317
While Trump begs and pleads with SCOTUS to overturn his convictions, his followers tattle on witnesses in the form of doxxing.
I’d say this is childish behavior, but I know better behaved children.
This is how the mafia intimidates people.
I hate defending the Mafia, but at least they have the courage to show up in person. These faceless cowards release personal information from the comforts of anonymity.
Isn’t that what the right accuse antifa of doing?
Probably. Projection is the P in GOP.
Projectionists pee in the GOP??? Which theater is this and here's my resume
Ask Lauren Boebert. I hear she’s a fan of musicals.
I mean this in all seriousness: I haven't seen Beetlejuice the Musical, but that just seems like the kind of play that getting a handy during would give me an aversion to hand-jobs. Add all of the ensuing discourse and news, I'd probably have some serious intimacy issues.
Then again, hooking up with Boebert isn't exactly symptomatic of a healthy personality.
In fairness some of them won't be able to show up in person unless Jerry Springer shows up to take the front wall of their trailer off.
They also know that loyalty is a two-way street. You do something for me, and I'm going to reward you with loyalty in turn. If you look back over the series of events that led Michael Cohen to testify against Trump, it's pretty clear that Trump doesn't work that way.
Only a dimwitted clown would do anything for Donald without receiving payment up front.
"Tattle" "Chidlish behavior, I know better behaved children"
The person who gave testimony against one of the most dangerous people in the world just had the whereabouts of their spouse and children leaked, and your response is 'wow, look at the tattletales, how childish"
That’s fair. It’s also fair to say that appealing to the Supreme Court isn’t begging. I was using similes to liken their tantrums to childish behavior. See, I did it again.
I didn’t mean to minimize the impact, but ridicule their behavior.
There are doxxing websites? Like purpose-made? Isn't that illegal? Article doesn't mention the name, but says it has been used before. Wouldn't it just get deleted after the first time?
illegal where? do you think a website hosted in Russia or Pakistan is going to care about an american family whose details get listed there?
It's mind-blowing to me seeing Americans all surprised that their laws don't magically extend to every corner of the world through the internet. Crazy mfs lmao
What? No, young people that never saw a phone book are the likely cause here. It's not illegal to post publicly available details.
Tons of doxxing is nothing more than searching publicly available information. People who already know all the sources can do it easily. These websites would only make it accessible in one place.
Try doxxing yourself sometime. It's scary.
Then pay a service to de-dox yourself across all those web sites. It feels a bit like a mafia squeeze, but it works.
Do you have a good one you can recommend?
Google will keep you out of search results at least.
I love it when capitalism invents a problem and then sells me the solution.
this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2024
317 points (98.2% liked)
News
23669 readers
3371 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS