918

Police opened fire on a subway platform in Brooklyn during a confrontation with an alleged fare-beater, striking the man cops said was armed with a knife, two straphangers caught in the fray, and one of the firing officers, NYPD officials said Sunday.

One of those two passengers hit by the cops' bullets, a 49-year-old man, was hospitalized in critical condition after he was hit struck in the head, according to the NYPD.

The two officers who opened fire were assigned to patrol the Sutter Avenue subway stop in the 73rd precinct when they spotted a man skip the station turnstile and walk through an open gate toward the train platform, Chief of Department Jeffrey Maddrey explained at an evening press conference from Brookdale Hospital.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 237 points 3 months ago

Ahh yes. Nothing like killing a perp and a few bystanders for a few dollars' worth of fare. USA! USA!

[-] Lets_Eat_Grandma@lemm.ee 125 points 3 months ago

I think if people had even more guns this could have been avoided. What if there was a six year old with a 22 there to respond to the gunshots with some of his own? maybe less people would be dead.

Guns make everyone way safer. We need to start providing them in utero.

[-] Cephalotrocity@biglemmowski.win 60 points 3 months ago

How dare you politicize gun violence while a police officer is injured!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Garbanzo@lemmy.world 26 points 3 months ago

Take the guns from the police and give them to the embryos. I think you're on to something here.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (36 replies)
[-] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 161 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

NYPD goes HARD on toll jumpers, but there's virtually zero enforcement on traffic and cars. Everywhere I go I see assholes with illegally modified vehicles, degenerates speeding down shoulders and medians, motorcycles on crowded sidewalks and pedestrian paths, and too many drunk drivers to count. There are so many cases where one pig parked on the shoulder during rush hour would fund the city budget for a year.

Instead we get whole families of pigs loitering by the turnstiles

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 67 points 3 months ago

The NYPD also loves to go after jaywalkers and vagrants, particularly when they're interfering with the flow of street traffic.

Cars are King, baby.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 39 points 3 months ago

Who drives and who uses the subway.

That's your answer.

[-] Cheems@lemmy.world 24 points 3 months ago

Clearly that's where the money is. $2.90 goes hard

load more comments (16 replies)
[-] aaaaace@lemmy.blahaj.zone 154 points 3 months ago

NYPD: The dumbest kid from every high school on Long Island.

[-] 5oap10116@lemmy.world 33 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I'm in Suffolk and can confirm. Kid got a 680/2400 on the SAT. Not that the SAT is a great intelligence test but damn.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] rob_t_firefly@lemmy.world 97 points 3 months ago
[-] Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world 80 points 3 months ago

They used more money in ammunition than the amount of money the shootout started over!

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 33 points 3 months ago

Just having them there on detail probably costs more than they recover from fare evaders.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[-] Garbanzo@lemmy.world 56 points 3 months ago

“We will be working through the timeline of today, but make no mistake, the events that occurred on the Sutter Avenue station platform are the results of an armed perpetrator who was confronted by our officers doing the job we asked them to do," Donlon said.

Could we maybe not ask police officers to escalate minor and petty conflicts all the way up to shooting everyone in the immediate vicinity?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Grimy@lemmy.world 49 points 3 months ago

Schrodingers pig.

The cop shot an innocent bystander in the head but also shot another cop. Until trial, he is both a bad guy with a gun and a good guy with a gun.

[-] Xtallll@lemmy.blahaj.zone 48 points 3 months ago

NYPD pays $126,000 annual salary, that's about $60 an hour or $1 a minute, 4 cops respond to the fair jumper, if they spent more than 45 seconds on this it costs the city more than the fair was worth.

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 27 points 3 months ago

The point is not how much it costs.

The point is that a poor person needs punishment, and if they're lucky, they might get to shoot somebody.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Sgt_choke_n_stroke@lemmy.world 42 points 3 months ago

Imagine the 2 by standards suing the department getting and 6 million dollars. Because shooting a guy for jumping a turn style worth 2.90.

This is a joke they need to take that money out of the police officers pension.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 41 points 3 months ago

This obviously has in part to do with the toxic American gun culture and it's corrupt and untrained police, but alsonwoth it's misguided need for what it thinks is justice, and revenge for real or imagined crimes.

Shoplift something small? In you go with hardened criminals to punish punish punish, fuck you for daring to do that! No rehabilitation, just punish

A lot of Americans complain about low prison sentences in Europe, not understanding that the focus there is on actually solving the problem of crime, instead of revenge, revenge, revenge.

[-] frezik@midwest.social 24 points 3 months ago

It makes more sense if you start from the premise that there are "good people" and "bad people", and bad people need to be punished to protect good people. The people who do the protections--like Joe Arpaio--can do no wrong. Even if they seem to do bad things, that's just in the service of protecting good people.

This premise is bullshit, but everything follows from there.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 17 points 3 months ago

The problem is rooted in prison spending moving from a social cost to a private revenue stream.

It's the classic Cobra Effect of economics. Monetizing the solution to a problem creates an incentive to increase the instances of said problem.

In this case, we have criminalized the free use of public transportation in order to justify more spending on policing.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] whotookkarl@lemmy.world 38 points 3 months ago

Why hasn't the city released the full body cam footage?

[-] belathus@bookwormstory.social 41 points 3 months ago

Probably because there was no knife in the footage.

load more comments (16 replies)
[-] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 31 points 3 months ago

This is an age old American tradition of shooting people who try to stow on train cars. There is an image in American culture of the freighthopping hobo who is trying to find a better place to live and work despite not having a dime to his name. Of course in reality many people have been shot for doing that. Property and a few dollars is worth much, much more than a poor person's life.

[-] Krauerking@lemy.lol 30 points 3 months ago

Can we just go back to having a legitimate conductor who also has a protected union job that is properly staffed so that they can do occasional walks through the train to be able to offer ticketing services that allow for rapid and mass transit for the masses that connect us in a way that allows for fucking easy travel.

Please! Or can we at least stop treating trains like an old existing extension of the singularly for profit monopolies paid by the government they were and just straight up have been allowed to become again!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 30 points 3 months ago

This is like an unfunny onion article. The fact that there can be civilian casualties in NYPDs war on fare jumpers is just shameful. It's not for the money. They spend $150 million a year to recover $100k. Beyond an embarrassment.

[-] masterspace@lemmy.ca 21 points 3 months ago

I mean according to the article, technically they just tried to stop him over the $2.90 fare.

Then because of that he threatened to kill them and they realized he had a knife so they tasered him.

Then when that didn't work and he ran at them with the knife they opened fire.

Multiple people are still dead because they brought guns into a disagreement over $2.90, but the headline implies a lot more unreasonableness on the individual cops' parts as opposed to the overall policy.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 39 points 3 months ago

Then because of that he threatened to kill them

They claim he made a threat. The article failed to print his side of the story for some curious reason. It isn't printing any testimony from the bystanders, either.

Multiple people are still dead because they brought guns into a disagreement over $2.90, but the headline implies a lot more unreasonableness on the individual cops’ parts as opposed to the overall policy.

Cops will often lie about the danger of a suspect in order to justify elevating their use-of-force. That said, they weren't that concerned by his unreasonableness when they deployed tasers into the crowd first. They didn't switch to guns until they realized the tasers weren't going to work.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 21 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Then because of that he threatened to kill them and they realized he had a knife so they tasered him.

Then when that didn't work and he ran at them with the knife they opened fire.

Is the version of what's the killers are saying. I'll believe it when I see the camera footage. Good thing they have bodycams, so they can instantly prove their story.

[-] jaschen@lemm.ee 21 points 3 months ago

Can't we just make the Subway so cheap that it's not worth jumping the toll? Or make it so low income people get free fares.

[-] barsquid@lemmy.world 22 points 3 months ago

We could spend millions of dollars on making fares cheaper for people, but have you considered we can instead give that money to the police so they can prevent mere thousands of dollars in free rides?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[-] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 20 points 3 months ago

Such a reaction is insane, in other countries they would be prosecuted, right?

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 20 points 3 months ago

I am waiting for former cop PR man Adams' defense of the cops with bated breath.

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 21 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

It sounds like the guy had a knife and threatened to use it. It also sounds like the cops tried to taze the guy first, but it didn't work.

We can argue whether the cops really needed to shoot the guy. But they weren't shooting at a fare evader, they were shooting at a guy with a knife who also happened to jump the turnstile.

I'd argue that the real problem is that the cops didn't know how to de-escalate the situation without shooting. It's like the tazer was their only "non-lethal" option, and when that didn't work, they panicked. (I could also believe that they were simply incompetent, and couldn't work the tazer properly.)

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 26 points 3 months ago

The guy only threatened to use the knife after they stopped him for turnstile jumping. If the New York subway didn't have turnstiles (the L.A. subway doesn't), most people would still pay their fares. Most people understand that their fares keep the trains running. There was no need for this. At all.

I should say that there are transit cops that check tickets in L.A. If you don't have one, all they do is escort you out of the station. And this is the LAPD we're talking about.

load more comments (16 replies)
[-] unmagical@lemmy.ml 25 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Do we actually know if he had a knife? Initial reporting was that the police knew he had a knife because he refused to take his hands out of his pockets. While he did threaten them, it was contingent upon them continuing to follow them. He did not actually attack them until after multiple officers attempted to tase him. Furthermore, so what if he had a knife? As far as we're aware, he's got a second amendment right to keep and bear arms. Being armed isn't an excuse to be killed by cops because you are generally explicitly allowed to be armed.

All in all:

  • We don't know he's armed
  • We don't know his intentions
  • He didn't immediately attack anyone
  • While he did threaten them he made no indication that he intended to follow through until he was attacked
  • He continued to try to leave the situation until he was attacked
  • The police attacked him first
  • He didn't have a gun
  • 4 people were shot by the police; ~~he was killed~~ (this seems to have been erroneously reported earlier. He is now reportedly in critical condition), an officer and 2 bystanders were wounded
  • No one was stabbed

While that is textbook escalation, it really doesn't seem like they shot him cause he had a knife. They shot him (and 3 others) cause he didn't care about their authority and they couldn't let the guy that was already on the train go. And all that came about because he tried to skip a fare that costs around the same amount as the bullets fired.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net 18 points 3 months ago

How much would this criminal get away with?

Roughly $3.00.

The only message I got was cops are unhinged.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 16 points 3 months ago

Our system of regulation has become dysfunctional.

Our police system turns human beings into violence machines. If our police system creates behavior like this from the people closest to it then that system is broken.

The officers are doing what humans do when given too much raw force.

Change the system and the officers will change with it.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2024
918 points (97.9% liked)

News

23684 readers
3356 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS