Steam has now reached 38 million concurrent users : steam

[-] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 101 points 3 months ago

I love steam, but let's get real here for a second. Valve will change some day. Enshitification is inevitable.

GabeN will not live forever. The vultures circle endlessly, and one day they will win. There is no good ending here (for now).

Consider building a tower, downloading everything youve purchased on steam, and keep it offline. Maybe have a 2nd set of hard drives as a backup. Put these priceless artifacts in your will.

Plan accordingly and enjoy the ride while it lasts.

[-] Laser@feddit.org 22 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I love steam, but let's get real here for a second. Valve will change some day. Enshitification is inevitable.

Steam is an example where I'm not sure when it would happen.

It already comes with a hefty fee of 30% per sale on the platform. I don't think they can raise that without serious backlash. And there also isn't really a need, Steam prints money. It prints money because it's where users are. Users are there because they like the features. Some good features are only there because of laws (e.g. refunding); Valve can't remove these.

So how would you make the service even more profitable?

Enshittification happens because corporations want (more) money out of a service that built a userbase. These were often running at a loss. To turn a profit, they need to change.

Steam can sell you licenses to games you don't own already. It's up to each publisher. Valve doesn't care, they just deliver.

[-] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 months ago

They could add a fee to re-download games, a subscription requirement to use friend invites, start throwing spam notifications on your screen/in your email inbox about “sponsored content”, upload your browser history for better ad targeting, etc. the list gets pretty long pretty quickly. Just look at what the Epic store does right now (hint, it’s almost all of those things already).

[-] Laser@feddit.org 4 points 3 months ago

The Epic "Store" barely qualifies as such, no wonder they're trying to get at least something out of it

[-] pachrist@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

Think of it more like Netflix. Netflix was great, then the market fractured and Netflix enshitified in response.

What it would take here is for a publisher to become a real distributor in the space, but competition is weak right now. Just like it really took Disney wading in to disrupt Netflix, it would take someone equally large, like Microsoft, to disrupt Steam. Sorry Ubisoft, but you don't cut it.

[-] rivalary@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 months ago

Publishers already tried this (EA, Ubisoft, etc) and it didn't really work. They came back to Steam.

load more comments (3 replies)

[-] Gingernate@programming.dev 16 points 3 months ago

Arrg matey!

[-] Khrux@ttrpg.network 7 points 3 months ago

I don't play many AAA games but I'm forever gutted that the fight to make them able to be pirated is a losing battle. I want to pay for my indie games but on occasion I look online at the crack status of AAA games from oecen 2-3 years ago and they're still not playable.

It creates a weird dichotomy where people who pirate or at least don't buy expensive games don't take part in the mainstream gaming conversation at all, which is totally different from the rest of pirated media.

[-] topherclay@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

Which AAA aren't cracked?

The only two I can think of (that I've ever thought of playing but haven't been able to pirate) are the newer Dragons Dogma and the recent Black Myth Wukong game but those arent from 2-3 years ago so I'm curious which ones you are thinking about.

load more comments (4 replies)

[-] communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 9 points 3 months ago

They will never go public so enshittification rules don't necessarily apply

[-] jeff@programming.dev 15 points 3 months ago

Never say never, but I don't think it's going to happen while Gabe is in charge

[-] communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 8 points 3 months ago

I doubt gabe would choose a successor that would make steam public either, though.

[-] jeff@programming.dev 6 points 3 months ago

Maybe, maybe not. As equity holders get older they may be looking to cash out so they can fuel their retirements.

I don't think that's something Gabe is interested in, but we're talking about what will happen when he dies.

[-] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 months ago

Sure, but hopefully that's a very long time away, and there's always piracy. Hopefully Gabe lasts for another 20 years or longer. Hopefully he has a high-quality person as a successor.

load more comments (4 replies)

[-] secret300@lemmy.sdf.org 52 points 3 months ago

steam survey says 1.92% is on linux. So there's about 736,651 linux users on steam?! neat

[-] NewNewAccount@lemmy.world 26 points 3 months ago

Many of those Steam Deck, I bet.

[-] Unreliable@lemmy.ml 10 points 3 months ago

Bazzite on my desktop and a Steamdeck here!

[-] EveningNewbs@lemmy.world 23 points 3 months ago

https://partner.steamgames.com/ says there are 132 million monthly active Steam users, so that's more like 2.5 million Linux users on Steam.

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] half_built_pyramids@lemmy.world 26 points 3 months ago

Wild that the video game industry is so big, and this still isn't even 1% of people on earth.

[-] dabaldeagul@feddit.nl 35 points 3 months ago

Also keep in mind this is peak concurrent players. I imagine the MAU is much higher, since most of the world doesn't game at the same time.

[-] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 31 points 3 months ago

This is just steam. It's estimated that about 3 billion people regularly play video games.

[-] Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 months ago

Yeah but you'd think more what use steam. I wonder what the platform breakdown is .

[-] Ptsf@lemmy.world 38 points 3 months ago

90% mobile phones my guy.

[-] jawa21@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 3 months ago

Sure, but 38,000,000 x $60 = $2,280,000,000. And that's if they all spend only $60/year, and only on Steam, and the average I'm sure is much higher.

load more comments (3 replies)

[+] HipsterTenZero@dormi.zone 20 points 3 months ago

[deleted]

[-] Overspark@feddit.nl 31 points 3 months ago

COVID-19. 😏

[-] HipsterTenZero@dormi.zone 25 points 3 months ago

Damn, you reply quick. yep, I realized the instant i asked and felt stupid, eheh.

[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

Don't delete your comment for asking a legit question! Others might be ignorant as well and benefit from the Q&A.

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 15 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I remember when 9 million was a lot.

I remember when 1 million was a lot.

[-] Mediocre_Bard@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

To think that we have lived so long.

[-] JPSound@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago

It's still crazy to me that this is the same program I used to browse CS zombie mod servers. There was no real store to speak of then.

[-] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago

All of them playing that KFC dating Sim

[-] mr_MADAFAKA@lemmy.ml 7 points 3 months ago

Cant believe this actually exist xd https://store.steampowered.com/app/1121910/I_Love_You_Colonel_Sanders_A_Finger_Lickin_Good_Dating_Simulator/

[-] vvvvv@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

Still wild to me how competition shoots themselves in the foot. It's even worse than streaming services.

[-] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 months ago

I honestly thought the number of concurrent users was a lot higher a lot longer ago, but either way, it's come a long way since ~2003?

[-] atro_city@fedia.io 3 points 3 months ago

38 million only? I thought there were way more gamers out there. Isn't it a market bigger than TV and cinema combined? (maybe even sports included?)

[-] Davel23@fedia.io 10 points 3 months ago

These are concurrent users, i.e. the number of players all playing at one time. The total number of Steam users is WAY higher.