.

...

The YouTuber then tried the same test with the update installed and was impressed with the improvement.

"With just a software update, the Tesla Cybertruck frunk is way safer," he said. "We witnessed it destroy a ton of vegetables, and then post-update did nothing."

He didn't do a finger until building confidence first. He also tried an arm and then his hand before finally trying his finger.

So not as crazy as the article made it out to be, and his finger wasn't seriously hurt either, but it hurt enough that he didn't want to try it again after getting info from the engineer about it getting stronger after each failed attempt.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Emerald@lemmy.world 35 points 7 months ago

The crazy part to me is that he tried a carrot and it didn't open for it. Yet he thought it was a good idea to try his finger which it about the same size.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 04 May 2024
737 points (97.2% liked)

Technology

60123 readers
2683 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS