65
submitted 3 months ago by oxjox@lemmy.ml to c/asklemmy@lemmy.world

It's a bit shocking to me when I see people online putting 9/11 conspiracies in the same box as "MAGA" conspiracies (for lack of a better term, sorry).

For reference, I was 24 in 2001 living in central NJ. Even without social media or fake news websites or what cable news has become today, I have vivid memories of people having the firm belief that there was something up with the attack on 9/11. Was this just my social circle?

Jet fuel melting steel beams was one of the more fringe and unfounded (and quickly debunked) ideas but the rest of everything on that day was questionable. Tower seven falling, the missing plane debris at the pentagon and central PA, the military / president not responding to known threats, if a person with limited flight time could hit a tower, the fact that Bush attacked a country that had nothing to do with the event, and so much more are still, I thought, reasonable questions - especially when looked at together.

This is not about rehashing each theory. Or maybe it is? Have I missed that everything has been debunked?

I mean, I still believe 9/11 was an inside job or at least high level officials, including Bush, were aware it was going to happen and did nothing to stop it. I thought this was still a common opinion of most or many Americans over the age of forty.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] palebluethought@lemmy.world 123 points 3 months ago

No, this was just your social circle. I know literally zero people who ever bought into any of that crap

[-] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 55 points 3 months ago

Seriously, it was pretty fringe to be openly truther back then.

It wasn't till Obama that we started getting all these batshit insane morons on parade.

Birtherism really pushed it, but basically losing 2008 made the right desperate, they were willing to recruit from anybody, anywhere, right when social media started its upswing.

I think we can say most of our modern conspiracitardacy was fairly quiet till the social media wave.

[-] oxjox@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 months ago

That is not what I recall. What I do recall was both republicans and democrats having serious concerns that the government knew something we didn't and that we were attacking a country for the president's personal vendetta. This is based on my personal interactions with friends, family, and coworkers, as well as national and local news and newspapers. Granted, I'm from central NJ so perhaps we on higher alert and more "purple" than the rest of the country.

batshit insane morons

Was it birtherism or just Sarah Palin?

I think we can say most of our modern conspiracitardacy was fairly quiet till the social media wave.

I fully agree that social media has made things worse in this, and almost every, regard. Though, I'm trying to understand the mindset of Americans in 2001, not today, not post 2008.

The conspiracy around 9/11 was that the government knew more than they were telling us. That perhaps they were well aware of the event, possibly took part in it, and/or used it to manipulate public sentiment for invading Iraq for no other good reason or perhaps (ok, this I admit is crazy) setting up a new world order where we give up our rights for the sake of "national defense". There would be no Wikileaks if there was no 9/11.

I admit this are a bit fringe-sounding but we were all aware of this back then. Didn't most people believe there was some plausibility in these theories?

Don't most people today believe the government knows more about 9/11 than they've told us?

[-] stinerman@midwest.social 16 points 3 months ago

we were attacking a country for the president’s personal vendetta

This had nothing to do with 9/11. Invading Iraq was much later. You're conflating the two.

"Bush did 9/11" is crazy talk. "Bush invaded Iraq because he wanted to get back at Saddam Hussein and make money for Halliburton" is not.

[-] oxjox@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 months ago

If it's your understanding that Bush's invasion of Iraq in 2002 "had nothing to do with 9/11", you are grossly mistaken.

https://www.congress.gov/107/plaws/publ243/PLAW-107publ243.pdf

[-] stinerman@midwest.social 13 points 3 months ago

My brother in christ, I'm not talking about the pretext the government used to attack Iraq. I'm talking about the fact that the two things had nothing to do with each other.

Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11. The fact that the government used that as a pretext doesn't magically link the two things.

[-] oxjox@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 months ago

I see.
Iraq - the country, had nothing to do with 9/11 - the attack.
Not, Iraq - the invasion of, was disassociated with 9/11 - the attack or national moment.

I mean, 9/11 and Iraq are indeed magically linked, thanks to Bush. "Magically" is actually a great word to define the link between the two. Look - Cheney just pulled a Saddam out of a Bush!

[-] Album@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 months ago

Yeah it had something to do with it in that it was used as an excuse to invade iraq - not in that iraq had any legitimate ties to 9/11.

https://www.brookings.edu/articles/9-11-and-iraq-the-making-of-a-tragedy/

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/may/19/george-bush-iraq-ukraine-speech

[-] Serinus@lemmy.world 19 points 3 months ago

Well, this one is real

Bush attacked a country that had nothing to do with the event

[-] palebluethought@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

Well, yeah. That's not really in the same category or ever really disputed

[-] mesamunefire@lemmy.world 17 points 3 months ago

Im so glad archive.org exists. People keep trying to change history when you can just go to archive.org and see all the real actions people took those days.

[-] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

I knew a dude who swore up and down the jets had missile launchers on the front they fired just before impact.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Jagothaciv@kbin.earth 44 points 3 months ago

The conspiracy is that the Saudi's funded it and the families of 9/11 are still going after them so I guess it's not a conspiracy. The stuff they found was pretty fucked up and deserves more investigation. Remember Bush protected Saudis and outed CIA agents probably to protect his obvious incompetence.

https://edition.cnn.com/2024/09/11/us/9-11-families-saudi-arabia-lawsuit/index.html

so I guess it’s not a conspiracy.

It's not a theory* it is a conspiracy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 38 points 3 months ago

I have vivid memories of people having the firm belief that there was something up with the attack on 9/11. Was this just my social circle?

"Conspiracy" covers a lot of area.

There's people that think explosives were planted because "jet fuel can't melt steel beams" and they've always been ridiculed.

There are people that look at facts that the different intelligence agencies had all the information to put it together, but due to Dick Cheney requiring each agency only report to him, he was the only one that saw every piece of the puzzle and would have known enough to stop it. GW didn't even know enough, because Cheney was the only one talking directly to GW.

So some people have always thought Cheney (whether on his own or not) allowed 9/11 to happen to justify the wars he started under Regean and HW to continue indefinitely.

There's people who claim Israel funded and caused it, when there isn't really any evidence.

There's people who claim Israeli spies were caught celebrating... But that was undocumented immigrants celebrating they got the day off work.

https://www.thejc.com/news/world/who-were-the-dancing-israelis-of-9-11-c7f9b960

That's how conspiracy theories spread.

They took a kernal.of truth and build on it till it becomes something completely out of control.

Immediately after 9/11 everyone had questions and that's 100% normal, I think that's what you're remembering.

It's not the same as insisiting an unfounded conspiracy theory was true based on spurious evidence.

[-] oxjox@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 months ago

Thank you for the most thoughtful and direct answer.

[-] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 25 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

9/11 in itself would not be as sketchy if they did not use it as pretext to force through a ton of privacy violation laws which just so happened to be ready and only needed an excuse. And invade the middle east with a convenient pretext. And the FBI having advance warnings about 9/11 which were ignored.

I don't care about whether it was jet fuel or pre planted explosives. 9/11 was used as an excuse to invade countries which we now know had nothing to do with it. And at the time the government knew they were lying about those countries complicity. So I still believe there is more to the story than what is made public.

[-] Curious_Canid@lemmy.ca 20 points 3 months ago

There is some evidence to suggest that the Saudis were involved in setting it up. Beyond that, there were endless conspiracy theories, none of which were widely believed. I've talked about it with a lot of people over the years and have yet to meet a single conspiracy theorist. The vast majority have never believed in a 9/11 conspiracy.

[-] pandapoo@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Not some evidence, clear and convincing evidence.

The problem is that the Saudi "government" is essentially comprised of competing factions of slave owning inbred cousins.

So saying the Saudi government was involved isn't as clear cut as it sounds for the purpose of adjudicating any "punishment".

Now, if KSA wasn't the lynchpin of America's Middle Eastern security apparatus, and viewed as integral to the entire American imperial project, then the US Security State's response would have likely been much different.

[-] oxjox@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 months ago

I’ve talked about it with a lot of people over the years and have yet to meet a single conspiracy theorist.

These theories were floated, with legitimacy, on local and national news, at the time. Not in the sense of, “it’s theorized that there were antifa plants at Jan 6” but “look here at this video and you could see how some implosion experts are saying this is the pattern for a scheduled building collapse”. They were interviewing people in manhattan who had concerns about a government coverup.

At the time, the regular news (before it got ridiculous) was pulling together all these theories and presenting them together. It was overwhelming that there was much more to this event. And it seems to have all been forgotten.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Album@lemmy.ca 17 points 3 months ago

Never known a real person to think it was an inside job, just internet whackos...so yea same as the Maga crowd - or any other whackjob conspiracy like flat earth, big foot, vaccines cause autism...

Central NJ - it's so close... so to me its no surprise ppl are speculating and then that transitions into conspiracy theories that are perceived as fact.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Canopyflyer@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago

I was 31 when the attacks happened.

While I do think that there was an awareness that an attack was possible, or even in the works. I sincerely doubt that anyone truly thought that 3 airplanes were going to be flown into buildings on that day and one crash in a PA field. The US had the attitude that we were isolated and well defended enough that such attacks were unthinkable. The complete one sidedness of Gulf War 1 really gave the US an out of proportion notion of being invulnerable. Even though the WTC was bombed 9 years prior, two years after the end of GW1.

Conspiracy denotes malicious intelligent intent. The reality is closer to stupidly complacent. Sometimes the two are hardly indistinguishable.

[-] N0body@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

There was a conspiracy involving 9/11, but it had nothing to do with secret thermite demolition or Israel or holograms or any of that nonsense. People were rightfully questioning how these hijackers were able to enter the US and stay under the radar while training for and executing the attack. We now know that Saudi officials helped them.

It's also worth noting that the Bush family has very, very deep ties to Saudi Arabia, which may have affected the investigation and how information concerning Saudi complicity was handled.

[-] Quexotic@infosec.pub 5 points 3 months ago

This exactly. It represented such a huge intelligence failure that it's very hard to believe that it wasn't allowed to happen to create an argument for war, that and it kinda rhymes with another (arguably preventable) event in history that was used to create a pretext for war... Pearl harbor. IMHO that was justified though, Nazis being pretty bad and all.

Also tower 7 seemed very sketchy, and I never believed that there was a whole plane's worth of rubble at the Pentagon.

The Patriot act was also a product of that, which if you'll recall is part of what Snowden uncovered.

[-] Ibaudia@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago

From my understanding it's pretty widely known that most intelligence agencies though something could happen but not the specifics, and chose not to act on that information or communicate with one another.

The exact reasons aren't known obviously. My gut tells me incompetence/apathy from government agencies. That's not a very cinematic or compelling answer, though, and I think a lot of people look for more interesting narratives.

Whenever a big tragedy like 9/11 happens, people tend to try and look for the Chekhov's gun that shows a deeper meaning or dramatic orchestration. That's just not real life though.

[-] Boozilla@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago

A lot of people made fun of those theories and sarcastically pretended to believe in them. Maybe that's what you remember. Our human memories are not very reliable.

[-] athairmor@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago

The only conspiracy that I or people I know may have given credence to is the idea that people high up in the House of Saud knew about, condoned and/or funded the attacks.

And there’s actual evidence that it’s not just a theory.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

For the first few weeks, everybody wanted answers, and when people don't get answers, we make them up.

I remember hearing and seriously considering nearly all of the theories you mentioned, but as we started to get more answers, most people just forgot about, or stopped listening to the conspiracies.

Unless, of course, you were DEDICATED to one of the conspiracies, and surrounded yourself with like minded people who dismissed any evidence that went against their beliefs. Much like MAGA when you mention all the evidence that Trump lost the last election, or committed over 34 felonies.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

The only thing I remember people being remotely close to believing was that Bush was so incompetent that he allowed a terrorist attack to happen.

It's not really a theory that Bush was an incompetent fuckwit, but it's highly debatable if they knew enough to stop it.

[-] oxjox@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 months ago

highly debatable if they knew enough to stop it.

Well, the theory that was floated at the time was that they didn’t want to stop it. The very fringe suggested it was entirely planned by the US. They (Bush et al) knew this would provoke our military and provide an excuse to attack the Middle East. To finish was Bush senior didn’t.

Again, I don’t really want to get down a rabbit hole of validating theories. I want to know if others recall this being a national conversation or if it was just the hundreds of people I knew and news outlets I was watching.

[-] Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

In my mind, it's not that the intelligence community had indisputable evidence that said "these people are going to hijack these plans at this time and simultaneously crash them into these buildings"...but moreso "there is chatter about an upcoming attack involving hijacked planes" but they didn't have enough to act on it.

Now...with that part said, I 100% fully agree that this attack was used as a blank-check excuse to invade the Middle East carte clanche.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

I definitely remember some people screeing about Bush and Cheney wanting it, but IIRC, everyone was treating it like suspicion at most.

The Epstein conspiracy theory was accepted FAR more readily, but then that's basically guaranteed to be true to some degree, even if it was truly just the jailors being incompetent fuckwits that wanted to take justice in to their own hands.

[-] Corno@lemm.ee 9 points 3 months ago

There are many people who like to fill in the gaps of things they don't understand with conspiracy theories. It takes some degree of understanding of physics to understand why the buildings collapsed in the manner that they did, why hollow aluminium airliners accelerating to extreme speeds imposed so much damage to the buildings, and also why there is typically less aircraft wreckage to be found when especially high speed crashes are involved.

In your case, it's probably just your social circle as none of my friends believe in 9/11 conspiracy theories.

[-] Roldyclark@literature.cafe 9 points 3 months ago

In my circle yeah we all said Bush did 9/11. Was def taken as fact by edgy skaters/stoners who watched a lot of early YouTube.

[-] Lemminary@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

And with good reason. It didn't help that Dubya was a sketchy sob!

[-] eightpix@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Loose Change comes to mind.

IYKYK.

[-] Rolder@reddthat.com 9 points 3 months ago

I’ve always thought the conspiracy theories like “Jet fuel can’t melt steel beams!” Were just memes, personally

[-] treadful@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 months ago

I think to the majority they were. But as with most online jokes, sometimes people believe them.

[-] inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

I still believe 9/11 was an inside job or at least high level officials, including Bush, were aware it was going to happen

Crazy talk. This was absolutely not a widely held opinion.

[-] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 5 points 3 months ago

It wasn't most people, but there were a lot.

[-] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 4 points 3 months ago

not in my circles. Certainly taken advantage of big time though with bad laws.

[-] kbal@fedia.io 4 points 3 months ago

Everyone who is aware of the facts agrees that the big terrorist attacks of 11 September 2001 were the result of a conspiracy. That the American president was in on it seems unlikely. Some of your "reasonable" questions seem ridiculous, such as the idea that a person having "limited flight time" makes any difference at all. The invasion of Iraq was the result of another conspiracy, one which was ongoing at the time and ready to use any convenient excuse to get started.

[-] pricecheck@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

"It's in the Bible", is what my boss at one time believed.

I started there a few years after the events and wondered why this guy kept a 9/12 newspaper front page on display. I thought it was in poor taste but so be it. Eventually the topic came up and he started spitting out bible quotes to explain it all clear as day. He also laughed at dinosaurs!

Sadly, enough of the others there were bible toters too and did not disagree. I moved on before the Trump and covid fun began but I'm sure it was nuts.

That office changed me to my core. Seeing people living so deep in their own fantasy world that they would apply those fantasies to real world events was truly depressing.

These were professional engineers. Not kooks. My time there made me lose any respect for religion. Fanatics and conspiracy theorists are all attention seeking story tellers in need of gullible listeners.

[-] MataVatnik@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

I still do, at least when it comes to the pentagon. There was also evidence of high frequency trading that occurred right before the attack.

[-] JustZ@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

It's not accurate to say Afghanistan had nothing to do with it. The Taliban government were directly helping to hide Bin Laden after the fact, and obviously it was not going to do anything to stop violent extremism, rather it was going to reward and encourage it.

I didn't support it when it started, and I certainly didn't support all twenty of the years we spent there, but I believe now that the decision to overthrow the Taliban at least initially was the right one. Maybe some people in Washington pushed and went along with it as a handout to the oil and defense industries, but I think most of the legislators went with it because they truly believed, as I do, that overthrowing the Taliban and helping the people build a new state, with real institutions, was a path towards securing lasting human rights to millions of people. No religious dictatorship can grant human rights, it's not theirs to give.

[-] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 months ago

Everyone has forgotten about the Project for a New American Century (PNAC)

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2024
65 points (76.9% liked)

Ask Lemmy

27277 readers
2534 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS