146
submitted 4 months ago by vegeta@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
all 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Volkditty@lemmy.world 93 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

She's an enemy of the state in the USA.

/low-hanging fruit.

[-] TheAuthor_13@lemm.ee 13 points 4 months ago

Came here for the same, easy purpose…

[-] cranakis@reddthat.com 40 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

American here but she's an enemy of mine. Slava Ukraini.

[-] ChihuahuaOfDoom@lemmy.world 34 points 4 months ago

She's an enemy of the state in the US as well. Constantly disrupting official proceedings, spouting Russian talking points, ignoring decorum. She's a fucking tool.

[-] f4f4f4f4f4f4f4f4@sopuli.xyz 26 points 4 months ago

Reminder: Conservatives already labelled themselves as enemies of the USA.

[-] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 12 points 4 months ago

By all means, invite her to witness what’s going on at the front. It would be awfully regrettable if she met an untimely end while on her tour. By which I mean, I would regret that this tactic hadn’t been tried sooner. She’s a quisling fascist of the highest order, and a categorical shitbag of a human being.

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 2 points 4 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene claimed Monday that she is an "enemy of the state" in the eyes of the Ukrainian government, though officials tell Newsweek that no such list exists.

Greene, a lawmaker from Georgia, has been one of the most outspoken voices in Congress against providing continued military and foreign aid to Ukraine in its two-plus-year war with Russia.

Last week, she received support from 46 fellow House Republicans on an amendment that would strike over "$433 million in NATO funding" from a Military Construction and Veterans Affairs appropriations bill, saying that the U.S. is "paying more than its fair share."

In a June 10 post on X, formerly Twitter, Greene touted "not giving a single penny to Ukraine" and said a so-called enemies list reinforces her opposition to funding the Eastern European nation.

Her post includes an image of her name on said list, blaming Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky while admonishing him as a leader and calling him the real "enemy."

The report has four authors who contributed to the project, said to have been funded exclusively by site readers and aimed to discover "inconsistencies" in how U.S. politicians have approached the ongoing war—and, in some cases, flip-flopped back and forth in terms of pro-Ukraine sentiment including approving aid.


The original article contains 691 words, the summary contains 211 words. Saved 69%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2024
146 points (94.5% liked)

politics

19022 readers
3834 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS