378

Former U.S. presidents are authorized a security detail from the Secret Service for life. If Trump loses the election and flees the country, does his security detail have to go with him if he requests it?

I imagine this could go down in a variety of ways: He departs the U.S. before he's sentenced and just never returns, or he attempts to flees or does flees the U.S. after his sentencing. Either way, what happens to his security detail?

If he attempts to flees after he's sentenced, I would hope the detail would refuse to take part in it (if he can even board a plane/leave the country to begin with), but given all their failings, who knows.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Furbag@lemmy.world 44 points 6 days ago

USSS won't just let him get on a plane and fly off to Russia. His security is their top priority, so allowing him to secrete himself somewhere without first verifying his itinerary and securing both the mode of transportation and the destination, would be unthinkable. That means they are reporting all of his movements to local law enforcement. Can't exactly flee the country in secret when every cop in the state will know his exact position and have eyes on him at all times. If the courts think he is a flight risk, someone involved in the process will know what he's trying to do and prevent him from going anywhere where it will be hard to get him back again.

[-] rsuri@lemmy.world 33 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

The former presidents act seems to imply that a former president can decline Secret Service protection and even get $1 million for doing so. So I imagine he could just decline protection and hire his own security. But that would make it pretty obvious that he's planning on fleeing.

[-] Revan343@lemmy.ca 6 points 6 days ago

But that would make it pretty obvious that he's planning on fleeing.

As if that would be the first hint

[-] TheGalacticVoid@lemm.ee 5 points 6 days ago

I didn't know that Secret Service was mandatory for former US Presidents.

[-] Furbag@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago

I suppose he could dismiss them, but considering he just had two recent attempts on his life, that would probably be unwise to say the least.

[-] TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

But those lawsuits aren't at the federal level, they are at the state level, or so I understand. The secret service operates at the federal level. And if they are at the federal level, well, the Supreme Court has been stuffed and they've been pretty flagrant at expanding GQP corruption mechanics.

[-] robolemmy@lemmy.world 173 points 1 week ago

AFAIK ex-presidents aren’t allowed to leave the country without specific permission, due to all the classified crap in their heads. If one tried to flee the country, it would be their detail’s duty to detain them.

Heck, they’re not even allowed to drive in public roads… not that Trump has probably ever driven a car.

[-] robocall@lemmy.world 108 points 1 week ago

not that Trump has probably ever driven a car

[-] robolemmy@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago

Thanks for the confirmation, robobruddah

[-] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 1 week ago

That’s also not the look of a man with much of anything in his head.

Just concepts of a plan.

[-] SkybreakerEngineer@lemmy.world 59 points 1 week ago

You could say the same about running off with boxes of classified docs and keeping them in a bathroom. Reality is they don't care as long as he's alive

[-] 2pt_perversion@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago

No, most of this is untrue. Ex Presidents can refuse secret service detail. They are allowed to drive on public roads - that is a secret service rule that they can't but it's not against the law and Presidents don't have to follow those rules. And they are allowed to live outside the US if a host country allows them.

[-] bane_killgrind@slrpnk.net 1 points 6 days ago

You think that guy has a driver's licence

He has had a driver forever.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] radix@lemmy.world 116 points 1 week ago

Security is a privilege, not a mandate. Nixon dropped his in 1985.

Becoming a fugitive from justice would count as voluntarily giving up lots of privileges, the very least of which would be a publicly funded security detail.

[-] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I imagine they would just arrest him and hand him over for protection. Any member who allowed it would be breaking their oath and supporting an enemy of the state at that point would they not?

Edit: I meant prosecution, not protection, but apparently people understood

[-] radix@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

If we're gaming the whole scenario out, I imagine it would go something like this.

None of his current convictions are expected to come with a custodial sentence, but say he loses the election, and the more serious trials are heating up. At that point, he knows he's toast. 2028 is too late to run a fourth time; he's got no more hail marys, so he dismisses his detail completely, retreats to Florida, and sneaks away to Saudi Arabia in the middle of the night.

He's got a private jet, so getting out of the country shouldn't be a huge problem. But I think you're right that he has to set all this in motion before a guilty verdict is delivered. At that point, getting away from the secret service would be much more difficult.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] eran_morad@lemmy.world 88 points 1 week ago

USSS is on this guy like flies on shit and you’d better believe he’s not going anywhere if he loses the election. TF do you think Harris is gonna do, just be like “yeah, that trump guy, fuck him, whatever.” Everyone knows that he’s a tremendous national security risk (which truly blows my mind - assholes are going to actively vote to sabotage their own country).

[-] GraniteM@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I'm just imagining being the poor sap working for a foreign power trying to extract useful information from his cottage cheese brain.

"Do you have nuclear subs in the South China Sea?"

"We have to be extremely vigilant and extremely careful when it comes to nuclear. Nuclear changes the whole ballgame. ... The biggest problem we have is nuclear — nuclear proliferation and having some maniac, having some madman go out and get a nuclear weapon. That’s in my opinion, that is the single biggest problem that our country faces right now."

"Where! Are! The nuclear! Subs! Deployed!"

"Look, having nuclear — my uncle was a great professor and scientist and engineer, Dr. John Trump at MIT; good genes, very good genes, OK, very smart, the Wharton School of Finance, very good, very smart — you know, if you're a conservative Republican, if I were a liberal, if, like, OK, if I ran as a liberal Democrat, they would say I'm one of the smartest people anywhere in the world — it's true! — but when you're a conservative Republican they try — oh, do they do a number — that's why I always start off: Went to Wharton, was a good student, went there, went there, did this, built a fortune — you know I have to give my like credentials all the time, because we're a little disadvantaged — but you look at the nuclear deal, the thing that really bothers me — it would have been so easy, and it's not as important as these lives are — nuclear is so powerful; my uncle explained that to me many, many years ago, the power and that was 35 years ago; he would explain the power of what's going to happen and he was right, who would have thought? — but when you look at what's going on with the four prisoners — now it used to be three, now it's four — but when it was three and even now, I would have said it's all in the messenger; fellas, and it is fellas because, you know, they don't, they haven't figured that the women are smarter right now than the men, so, you know, it's gonna take them about another 150 years — but the Persians are great negotiators, the Iranians are great negotiators, so, and they, they just killed, they just killed us, this is horrible."

[-] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 days ago

"I have the concept of a nuclear sub, it's gonna be the best nuclear sub. People at gonna see it and be like: That's such a nuclear great sub. Such sub."

[-] GraniteM@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

"Big, beautiful submarine captains come up to me. Covered with muscles, muscles like nobody has ever seen before. Tears running down their cheeks. They say 'Sir, thank you for sending us to the South China Sea! Nobody ever sent us there before!' But I don't get angry! I should get angry and sometimes I do get angry, but with these captains I don't get angry. They say 'Thank you, sir! Thank you!' But nobody ever thought of South China before! I came up with that, but nobody gives me credit for South China!"

[-] harmsy@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

“Where! Are! The nuclear! Subs! Deployed!”

In Alameda, I guess?

[-] Asafum@feddit.nl 32 points 1 week ago

which truly blows my mind - assholes are going to actively vote to sabotage their own country

The problem is they don't see it at all. Anyone who is truly in favor of Trump is watching propaganda that will always frame him as a poor victim of evil Democrat smear campaigns. Anyone else who is voting for him because they're a Republican and they just always vote R is just not paying attention and also fall under the category of "not seeing it." :(

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 50 points 1 week ago

They aren't lawsuits, they're criminal indictments. Big difference.

[-] Death_Equity@lemmy.world 46 points 1 week ago

The USSS would not have any obligation to a former president that is a fugitive from law.

As individuals they could abandon their service, which has serious legal remifications, and follow Trump of their own choice. I doubt any would do that because why they became USSS and how badly it would ruin their lives.

[-] grasshopper_mouse@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

So I looked into the USSS, and here from their FAQ: "Under Title 18, Section 3056, of the United States Code, agents and officers of the United States Secret Service can:

Carry firearms

Execute warrants issued under the laws of the United States

Make arrests without warrants for any offense against the United States committed in their presence, or for any felony recognizable under the laws of the United States if they have reasonable grounds to believe that the person to be arrested has committed such felony

Offer and pay rewards for services and information leading to the apprehension of persons involved in the violation of the law that the Secret Service is authorized to enforce

Investigate fraud in connection with identification documents, fraudulent commerce, fictitious instruments and foreign securities and

Perform other functions and duties authorized by law"

This leads me to wonder just how many times a SS Agent witnessed Trump committing a felony in their presence but didn't arrest him.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] HotsauceHurricane@lemmy.one 41 points 1 week ago

I imagine the second he requests asylum or says he is a resident of another country, the USSS recalls every agent attached to him. They still work for a us government agency & are not answerable to a former, disgraced, president.

[-] Wilzax@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

Or rather, they assassinate him themselves, since someone who has held clearance higher than any other member of the US government is a liability if he becomes disloyal to the US

[-] JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

Nah the USSS won't kill him.

That's the CIA's job

[-] Wilzax@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

While accurate, we'll probably never find out if they end up being the ones responsible for his assassination.

[-] Revan343@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 days ago

It would become public around 20-30 years later, if the contra program is any indication

[-] SacralPlexus@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

Plane went down over the Atlantic during mysterious circumstances.

[-] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)
[-] Wilzax@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

Yeah I know he is already, but if he becomes more overt about it then the government will be more likely to be overt about treating him as such

[-] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

Yeah. It's a spiral that our media culture seems perfectly engineered for.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 36 points 1 week ago

You forgot about the old "What's that over there?" trick.

🏃‍♂️👉⁉️

[-] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 24 points 1 week ago

Good question, as is everything around trump as every situation with that loser is one that has never happened before

[-] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago

The whole point of the USSS protecting former Presidents is to prevent this exact thing from happening. The USSS would do everything in their power to prevent him from fleeing or to get him back.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] riodoro1@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago

You are assuming he is going to be sentenced in the US which as we’ve all seen is impossible.

[-] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

So you're saying Trump knows this and doesn't plan to leave the country?

[-] bufalo1973@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 days ago

"if Santiago was safe, why the order?"

[-] AshMan85@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

Secret service takes their orders from the current president. So, if the order were given to bring him in they would have too.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

Yes, but extradition back when the court issues a bench warrant would also be extremely easy. If there's already an order keeping him from traveling they'd have to enforce it. Which is part of why that New York judge getting scared was bad, the system is poorly designed for rich defendants. Usually it handles it by getting their passport and restricting them from traveling.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2024
378 points (97.0% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35449 readers
781 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS