310
submitted 3 days ago by girlfreddy@lemmy.ca to c/news@lemmy.world

Fewer young people are having sex, but the teens and young adults who are sexually active aren’t using condoms as regularly, if at all. And people ages 15 to 24 made up half of new chlamydia, gonorrhea and syphilis cases in 2022.

The downward trend in condom usage is due to a few things: medical advancements like long-term birth control options and drugs that prevent sexually transmitted infections; a fading fear of contracting HIV; and widely varying degrees of sex education in high schools.

Is this the end of condoms? Not exactly. But it does have some public health experts thinking about how to help younger generations have safe sex, be aware of their options — condoms included — and get tested for STIs regularly.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] capt_wolf@lemmy.world 239 points 3 days ago

Who'd have thought banning sex ed in schools would result in unsafe sex amongst teens!?

[-] MeatPilot@lemmy.world 37 points 3 days ago

Back when they used to teach Sex Ed. All of us (boys and girls) had to try to put a condom on a banana. The kicker was we were wearing goggles with vaseline smeared on the lens and had thick rubber gloves on.

This was to simulate trying to put on a condom well under the influence.

[-] Valmond@lemmy.world 17 points 3 days ago

Just do it with the mouth 👄 😺

Crazy stuff though to force you to do that, good but crazy.

[-] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Well that's not effective training at all. They should have gotten you drunk and simulated a wedding reception.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 41 points 3 days ago

No one could have predicted it. It was completely out of left field. Unheard of. I’m saying that this is unprecedented. We couldn’t have known! Lé sigh.

[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 32 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

If only there were a publicly funded US institution that helps children plan and prepare for sex and parenthood.

Hmmmmmm....

[-] masinko@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

Public funding? In my freedom!? Get that communist nonsense out of here!!!

[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

They were actually more opposed to teaching anything other than abstinence when religious conservatives constantly attacked and shut down Planned Parenthood centers. Many voters were misled to think the centers offered abortion directly as well.

[-] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 20 points 2 days ago

My kids would have to socialize with people in person to need a condom.

They never leave the house except to go to school and as soon as they're done, they rush home to "hang out with their friends" online...

[-] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 18 points 2 days ago

Digital condoms are 100% effective

[-] GhiLA@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 days ago

One 40k lore book and a Minecraft account and you're golden. No grandbabies.

[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

I was ahead of the curve and doing that over 30 years ago! No online, though...

[-] WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com 105 points 3 days ago

Unpopular opinion: the complete lack of anyone addressing reduced sensation that comes with condom use when talking to teens is also a contributing factor. I have literally never been able to have an orgasm with a condom on. The first time I had sex, the girl kept asking me if I was gay because I kept losing my erection to the weird glove like sensation on my dick.

I ended up tackling this problem by being careful and being in a string of committed relationships, but I thought there was something wrong with me until stories on the internet made it clear that I wasn’t the only one.

So if I was a modern teen, and knew things could mostly be solved with antibiotics, and had death grip from an adolescence on pornography, AND discovered I couldn’t keep it up when wrapped…then I probably wouldn’t use them either.

[-] Valmond@lemmy.world 66 points 3 days ago

Maybe another myth can be cleared out too, the one of "one size fits all". Curiously it is totally okay to have smaller condoms, but mot bigger...

Too small condoms give exactly the effect you're describing, IMO.

[-] JackFrostNCola@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

This was my exact problem and after like a decade i read something and had the 'oh shit, they mean width not length in size', being an 'modest average' length i never considered buying the larger sizes.
I hope someone reads this comments and also actually checks to see if the same oversight is self-sabotaging their enjoyment.

[-] Rebels_Droppin@lemmy.world 24 points 3 days ago

Absolutely, all store brand condoms are too small for me. My girlfriend ordered me "myone" brand custom condoms and sex was suddenly enjoyable again. Take some measurements fellas and get condoms that fit.

[-] Valmond@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

The 64 and 69 (mm) from Condomerie in Amsterdam gets my recommendation (if durex xxl and that similar american magnum xxl? are too small) they ship worldwide.

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 24 points 3 days ago

Were you trying the good kind or the cheap ones they give out for free at health centers? I started with the free ones and they were terrible. I tried the Trojan sample packs and found that I didn't even notice the condom any more. One time I actually had to stop and make sure it didn't break because it literally felt like it wasn't even there!

I still have trouble maintaining when I stop to even put the condom on, but that's a separate issue.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 27 points 3 days ago

I got those crappy condoms they gave out for free. It also dulled the sensation to the point of losing my erection.

Years later I found out that store bought condoms actually can feel good. If I had known that, maybe I would have used them.

[-] ABCDE@lemmy.world 31 points 3 days ago

For me it was the opposite, I needed the dulling to go a reasonable amount of time, but that wasn't addressed either. There are ultra thin condoms, and lubing up before bagging up can help.

[-] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 3 days ago

I had the same problem when I was younger. I then ordered a pack of most brands out there to find what worked for me. I landed on Crown. Even then, it's still not as good. I have since had a vasectomy and only use condoms to keep my toys safe.

But yeah, none of this is taught to teens. Education in america is a fucking joke.

[-] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 5 points 2 days ago

"Hey man, why are all these action figures stuffed into condoms?"

[-] jerkface@lemmy.ca 10 points 3 days ago

I just stopped making PI* the main course of my sexual banquette. There's much better ways to spend time with a sexy person.

[-] bamfic@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

Pi star? Is that sex with an embedded microprocessor?

[-] jerkface@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

PIV/PIA meaning "penis in vagina/anus"

[-] prole@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago

I thought you were trying to make a math joke (Pi * r² or something).

[-] Emerald@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Should've used the classic x instead

[-] eldavi@lemmy.ml 8 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

it's lack of sensation for me since i'm uncircumcised and the 2 layers when i wear a condom guarantees no sensation.

i suspect that you don't hear much about this subject because it's the Achilles heals of condoms where nothing will help it and people don't engage unless they think they have something that can help.

[-] its_prolly_fine@sh.itjust.works 13 points 3 days ago
[-] usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 days ago

They are having sex with a chicken so the chicken counts as one

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 days ago

Sure but do realize you are an outlier. In general teens are More likely to orgasm prematurely and a thin modern condom is a relatively minor sensory barrier and can improve the duration of sexual encounters

[-] jerkface@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 days ago

Do you have data? You talk like you have data.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Drusas@fedia.io 38 points 3 days ago

Same is true of the elderly. There's been a huge spike in STIs in retirement homes.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] beepnoise@piefed.social 51 points 3 days ago

I swear between vaccines and this, it's like we've collectively gone backwards.

I do note this is an article based in US but I do wonder if it applies across the world - in the UK, chlamydia and gonorrhoea has gone up (link) with the bullet point at the end:

the impact of STIs remains greatest in young people aged 15 to 24 years; GBMSM; and some minority ethnic groups

For goodness sakes, lads! Put a rubber on it!!

This is really unprovable, but my theory is that this is also another result of late-stage capitalistic exhaustion. While young people still want to be ethical and moral and safe, there's a lot of moment-to-moment existential rebellion with so many layers of rules, norms and expectations.

It's similar to the rise of "treat" habits - if there's no realistic possibility of the American dream and house and white picket fence and kids for an average worker's salary, you have a moment of probably irresponsible spending that feels life affirming, to shake off the feeling of being in a Matrix pod that's sucking out your life force in the most efficient manner possible.

Hence, no condom! Or something.

[-] AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee 6 points 3 days ago

This is what you get when you constantly gut education

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] celsiustimeline@lemmy.dbzer0.com 35 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Why did we stop listing HIV as a risk of unprotected sex? Everyone mentions chlamydia, which is notoriously common but also very easy to treat and cure, as one of the risks of unprotected sex. I dunno, what about the totally incurable virus that kills you or at least drastically shortens your life span?

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 18 points 3 days ago

For one thing, modern hiv treatments are sufficient to let people live basically normal lives (and more or less stops one from transmitting to sexual partners.)

It’s basically now “just” a chronic condition that requires managing, not a death sentence.

[-] scoobford@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 days ago

Also, you can take PrEP to avoid catching it in the first place.

Which for the record, you absolutely should do if you're queer, your partner is queer, or if you engage in high risk behaviors. Asymptomatic HIV is a scary thing.

[-] Meron35@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago

Because PrEP exists, which when taken as prescribed reduces the chance of HIV transmission by ~99%.

HIV transmission virtually eliminated in Inner Sydney, Australia | International AIDS Society (IAS) - https://www.iasociety.org/news-release/hiv-transmission-virtually-eliminated-inner-sydney-australia

Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) | HIV Risk and Prevention | HIV/AIDS | CDC - https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/risk/prep/index.html

[-] Drusas@fedia.io 12 points 3 days ago

Antibiotic-resistant strains of chlamydia have been spreading, actually.

[-] Wahots@pawb.social 14 points 3 days ago

Hep C too. Not incurable, but you really don't want to get any BBPs.

[-] hopesdead@startrek.website 10 points 3 days ago

I would immediately cite anti-LGBTQIA+ sentimentality as the contributing factor. While lots of people understand that homosexuals aren’t the only people who can contract the infection, I’m sure the treatments being aimed primarily at homosexuals as the highest risk group, will make certain people unwilling to believe it is a potential risk.

It sucks that safe sex isn’t a thing being discussed. However it does feel like anti-abortion laws would be unnecessary if teens had access to sought information. I’m sure with the advent of Internet based pornography, teens are being influenced more by that with no educational tools to say that people in pornography (I am sure not everyone across the industry follows health guidelines but for the “professionals” you’d hope they do) have access to testing and other health related care.

If we are going to be cynical about this, one reason I suspect sex education is no longer being thought would be to fall inline with twisted alt-right/conservative values about women NEEDING to have children. With lack of information about contraception, teens might believe they can’t be safe. Maybe they actually have access to contraception but aren’t aware. Maybe contraception is being banned. If you have no contraception, then the rate of pregnancy will increase and maybe those anti-abortion lawmakers wish to see more unwanted pregnancies instead of anyone wishing to engage in recreational sex that doesn’t aim for procreation.

[-] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 9 points 3 days ago

Because HIV isn't an automatic death sentence anymore, as long as one has access to the drugs available.

[-] Emerald@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

In the USA, it might be an automatic death sentence to your wallet. Don't hava insurance? Die on the street. Brought to you by the American Dream

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] vovo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2024
310 points (98.7% liked)

News

23051 readers
3053 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS