207
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone 49 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I’m as much a fan of schadenfreude as the next guy, but every test brings this weapon closer to the battle field.

[-] wowleak@sh.itjust.works 28 points 3 months ago

Still i bet russia would prefer that they had Sarmat working so they could use it as a threat.

[-] vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 3 months ago

Of course! I’d also like all my programs to run fine without bugs the first time. But that’s just not the nature of things. What we’re seeing here is, ummm, hardware debugging. It’s the process of getting to a reliable delivery system unfolding in real time.

That said, this quest for a Super Weapon that will force the West to finally recognize Russia as a Real Power Once and For All is super fucking creepy. It’s equal parts Bond villain and the final years of another famous European dictator. Neither are exciting prospects for world security.

[-] wowleak@sh.itjust.works 18 points 3 months ago

It did run fine the first time :) then the next 4 launches failed. My hope is that sanctions and bright pepole leaving russia has made in hard to launch nukes. We will see.

[-] phuntis@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)
[-] FilthyShrooms@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

Sadly that's not how it works, especially with government money. A good example is SpaceX, they succeeded so fast because they failed fast and learned fast. Failure is always progress as long as you don't give up

That being said the Russians should totally give up

[-] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 39 points 3 months ago

James Acton, a senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, wrote on X that the before-and-after imagery of the Sarmat missile silo was "very persuasive that there was a big explosion."

Glad they got an expert to weigh in on this...

[-] Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 21 points 3 months ago

I mean, how am i supposed to know if there's an explosion happened just because it happen to have a giant-ass crater?

[-] Tiptopit@feddit.org 12 points 3 months ago

It's weird how explosions often take place where craters are

[-] bradorsomething@ttrpg.network 10 points 3 months ago

Every asteroid that hit earth landed where a crater is. It’s like they’re attracted to craters somehow.

[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

TBF it could have just been an underground facility collapsing due to the stress from a rocket launch.

[-] Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 6 points 3 months ago

That's what stress could do to you.

[-] Monument@lemmy.sdf.org 23 points 3 months ago

It’s very funny to me how much nonsense is in this article.

What I mean by that is that the satellite photos - they look like Cuban missile crisis photos. I understand why they would mask the capability of spy tech, but I can get clearer imagery of my house from google.
And they don’t know when the launch failure occurred? There are plenty of seismographs that would pick up a large explosion like that. Psh.

[-] Comment105@lemm.ee 26 points 3 months ago

You sure you're not comparing it to Google's airplane footage, instead of their satellite footage?

[-] Monument@lemmy.sdf.org 18 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

….

In two hours I have a reoccurring leadership-type meeting where finding replacement vendors for Nearmap has been a topic of discussion for a few years. (TBF, my focus is on data accessibility and interoperability. I kind of zone out for that part of the meeting.)

I honestly don’t know why I have never considered that Google flies its imagery.

[-] Comment105@lemm.ee 17 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I think specifically the parts that get modern Google Earth style 3D mapping are always shot from airplanes, I looked it up a long time ago when I was wondering why I couldn't see our new address in 3D.

I have no sources at hand to share, but I'm sure more detailed information is easily ducked or binged or whatever you fancy.

But you can look at Dublin, for example. Compare the light green and dark green parts: https://maps.app.goo.gl/NJn5DhpW85ym9yCa7

I then compared it to San Francisco and New York, which are even higher resolution.
In rural areas the resolution seems to get lower again.

[-] Monument@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 3 months ago

Yeah - absolutely.
I didn’t explicitly agree with you in my response, but what you’re saying makes perfect sense. I’m just… dumbfounded it did not occur to me. Having my hands in that space is literally something I do.

If I can spare my ego just slightly - I’m sure the military has way better imaging than what was shown (but my comparison to Google maps was a bad one).

[-] BraveLittleToaster@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

I understand why they would mask the capability of spy tech

Then why are you confused?

[-] Monument@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 3 months ago

My comment said I was amused.

What point are you trying to make, or what angle are you trying to get at?

[-] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 3 points 3 months ago

This is from a commercial satellite though.

[-] Poach@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Are you trying to say the Google maps imagery is not commercial satellite data?

[-] dev_null@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 months ago

That's correct. Google Maps imagery is not satellite data, it's airplane photos.

[-] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 3 points 3 months ago

The comment I replied to was talking about spy tech, I was pointing out that the photos were from a commercial satellite, whose specs are likely well known.

[-] Monument@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 3 months ago

Hey, and you’re right about that. It’s what I get for commenting on stuff with 4am insomnia. The photos are clearly credited to Maxar Technologies, which for some reason I know to be a satellite imaging company. (Yet I can’t remember my own zip code without thinking about it.)

[-] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 1 points 3 months ago

I think maxar might even be the company Google licenses the Google Earth imagery from

[-] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 19 points 3 months ago

Goddamn liquid fueled ICBM, and they think this is new tech?

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 37 points 3 months ago

Say what you like about the Sovs, they glorified engineers and scientists. Modern Russia both treats and portrays them as trash (as opposed to just treating them as trash) without the slightest bit of respect for their trade, and then are confused when all the smart lads and lasses go to the degenerate globalhomo West.

At least in the Soviet Union the risk of GULAG was balanced out slightly by the prospect of getting legit accolades from the government for being good with the designing and the thinky-numbers. In modern Russia, all you get is poisoned tea, shit pay, and no respect.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago

Say what you like about the Sovs, they glorified engineers and scientists.

I'm gonna have to disagree with you there. When engineers and scientists couldn't do what Stalin asked he convicted them of sabotage and espionage and threw them into gulags. And it happened a lot. Also, much like the US, most of the Soviet engineering knowledge was gained from the Nazis during their version of Operation Paperclip.

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

Oh, my point wasn't that they were treated WELL, especially not considering the arbitrary nature of the Soviet state apparatus. My point is that the Soviets, as a society, considered those to be prestigious and worthy careers, and pronounced that very loudly. Like how the US culturally puts a high value on military veterans in reaction to the horrific behavior towards troops returning from Vietnam, making respect for modern veterans essential in decent society, but practically speaking, the government still treats them like shit. By contrast, the modern Russian Federation doesn't give a single good goddamn about engineers and scientists, and often actively scorns them.

The nice words and shit treatment are hypocritical, but as anyone who's ever been scorned for their choice of career will tell you, it's still better than shite words and shit treatment.

[-] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

It was just propaganda though. USSR didn'r treat their scientists and engineers a lick better than Russia does. It was just lip service.

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 24 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)
  1. "We are who we pretend to be, so we must be careful who we pretend to be." The stated values of a society are very often violated, but that they are stated usually influences behavior in that society.

  2. The Sovs definitely put a lot of effort into telling engineers and scientists that they were HEROES OF SOCIALIST LABOR and emphasizing the same to the general population. Engineers and scientists were socially valued professions. A scrap of paper in congratulations or a bit of metal and a ribbon may not be much, but as Napoleon once noted, men will do a lot for that little bit of recognition. By contrast, modern Russia has adopted a very 'thuggish' attitude towards academics, especially from state media, and it is oligarchs and ultranationalists who are glorified instead.

  3. In Soviet society, really only military officers and higher government functionaries had it better than scientists and engineers. "You get the nice apartment, access to the good stores, and a little dacha in the countryside" may not be much by Western standards, but treatment is relative to the society in which one lives - scientists and engineers were getting the good upper-middle class life. Modern Russia says "You can make as much with a doctorate as some idiot in a real country with an associate's" and siphons the rest off for megayachts. Not very inspiring.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 months ago

Well, they're burning UDMH, which is some scary fucking shit. I can't imagine being in an underground ~~tomb~~bunker with several dozens of tons of it.

[-] user134450@feddit.org 4 points 3 months ago

UDMH

At least that stuff is stable while in a tank. Imagine sitting next to tons of rocket grade hydrogen peroxide, slowly decomposing, just waiting for an excuse to go boom.

load more comments (21 replies)
[-] petrescatraian@libranet.de 2 points 3 months ago

@threelonmusketeers When you test that superweapon of you:

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2024
207 points (99.5% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

6791 readers
843 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.

11. No misinformation

NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS