1019
submitted 5 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 204 points 5 months ago

I should fuckin well hope so

[-] Speculater@lemmy.world 135 points 5 months ago

Wait until veterans learn that they want to take away their healthcare and disability pay in order to give tax cuts to the rich. This is not hyperbole, that's literally one of the ways they intend to save money. Also making it so you can get your pension or VA disability, but not both.

[-] eldavi@lemmy.ml 30 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

i bet they'll still vote republican

UPDATE: watch the apologists try to say that it's not that bad below. lol

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 43 points 5 months ago

Bud, we already vote blue. Yeah there's some dumbasses out there voting for Trump but he did something no Democrat has been able to do in the modern era. He got the military to vote blue in 2020.

The Democrats have had trouble getting our VA stuff figured out but we're well aware the Republicans want us to actually just die in an alley somewhere.

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago

I’m glad that the wannabe dictator has pissed y’all off. Sorry about how he fucked y’all over, but it’s best that y’all don’t like him

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world 21 points 5 months ago

A lot of red voting trade workers need to understand how anti-union and anti-workers rights it is. And wave goodbye to overtime.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 17 points 5 months ago

Oh we know. That shit went through the grapevine faster than a bad southern idiom.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 32 points 5 months ago

It’s just about time for a MASSIVE march on Washington. These clowns are way too comfortable.

The Supreme Court is out of hand with zero pushback.

[-] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 11 points 5 months ago

Hate to say it, but protests and marches do jack shit these days in terms of pressuring our leaders.

[-] barsquid@lemmy.world 21 points 5 months ago

If there were anything approaching a general strike they would panic. They just don't give a shit when it's several thousand people on a weekend in NYC with their striking permits. Why would they? That's a small parade. St. Patrick's Day is a larger disruption for the city.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] NegativeLookBehind@lemmy.world 112 points 5 months ago
[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 44 points 5 months ago
[-] nifty@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Calling them punks is an insult to punks, they’re just scum

[-] normalexit@lemmy.world 25 points 5 months ago

Nazi Punks are neo-nazis in the punk scene. They are an insult to the scene, so people would say this before they punched a Nazi punk in the face.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Zier@fedia.io 99 points 5 months ago

No one wants to be a part of your fascist religious cult! Humans want freedom, not oppression.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] DarkDecay@lemmy.world 90 points 5 months ago

I think its funny that the more shit like this they push on me the further away from their ideologies I want to be. Vote blue and be done with leadership provided by conservatives, they only want to control us and I'm sick of it

[-] dexa_scantron@lemmy.world 89 points 5 months ago

Because every page is insane bullshit. Here's one I saw a post about and looked up, where they want to just straight up fire everyone in the Treasury Department who's participated in a DEI initiative:

[-] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 46 points 5 months ago

I'm pretty sure that these idiots who wrote this will only be happy once everyone in this country is miserable and dead. They hate everything about this country.

[-] nifty@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

The issue is that people don’t appreciate that DEI etc. are not about race per se, but about the problems and conflicts which happened (and still do) because people have different skin colors.

You cannot create ideology based on racial supremacy, and then complain when other people want to block degenerates like you from acting on that ideology.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Assman@sh.itjust.works 87 points 5 months ago

US public rapidly sours on turning US into fundamentalist shithole

[-] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 72 points 5 months ago

When the public pays any attention to conservative policy.

[-] skozzii@lemmy.ca 21 points 5 months ago

That's the issue is most people don't even do the most basic level of research, they just tune in to whatever news network they've listened to for their life, and do whatever they say, and its pathetic.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] expatriado@lemmy.world 65 points 5 months ago

cuz a christian theocracy regime plan doesn't sound like much fun

[-] jaybone@lemmy.world 59 points 5 months ago

When was the public ever in favor of this?

[-] Ultraviolet@lemmy.world 52 points 5 months ago

Never was. Their goal was to sneak it past the voters, that's why they keep lying about what's in it and concealing Trump's connection to it.

[-] uienia@lemmy.world 43 points 5 months ago

At no point in time. But it seems the public was largely ignorant, and thus apathetic, of it. The more knowledge, the more resistance.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] demizerone@lemmy.world 58 points 5 months ago

Tie that shit to Trump and his weasel running mate. He is already trying to back away from it.

[-] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 48 points 5 months ago

No shit, the vast majority of the public hates republican policy. Most people are too lazy to vote or vote against their best interests because of stupid reasons like racism or wanting to hurt others.

[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 43 points 5 months ago

Because it fucken sucks and its plain to see even through the legalese.

[-] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 42 points 5 months ago

How am I going to lock down my eighteen year old trad wife now?

[-] Angry_Autist@lemmy.world 34 points 5 months ago

Eighteen? Have you SEEN how hard they push to drop the age of consent?!

To the Gilead crowd, if she's not on her 2nd child by 18 then they send the council around to find out why.

[-] raef@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago

I think states with 18 is already a minority

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] mjhelto@lemm.ee 9 points 5 months ago

You misspelled fourteen.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 37 points 5 months ago

My kids are all IVF. We spent a lot of money on that. Money comes from countless work hours. On the sentimental side, it was a horrible rollercoaster ride of having to follow an injection schedule, going to the doc for check-ups or for removing eggs or for jacking off into a cup right next to the doctor's office. Lots of embarrassing moments. My kids are awesome and I would do it all over again. Fuck these project 2025 assholes. If I want to be gay and get IVF done, I will. I don't need to ask others for permission or legality. That's what freedom is about. That's what American is about.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] crawancon@lemm.ee 29 points 5 months ago

i bet hexabear mods have the proj2025 tattoo.

[-] Godort@lemm.ee 15 points 5 months ago

Nah, those guys want an entirely different flavor of authoritarian regime.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] mightyfoolish@lemmy.world 21 points 5 months ago

Was it actually popular? No one I know of even has heard of it.

Even Trump had the awareness to first implicitly write off Project 2025 by having these Black Americans For Trump meetings that no one showed up for - not even him). When that [obviously] didn't work he then explicitly said he wasn't part of this nonsense.

[-] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 30 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Yeah, but a bunch of people from his administration were involved in writing it, including Steve Bannon and Stephen Miller his deportation and immigration guy.

Project 2025 is focused on replacing public servants, with 'Trump Loyalists"... Such terms associated with Trump are laced throughout the document, showing up over 300 times... And JD Vance has also talked about this idea.

... Clarence Thomas has based his whole career on this idea, which he calls "Destroying the Administrative State", and Trump has always used the phrase "draining the swamp" and "destroying the deep state". It's also very much like his Fake electors plot that he was already involved with last election.

The whole idea behind Project 2025 is that a bunch of the legal documents to create a dictatorship (otherwise called "unitary executive theory") - where the powers of the executive branch would be greatly expanded - have already been written up, and Trump just needs to sign them on day one. After that, his unique powers would be legal.

....and he keeps saying "I'll only be a dictator on day one". Which seems to be in line with the Project 2025 plan.

Project 2025 was written by the Heritage Foundation, who often writes and recycles these plans. They wrote one for Reagan, which is why he cut the corporate tax rate, and one for bush suggesting invading Kuwait. So they often get what they want.

In 2018, they bragged on their website that two thirds of the previous "Mandate for Leadership" they wrote for Trump had been passed into law. So The Heritage Foundation is no small operation. They're a large part of how GOP candidates adopt a policy agenda.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_2025 for details.

[-] mightyfoolish@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago

Thank you for all of this info. I didn't reliaze this Heritage Foundation is so old. Still, it really does feel like the same old Regean era stuff they always put out. I guess that's the reason why the alarm isn't going on in many people's heads.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2024
1019 points (98.8% liked)

politics

19241 readers
2111 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS